[PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.12.32-rc1

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: use list_first_entry_or_null for opinfo_get_list()

Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
    net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Lower random mac address error print to info

Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
    platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Ignore battery threshold change event notification

Kailang Yang <kailang@realtek.com>
    ALSA: hda/realtek - restore auto-mute mode for Dell Chrome platform

Valtteri Koskivuori <vkoskiv@gmail.com>
    platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Support Lifebook S2110 hotkeys

Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
    NFS: Avoid flushing data while holding directory locks in nfs_rename()

Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@gmail.com>
    char: tpm: tpm-buf: Add sanity check fallback in read helpers

Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
    drm/xe: Save the gt pointer in lrc and drop the tile

Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@intel.com>
    drm/xe/xe2hpg: Add Wa_22021007897

Ilya Guterman <amfernusus@gmail.com>
    nvme-pci: add NVME_QUIRK_NO_DEEPEST_PS quirk for SOLIDIGM P44 Pro

Alessandro Grassi <alessandro.grassi@mailbox.org>
    spi: spi-sun4i: fix early activation

Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>
    phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Fix PHY PLL output 50.25MHz error

Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
    phy: starfive: jh7110-usb: Fix USB 2.0 host occasional detection failure

Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
    drm/amd/display: check stream id dml21 wrapper to get plane_id

George Shen <george.shen@amd.com>
    drm/amd/display: fix link_set_dpms_off multi-display MST corner case

Markus Burri <markus.burri@mt.com>
    gpio: virtuser: fix potential out-of-bound write

Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
    um: let 'make clean' properly clean underlying SUBARCH as well

John Chau <johnchau@0atlas.com>
    platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Support also NEC Lavie X1475JAS

Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
    nfs: don't share pNFS DS connections between net namespaces

Milton Barrera <miltonjosue2001@gmail.com>
    HID: quirks: Add ADATA XPG alpha wireless mouse support

Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@gmail.com>
    dmaengine: idxd: cdev: Fix uninitialized use of sva in idxd_cdev_open

Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
    coredump: hand a pidfd to the usermode coredump helper

Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
    coredump: fix error handling for replace_fd()

Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
    perf/arm-cmn: Add CMN S3 ACPI binding

Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
    perf/arm-cmn: Initialise cmn->cpu earlier

Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
    perf/arm-cmn: Fix REQ2/SNP2 mixup

Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
    net_sched: hfsc: Address reentrant enqueue adding class to eltree twice

Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common: Fix length of serdes_ln_ctrl

Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-j722s-main: Disable "serdes_wiz0" and "serdes_wiz1"

Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-j722s-evm: Enable "serdes_wiz0" and "serdes_wiz1"

Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Add requiried voltage supplies for IMX219

Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Remove clock-names property from IMX219 overlay

Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Add DT nodes for power regulators

Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am68-sk: Fix regulator hierarchy

Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-main: Add missing taps to sdhci0

Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62x: Rename I2C switch to I2C mux in OV5640 overlay

Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62x: Rename I2C switch to I2C mux in IMX219 overlay

Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62x: Remove clock-names property from IMX219 overlay

Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-j722s-common-main: Set eMMC clock parent to default

Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-main: Set eMMC clock parent to default

Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
    arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Set eMMC clock parent to default

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Fix video thermal zone

Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-yoga-slim7x: mark l12b and l15b always-on

Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-qcp: mark l12b and l15b always-on

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-qcp: Fix vreg_l2j_1p2 voltage

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x: Fix vreg_l2j_1p2 voltage

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-asus-vivobook-s15: Fix vreg_l2j_1p2 voltage

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: Add missing properties for cryptobam

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add missing properties for cryptobam

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add missing properties for cryptobam

Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
    arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Fix typo in pil_camera_mem node

Karthik Sanagavarapu <quic_kartsana@quicinc.com>
    arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Remove cdsp compute-cb@10

Ling Xu <quic_lxu5@quicinc.com>
    arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Remove extra entries from the iommus property

Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add missing properties for cryptobam

Axel Forsman <axfo@kvaser.com>
    can: kvaser_pciefd: Force IRQ edge in case of nested IRQ


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |   4 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi              |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi              | 246 ++-------------------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi               |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi               |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi               |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi               |   2 +
 .../boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-asus-vivobook-s15.dts   |   4 +-
 .../boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dts  |   7 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100-qcp.dts          |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi             |  10 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi           |   2 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a-main.dtsi          |   2 -
 .../boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-main.dtsi    |   2 -
 .../arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62x-sk-csi2-imx219.dtso |   3 +-
 .../arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62x-sk-csi2-ov5640.dtso |   2 +-
 .../boot/dts/ti/k3-am62x-sk-csi2-tevi-ov5640.dtso  |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi           |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am68-sk-base-board.dts   |  13 +-
 .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk-csi2-dual-imx219.dtso  |  35 ++-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts             |  31 +++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j722s-evm.dts            |   8 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j722s-main.dtsi          |   4 +
 .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi  |   2 +-
 arch/um/Makefile                                   |   1 +
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c                         |   6 +-
 drivers/dma/idxd/cdev.c                            |   4 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpio-virtuser.c                       |  12 +-
 .../dc/dml2/dml21/dml21_translation_helper.c       |  20 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/link/link_dpms.c    |  13 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h               |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c                        |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc_types.h                  |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa.c                         |   4 +
 drivers/hid/hid-ids.h                              |   4 +
 drivers/hid/hid-quirks.c                           |   2 +
 drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c                    |  83 ++++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c           |   2 +-
 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c                            |   2 +
 drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c                             |  11 +-
 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c  |   2 +
 drivers/phy/starfive/phy-jh7110-usb.c              |   7 +
 drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c              |  33 ++-
 drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c               |   7 +
 drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c                            |   5 +-
 fs/coredump.c                                      |  65 +++++-
 fs/nfs/client.c                                    |   2 +
 fs/nfs/dir.c                                       |  15 +-
 fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayoutdev.c                  |   6 +-
 fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c          |   6 +-
 fs/nfs/pnfs.h                                      |   4 +-
 fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c                                  |   9 +-
 fs/smb/server/oplock.c                             |   7 +-
 include/linux/coredump.h                           |   1 +
 include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h                          |  12 +-
 net/sched/sch_hfsc.c                               |   9 +-
 sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c                      |   5 +-
 57 files changed, 408 insertions(+), 355 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/2/25 06:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Peter Schneider]

Am 02.06.2025 um 15:47 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg 
oddities or regressions found.

Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>


Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider

-- 
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you.                    -- David McCullough Jr.

OpenPGP:  0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Harshit Mogalapalli]

Hi Greg,

On 02/06/25 19:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.


No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.

Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>

Thanks,
Harshit

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 6/2/25 06:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 03:47:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 at 19:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.12.32-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: ce2ebbe0294cb1fbd36bf75316d94f81f26e582b
* git describe: v6.12.31-56-gce2ebbe0294c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.31-56-gce2ebbe0294c

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)

## Test result summary
total: 309879, pass: 285936, fail: 4866, skip: 18494, xfail: 583

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 137 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 56 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 23 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 22 total, 21 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 48 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* perf
* rcutorture
* rt-tests-cyclicdeadline
* rt-tests-pi-stress
* rt-tests-pmqtest
* rt-tests-rt-migrate-test
* rt-tests-signaltest

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Brett Mastbergen]

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 10:05 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Builds successfully.  Boots and works on qemu and Dell XPS 15 9520 w/
Intel Core i7-12600H

Tested-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>

Thanks,
Brett

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 6/2/25 07:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Hardik Garg]

The kernel, bpf tool, and perf tool builds fine for v6.12.32-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.

Kernel binary size for x86 build:
text      data      bss      dec       hex      filename
29859850  17724758  6385664  53970272  3378560  vmlinux

Kernel binary size for arm64 build:
text      data      bss      dec       hex      filename
36415263  15006501  1052880  52474644  320b314  vmlinux


Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>




Thanks,
Hardik

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Failures detected for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.12:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    116 tests:	115 pass, 1 fail

Linux version:	6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
                tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
                tegra30-cardhu-a04

Test failures:	tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh


Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

Hi Greg,

On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
>> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
> 
> Test results for stable-v6.12:
>      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>      116 tests:	115 pass, 1 fail
> 
> Linux version:	6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
> 
> Test failures:	tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh


I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent 
failure that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which 
landed in v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...

# first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq: 
tegra186: Share policy per cluster

I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue 
there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the 
various stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y 
appears to be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on 
v6.6+ kernels for this board). However, the testing is conclusive that 
this change is a problem for v6.12.y.

So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am 
not sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?

Let me know your thoughts.

However, given that this is not a new failure for this stable update we 
can handle in subsequent updates. So for this update ...

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:41:11AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
> 
> Test results for stable-v6.12:
>     10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>     28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>     116 tests:	115 pass, 1 fail
> 
> Linux version:	6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>                 tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>                 tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>                 tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>                 tegra30-cardhu-a04
> 
> Test failures:	tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh

Any hints as to what is causing the failure?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> > > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > 
> > Test results for stable-v6.12:
> >      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
> >      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
> >      116 tests:	115 pass, 1 fail
> > 
> > Linux version:	6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> > Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> >                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> >                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> >                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> >                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > 
> > Test failures:	tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
> 
> 
> I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent failure
> that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which landed in
> v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...
> 
> # first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq:
> tegra186: Share policy per cluster
> 
> I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue
> there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the various
> stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y appears to
> be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on v6.6+ kernels for
> this board). However, the testing is conclusive that this change is a
> problem for v6.12.y.
> 
> So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am not
> sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?

Yes, let's revert it for the older ones as well as it would look odd,
and our tools might notice that we had "skipped" a stable release tree.

Can you send the revert or do you need us to?

> Let me know your thoughts.
> 
> However, given that this is not a new failure for this stable update we can
> handle in subsequent updates. So for this update ...
> 
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Wonderful, thanks for testing!

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On 04/06/2025 10:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:41:11AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
>>> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.12:
>>      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>>      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>>      116 tests:	115 pass, 1 fail
>>
>> Linux version:	6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
>> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>>                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>>                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>>                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Test failures:	tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
> 
> Any hints as to what is causing the failure?


Yes, I had just responded to my initial email reporting the failure with 
the details when you sent this.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On 04/06/2025 11:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
>>>> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>>
>>> Test results for stable-v6.12:
>>>       10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>>>       28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>>>       116 tests:	115 pass, 1 fail
>>>
>>> Linux version:	6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
>>> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>>                   tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>>>                   tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>>>                   tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>>>                   tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>>
>>> Test failures:	tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>>
>>
>> I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent failure
>> that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which landed in
>> v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...
>>
>> # first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq:
>> tegra186: Share policy per cluster
>>
>> I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue
>> there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the various
>> stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y appears to
>> be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on v6.6+ kernels for
>> this board). However, the testing is conclusive that this change is a
>> problem for v6.12.y.
>>
>> So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am not
>> sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?
> 
> Yes, let's revert it for the older ones as well as it would look odd,
> and our tools might notice that we had "skipped" a stable release tree.
> 
> Can you send the revert or do you need us to?

I can no problem. Do you need a revert for each stable branch or just 
one email with the commit to revert for each stable branch?

Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:22:53AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 04/06/2025 11:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> > > > > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > > 
> > > > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > > > 
> > > > Test results for stable-v6.12:
> > > >       10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
> > > >       28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
> > > >       116 tests:	115 pass, 1 fail
> > > > 
> > > > Linux version:	6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> > > > Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> > > >                   tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> > > >                   tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> > > >                   tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> > > >                   tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > > > 
> > > > Test failures:	tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent failure
> > > that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which landed in
> > > v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...
> > > 
> > > # first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq:
> > > tegra186: Share policy per cluster
> > > 
> > > I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue
> > > there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the various
> > > stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y appears to
> > > be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on v6.6+ kernels for
> > > this board). However, the testing is conclusive that this change is a
> > > problem for v6.12.y.
> > > 
> > > So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am not
> > > sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?
> > 
> > Yes, let's revert it for the older ones as well as it would look odd,
> > and our tools might notice that we had "skipped" a stable release tree.
> > 
> > Can you send the revert or do you need us to?
> 
> I can no problem. Do you need a revert for each stable branch or just one
> email with the commit to revert for each stable branch?

Which ever is easier for you, I can handle the git id "fixups" when
applying them to the different branches if you don't want to have to dig
for them.

thanks,

greg k-h