public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 6/9] osnoise: provide quiescent states
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:13:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250116201327.3782963-6-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df73d8ef-ef52-4f99-ac22-e2b66f0c644e@paulmck-laptop>

From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

To reduce RCU noise for nohz_full configurations, osnoise depends
on cond_resched() providing quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n
configurations. For PREEMPT_RCU=y configurations -- where
cond_resched() is a stub -- we do this by directly calling
rcu_momentary_eqs().

With (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n), however, we have a
configuration with (PREEMPTION=y, PREEMPT_RCU=n) where neither
of the above can help.

Handle that by providing an explicit quiescent state here for all
configurations.

As mentioned above this is not needed for non-stubbed cond_resched(),
but, providing a quiescent state here just pulls in one that a future
cond_resched() would provide, so doesn't cause any extra work for
this configuration.

Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
index b9f96c77527db..2340ffcefb9d1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
@@ -1531,27 +1531,25 @@ static int run_osnoise(void)
 
 		/*
 		 * In some cases, notably when running on a nohz_full CPU with
-		 * a stopped tick PREEMPT_RCU has no way to account for QSs.
-		 * This will eventually cause unwarranted noise as PREEMPT_RCU
-		 * will force preemption as the means of ending the current
-		 * grace period. We avoid this problem by calling
-		 * rcu_momentary_eqs(), which performs a zero duration
-		 * EQS allowing PREEMPT_RCU to end the current grace period.
-		 * This call shouldn't be wrapped inside an RCU critical
-		 * section.
+		 * a stopped tick PREEMPT_RCU or PREEMPT_LAZY have no way to
+		 * account for QSs. This will eventually cause unwarranted
+		 * noise as RCU forces preemption as the means of ending the
+		 * current grace period.  We avoid this by calling
+		 * rcu_momentary_eqs(), which performs a zero duration EQS
+		 * allowing RCU to end the current grace period. This call
+		 * shouldn't be wrapped inside an RCU critical section.
 		 *
-		 * Note that in non PREEMPT_RCU kernels QSs are handled through
-		 * cond_resched()
+		 * Normally QSs for other cases are handled through cond_resched().
+		 * For simplicity, however, we call rcu_momentary_eqs() for all
+		 * configurations here.
 		 */
-		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)) {
-			if (!disable_irq)
-				local_irq_disable();
+		if (!disable_irq)
+			local_irq_disable();
 
-			rcu_momentary_eqs();
+		rcu_momentary_eqs();
 
-			if (!disable_irq)
-				local_irq_enable();
-		}
+		if (!disable_irq)
+			local_irq_enable();
 
 		/*
 		 * For the non-preemptive kernel config: let threads runs, if
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-16 20:13 [PATCH rcu 0/9] Lazy-preemption-related updates Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 1/9] rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs() Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 2/9] rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 3/9] sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 4/9] rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict() Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 5/9] rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 7/9] rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 8/9] rcutorture: Make scenario TREE10 build CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY=y Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:13 ` [PATCH rcu 9/9] rcutorture: Make scenario TREE07 " Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55 ` [PATCH rcu 0/9] Lazy-preemption-related updates Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 1/9] rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs() Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 2/9] rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 3/9] sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 4/9] rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict() Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 5/9] rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 6/9] osnoise: provide quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 7/9] rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 8/9] rcutorture: Make scenario TREE10 build CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY=y Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:55   ` [PATCH rcu v2] 9/9] rcutorture: Make scenario TREE07 " Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250116201327.3782963-6-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=bristot@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox