From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
<devnull+mailhol.vincent.wanadoo.fr@kernel.org>
Cc: mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] bits: split the definition of the asm and non-asm GENMASK()
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:23:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250306192331.2701a029@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250306-fixed-type-genmasks-v5-1-b443e9dcba63@wanadoo.fr>
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 20:29:52 +0900
Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay <devnull+mailhol.vincent.wanadoo.fr@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
>
> In an upcoming change, GENMASK() and its friends will indirectly
> depend on sizeof() which is not available in asm.
>
> Instead of adding further complexity to __GENMASK() to make it work
> for both asm and non asm, just split the definition of the two
> variants.
...
> +#else /* defined(__ASSEMBLY__) */
> +
> +#define GENMASK(h, l) __GENMASK(h, l)
> +#define GENMASK_ULL(h, l) __GENMASK_ULL(h, l)
What do those actually expand to now?
As I've said a few times both UL(0) and ULL(0) are just (0) for __ASSEMBLY__
so the expansions of __GENMASK() and __GENMASK_ULL() contained the
same numeric constants.
This means they should be generating the same values.
I don't know the correct 'sizeof (int_type)' for the shift right of ~0.
My suspicion is that a 32bit assembler used 32bit signed integers and a
64bit one 64bit signed integers (but a 32bit asm on a 64bit host might
be 64bit).
So the asm versions need to avoid the right shift and only do left shifts.
Which probably means they need to be enirely separate from the C versions.
And then the C ones can have all the ULL() removed.
David
> +
> +#endif /* !defined(__ASSEMBLY__) */
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_BITS_H */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 11:29 [PATCH v5 0/7] bits: Fixed-type GENMASK()/BIT() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] bits: split the definition of the asm and non-asm GENMASK() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 13:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 15:07 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 17:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 14:34 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-06 17:10 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-13 4:16 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-13 6:06 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 19:23 ` David Laight [this message]
2025-03-07 9:58 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-07 13:27 ` David Laight
2025-03-07 15:50 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-09 1:58 ` David Laight
2025-03-09 10:23 ` David Laight
2025-03-10 10:46 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] bits: introduce fixed-type genmasks Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 13:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 16:08 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 17:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] bits: introduce fixed-type BIT_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/i915: Convert REG_GENMASK*() to fixed-width GENMASK_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] test_bits: add tests for __GENMASK() and __GENMASK_ULL() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-13 4:13 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-13 6:00 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-13 13:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] test_bits: add tests for GENMASK_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] test_bits: add tests for BIT_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 13:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 16:08 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 17:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-07 10:11 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-07 16:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-07 16:47 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-13 4:10 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-06 13:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] bits: Fixed-type GENMASK()/BIT() Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 14:56 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 13:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250306192331.2701a029@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devnull+mailhol.vincent.wanadoo.fr@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox