From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<dsahern@kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@meta.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>,
<kuniyu@amazon.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<ushankar@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: document return value of dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu()
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:45:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250213104531.36861-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213-kickass-orchid-wildebeest-3ec3ae@leitao>
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 02:16:36 -0800
> Hello Kuniyuki,
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 04:47:48PM +0900, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
> > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:36:46 +0900
> > > From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:47:24 -0800
> > > > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > > > index d5ab9a4b318ea4926c200ef20dae01eaafa18c6b..0b3480a125fcaa6f036ddf219c29fa362ea0cb29 100644
> > > > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > > > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > > > @@ -1134,8 +1134,8 @@ int netdev_get_name(struct net *net, char *name, int ifindex)
> > > > * The returned device has not had its ref count increased
> > > > * and the caller must therefore be careful about locking
> > > > *
> > > > + * Return: pointer to the net_device, or NULL if not found
> > > > */
> > >
> I am a bit confused about what you are saying.
> > > I noticed here we still mention RTNL and it should be removed.
>
> I have no mention RTNL in this patch at all:
Yes, and patch 2 removes the part from kernel-doc of
dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu().
>
> # git log -n1 --oneline HEAD~2
> 6d34fd4700231 net: document return value of dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu()
> # git show HEAD~2 | grep -i rtnl
>
> > I missed this part is removed in patch 2, but the Return: part
> > is still duplicate.
>
> This part is also unclear to me. What do you mean the "Return:" part is
> still duplicated?
>
> This is how the documentation looks like, after the patch applied:
>
> /**
> * dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu - find a device by its hardware address
> * @net: the applicable net namespace
> * @type: media type of device
> * @ha: hardware address
> *
> * Search for an interface by MAC address. Returns NULL if the device
^^^^^^^
Sorry, I meant this part is redundant as we have Return: now.
> * is not found or a pointer to the device.
> * The caller must hold RCU.
> * The returned device has not had its ref count increased
> * and the caller must therefore be careful about locking
> *
> * Return: pointer to the net_device, or NULL if not found
> */
> struct net_device *dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu(struct net *net, unsigned short type,
> const char *ha)
> {
> <snip>
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 17:47 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: core: improvements to device lookup by hardware address Breno Leitao
2025-02-12 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: document return value of dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu() Breno Leitao
2025-02-13 7:36 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-02-13 7:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-02-13 10:16 ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-13 10:45 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-02-12 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: Add dev_getbyhwaddr_rtnl() helper Breno Leitao
2025-02-13 7:31 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-02-13 10:29 ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-13 10:52 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-02-13 12:29 ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-12 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] arp: switch to dev_getbyhwaddr() in arp_req_set_public() Breno Leitao
2025-02-13 7:45 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250213104531.36861-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox