From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:34:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72dacfd6-4102-4efb-a699-875fa17acb28@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61c1018e-fcdc-461b-8de4-845b33f619c0@intel.com>
On 2025-01-27 3:19 a.m., Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 24/01/25 20:34, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
>> platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
>>
>> $ dmesg | grep PEBS
>> [ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
>>
>> $ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
>> cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
>> Error:
>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
>> for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
>> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>>
>> The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
>> capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
>> perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
>> supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
>> cannot be created successfully.
>>
>> The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
>> will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
>> from the existing hybrid platforms.
>>
>> Fixes: d9977c43bff8 ("perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs")
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 10 ----------
>> arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> index 7f1b6b90a5fb..0a1030eb6db8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> @@ -4981,11 +4981,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
>> else
>> pmu->intel_ctrl &= ~(1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS);
>>
>> - if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
>> - pmu->pmu.capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
>> - else
>> - pmu->pmu.capabilities &= ~PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
>> -
>> intel_pmu_check_event_constraints(pmu->event_constraints,
>> pmu->cntr_mask64,
>> pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64,
>> @@ -5063,9 +5058,6 @@ static bool init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
>>
>> pr_info("%s PMU driver: ", pmu->name);
>>
>> - if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
>> - pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT ");
>> -
>> pr_cont("\n");
>>
>> x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(&pmu->pmu);
>> @@ -6420,11 +6412,9 @@ static __always_inline int intel_pmu_init_hybrid(enum hybrid_pmu_type pmus)
>> pmu->intel_cap.capabilities = x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities;
>> if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_small_tiny) {
>> pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 0;
>> - pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 1;
>> pmu->mid_ack = true;
>> } else if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_big) {
>> pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 1;
>> - pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 0;
>> pmu->late_ack = true;
>> }
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> index 13a78a8a2780..123b0e4392b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> @@ -2742,7 +2742,7 @@ void __init intel_ds_init(void)
>> }
>> pr_cont("PEBS fmt%d%c%s, ", format, pebs_type, pebs_qual);
>>
>> - if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
>> + if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
>
> I'd suggest keeping the !is_hybrid() check here
> since it documents and enforces the effective policy.
Sigh, the !is_hybrid() should never work here either. Because the
intel_ds_init() is invoked before intel_pmu_init_hybrid(), which enable
perf_is_hybrid.
I think we'd better remove it, but I will add some comments to explain
the status of PEBS-via-PT on hybrid instead. For example,
/*
* The PEBS-via-PT is not supported on hybrid platforms, because not all
* CPUs of a hybrid machine support the feature. The global
* x86_pmu.intel_cap, which only contains the common capabilities, is
* used to check the availability of the feature. The per-PMU
* pebs_output_pt_available in a hybrid machine will be ignored.
*/
Thanks,
Kan
>
>> pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT, ");
>> x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
>> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-27 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 18:34 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid kan.liang
2025-01-27 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:34 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2025-01-27 9:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
2025-01-27 11:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:41 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72dacfd6-4102-4efb-a699-875fa17acb28@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox