public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 1/4] x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with an arbitrary hint
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:59:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250110115953.6058-2-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250110115953.6058-1-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>

Introduce a helper function to allow offlined CPUs to enter FFh idle
states with a specific MWAIT hint. The new helper will be used in
subsequent patches by the acpi_idle and intel_idle drivers.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h |  3 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c  | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
index ca073f40698f..dfd09a1e09bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ void wbinvd_on_cpu(int cpu);
 int wbinvd_on_all_cpus(void);
 
 void smp_kick_mwait_play_dead(void);
+void mwait_play_dead(unsigned int hint);
 
 void native_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu);
 void native_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask);
@@ -164,6 +165,8 @@ static inline struct cpumask *cpu_llc_shared_mask(int cpu)
 {
 	return (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(0);
 }
+
+static inline void mwait_play_dead(unsigned int eax_hint) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NMI_SELFTEST
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index b5a8f0891135..8a3545c2cae9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1272,13 +1272,57 @@ void play_dead_common(void)
 	local_irq_disable();
 }
 
+void __noreturn mwait_play_dead(unsigned int eax_hint)
+{
+	struct mwait_cpu_dead *md = this_cpu_ptr(&mwait_cpu_dead);
+
+	/* Set up state for the kexec() hack below */
+	md->status = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
+	md->control = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
+
+	wbinvd();
+
+	while (1) {
+		/*
+		 * The CLFLUSH is a workaround for erratum AAI65 for
+		 * the Xeon 7400 series.  It's not clear it is actually
+		 * needed, but it should be harmless in either case.
+		 * The WBINVD is insufficient due to the spurious-wakeup
+		 * case where we return around the loop.
+		 */
+		mb();
+		clflush(md);
+		mb();
+		__monitor(md, 0, 0);
+		mb();
+		__mwait(eax_hint, 0);
+
+		if (READ_ONCE(md->control) == CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT) {
+			/*
+			 * Kexec is about to happen. Don't go back into mwait() as
+			 * the kexec kernel might overwrite text and data including
+			 * page tables and stack. So mwait() would resume when the
+			 * monitor cache line is written to and then the CPU goes
+			 * south due to overwritten text, page tables and stack.
+			 *
+			 * Note: This does _NOT_ protect against a stray MCE, NMI,
+			 * SMI. They will resume execution at the instruction
+			 * following the HLT instruction and run into the problem
+			 * which this is trying to prevent.
+			 */
+			WRITE_ONCE(md->status, CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT);
+			while(1)
+				native_halt();
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * We need to flush the caches before going to sleep, lest we have
  * dirty data in our caches when we come back up.
  */
-static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
+static inline void mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint(void)
 {
-	struct mwait_cpu_dead *md = this_cpu_ptr(&mwait_cpu_dead);
 	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 	unsigned int highest_cstate = 0;
 	unsigned int highest_subcstate = 0;
@@ -1316,45 +1360,7 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
 			(highest_subcstate - 1);
 	}
 
-	/* Set up state for the kexec() hack below */
-	md->status = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
-	md->control = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
-
-	wbinvd();
-
-	while (1) {
-		/*
-		 * The CLFLUSH is a workaround for erratum AAI65 for
-		 * the Xeon 7400 series.  It's not clear it is actually
-		 * needed, but it should be harmless in either case.
-		 * The WBINVD is insufficient due to the spurious-wakeup
-		 * case where we return around the loop.
-		 */
-		mb();
-		clflush(md);
-		mb();
-		__monitor(md, 0, 0);
-		mb();
-		__mwait(eax, 0);
-
-		if (READ_ONCE(md->control) == CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT) {
-			/*
-			 * Kexec is about to happen. Don't go back into mwait() as
-			 * the kexec kernel might overwrite text and data including
-			 * page tables and stack. So mwait() would resume when the
-			 * monitor cache line is written to and then the CPU goes
-			 * south due to overwritten text, page tables and stack.
-			 *
-			 * Note: This does _NOT_ protect against a stray MCE, NMI,
-			 * SMI. They will resume execution at the instruction
-			 * following the HLT instruction and run into the problem
-			 * which this is trying to prevent.
-			 */
-			WRITE_ONCE(md->status, CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT);
-			while(1)
-				native_halt();
-		}
-	}
+	mwait_play_dead(eax);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1407,7 +1413,7 @@ void native_play_dead(void)
 	play_dead_common();
 	tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
 
-	mwait_play_dead();
+	mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint();
 	if (cpuidle_play_dead())
 		hlt_play_dead();
 }
-- 
2.47.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-10 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-10 11:59 [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-10 11:59 ` Patryk Wlazlyn [this message]
2025-01-10 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] ACPI: processor_idle: Add FFH state handling Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-10 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] intel_idle: Provide the default enter_dead() handler Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-02-04  0:19   ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-10 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] x86/smp: Eliminate mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint() Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-10 15:17 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry Dave Hansen
2025-01-10 15:26   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2025-01-10 16:07     ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-10 16:50       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2025-01-16 16:02         ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-16 16:10           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-13 19:31   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250110115953.6058-2-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
    --to=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox