From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] coresight: Consolidate clock enabling
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 11:53:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250506105352.GE177796@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08690315-ce0e-4b2e-b85e-d8b9a82f4b11@arm.com>
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 12:58:06PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
[...]
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> > @@ -1645,6 +1645,51 @@ int coresight_etm_get_trace_id(struct coresight_device *csdev, enum cs_mode mode
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_etm_get_trace_id);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Attempt to find and enable programming clock (pclk) and trace clock (atclk)
> > + * for the given device.
> > + *
> > + * The AMBA bus driver will cover the pclk, to avoid duplicate operations,
> > + * skip to get and enable the pclk for an AMBA device.
> > + *
> > + * atclk is an optional clock, it will be only enabled when it is existed.
> > + * Otherwise, a NULL pointer will be returned to caller.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: '0' on Success; Error code otherwise.
> > + */
> > +int coresight_get_enable_clocks(struct device *dev, struct clk **pclk,
> > + struct clk **atclk)
>
> These arguments probably could be arranged better as pclk and atclk are
> always contained inside 'xxx_drvdata' structure, which could be derived
> from the 'dev' structure itself, if [dev|platform]_set_drvdata() always
> ensured to be called earlier.
Seems to me, the conclusion "pclk and atclk ... could be derived from
the 'dev' structure itself" is not true.
The reason is the coresight_get_enable_clocks() function is located in
the CoreSight core layer, it has no knowledge for driver data
definitions (see etmv4_drvdata, funnel_drvdata, etc). as a result, it
cannot directly access the fields "drvdata->pclk" and "drvdata->atclk".
> Currently there are only two instances where a NULL is being passed to
> indicate that 'atclk' clock is not to be probed or enabled. Could not
> individual clock requirements be passed in a flag argument instead ?
>
> #define CORESIGHT_ENABLE_PCLK 0x1
> #define CORESIGHT_ENABLE_ATCLK 0x2
>
> coresight_get_enable_clocks(struct device *dev, unsigned long flags)
>
> - atclk/pclk derived from drdvata which in turn from dev
> - flags can be checked for pclk/atclk requirements
>
> Even better - as atlck is the only optional clock here, it could just
> have a boolean flag argument to indicate for atclk clock.
>
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON(!pclk);
> > +
> > + if (!dev_is_amba(dev)) {
> > + /*
> > + * "apb_pclk" is the default clock name for an Arm Primecell
> > + * peripheral, while "apb" is used only by the CTCU driver.
> > + *
> > + * For easier maintenance, CoreSight drivers should use
> > + * "apb_pclk" as the programming clock name.
> > + */
> > + *pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb_pclk");
> > + if (IS_ERR(*pclk))
> > + *pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb");
> > + if (IS_ERR(*pclk))
> > + return PTR_ERR(*pclk);
> > + } else {
> > + /* Don't enable pclk for an AMBA device */
> > + *pclk = NULL;
> > + }
>
> Might be better to invert this conditional check as if (dev_is_amba(dev))
> for better readability.
Will refine code for this.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 15:17 [PATCH v2 0/9] coresight: Fix and improve clock usage Leo Yan
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] coresight: tmc: Support atclk Leo Yan
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] coresight: catu: " Leo Yan
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] coresight: etm4x: " Leo Yan
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] coresight: Disable programming clock properly Leo Yan
2025-05-02 6:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-06 9:54 ` Leo Yan
2025-05-07 5:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] coresight: Disable trace bus " Leo Yan
2025-05-02 6:31 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] coresight: Avoid enable programming clock duplicately Leo Yan
2025-05-02 6:38 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-06 9:18 ` Leo Yan
2025-05-07 5:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] coresight: Consolidate clock enabling Leo Yan
2025-05-05 7:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-06 10:53 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-05-07 5:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] coresight: Make clock sequence consistent Leo Yan
2025-05-02 6:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-23 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] coresight: Refactor runtime PM Leo Yan
2025-05-02 8:45 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-06 10:16 ` Leo Yan
2025-05-07 5:39 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250506105352.GE177796@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox