From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] test_bits: add tests for BIT_U*()
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:55:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8nhdz5FZIHYb4Yi@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <722e147b-fdd1-4098-8d60-48c83e36a7f7@wanadoo.fr>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:08:15AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
> >> From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
> >>
> >> Add some additional tests in lib/test_bits.c to cover the expected
> >> results of the fixed type BIT_U*() macros.
> >
> > Still would be good to have a small assembly test case for GENMASK*() as they
> > went split and it will be a good regression test in case somebody decides to
> > unify both without much thinking..
>
> Let me confirm that I correctly understood your ask. Would something
> like this meet your expectations?
I believe it should be written in asm.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 11:29 [PATCH v5 0/7] bits: Fixed-type GENMASK()/BIT() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] bits: split the definition of the asm and non-asm GENMASK() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 13:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 15:07 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 17:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 14:34 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-06 17:10 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-13 4:16 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-13 6:06 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 19:23 ` David Laight
2025-03-07 9:58 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-07 13:27 ` David Laight
2025-03-07 15:50 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-09 1:58 ` David Laight
2025-03-09 10:23 ` David Laight
2025-03-10 10:46 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] bits: introduce fixed-type genmasks Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 13:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 16:08 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 17:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] bits: introduce fixed-type BIT_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/i915: Convert REG_GENMASK*() to fixed-width GENMASK_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] test_bits: add tests for __GENMASK() and __GENMASK_ULL() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-13 4:13 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-13 6:00 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-13 13:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] test_bits: add tests for GENMASK_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] test_bits: add tests for BIT_U*() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2025-03-06 13:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 16:08 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 17:55 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-03-07 10:11 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-07 16:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-07 16:47 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-13 4:10 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-06 13:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] bits: Fixed-type GENMASK()/BIT() Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-06 14:56 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-03-06 13:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8nhdz5FZIHYb4Yi@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox