From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:34:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250124183432.3565061-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
$ dmesg | grep PEBS
[ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
$ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
"dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
cannot be created successfully.
The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
from the existing hybrid platforms.
Fixes: d9977c43bff8 ("perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 10 ----------
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 7f1b6b90a5fb..0a1030eb6db8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4981,11 +4981,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
else
pmu->intel_ctrl &= ~(1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS);
- if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
- pmu->pmu.capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
- else
- pmu->pmu.capabilities &= ~PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
-
intel_pmu_check_event_constraints(pmu->event_constraints,
pmu->cntr_mask64,
pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64,
@@ -5063,9 +5058,6 @@ static bool init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
pr_info("%s PMU driver: ", pmu->name);
- if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
- pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT ");
-
pr_cont("\n");
x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(&pmu->pmu);
@@ -6420,11 +6412,9 @@ static __always_inline int intel_pmu_init_hybrid(enum hybrid_pmu_type pmus)
pmu->intel_cap.capabilities = x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities;
if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_small_tiny) {
pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 0;
- pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 1;
pmu->mid_ack = true;
} else if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_big) {
pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 1;
- pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 0;
pmu->late_ack = true;
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 13a78a8a2780..123b0e4392b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -2742,7 +2742,7 @@ void __init intel_ds_init(void)
}
pr_cont("PEBS fmt%d%c%s, ", format, pebs_type, pebs_qual);
- if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
+ if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT, ");
x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
}
--
2.38.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 18:34 kan.liang [this message]
2025-01-27 8:19 ` [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:34 ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-27 9:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
2025-01-27 11:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:41 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250124183432.3565061-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox