* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-06-02 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-06-02 17:57 ` Peter Schneider
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-06-02 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 6/2/25 06:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-02 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-06-02 17:57 ` Peter Schneider
2025-06-03 6:10 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-06-02 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 02.06.2025 um 15:47 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-02 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-06-02 17:57 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-06-03 6:10 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-06-03 7:36 ` Ron Economos
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2025-06-03 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Hi Greg,
On 02/06/25 19:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-03 6:10 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2025-06-03 7:36 ` Ron Economos
2025-06-03 9:43 ` Mark Brown
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-06-03 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 6/2/25 06:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-03 7:36 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-06-03 9:43 ` Mark Brown
2025-06-03 11:32 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-06-03 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 03:47:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-03 9:43 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-06-03 11:32 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-03 13:51 ` Brett Mastbergen
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-06-03 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 at 19:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.12.32-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: ce2ebbe0294cb1fbd36bf75316d94f81f26e582b
* git describe: v6.12.31-56-gce2ebbe0294c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.31-56-gce2ebbe0294c
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.30-627-g3fc6e1848884)
## Test result summary
total: 309879, pass: 285936, fail: 4866, skip: 18494, xfail: 583
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 137 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 56 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 23 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 22 total, 21 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 48 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* perf
* rcutorture
* rt-tests-cyclicdeadline
* rt-tests-pi-stress
* rt-tests-pmqtest
* rt-tests-rt-migrate-test
* rt-tests-signaltest
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-03 11:32 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-06-03 13:51 ` Brett Mastbergen
2025-06-03 17:10 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brett Mastbergen @ 2025-06-03 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 10:05 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Builds successfully. Boots and works on qemu and Dell XPS 15 9520 w/
Intel Core i7-12600H
Tested-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
Thanks,
Brett
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-03 13:51 ` Brett Mastbergen
@ 2025-06-03 17:10 ` Shuah Khan
2025-06-03 20:33 ` Hardik Garg
2025-06-04 9:41 ` Jon Hunter
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-06-03 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 6/2/25 07:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-03 17:10 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-06-03 20:33 ` Hardik Garg
2025-06-04 9:41 ` Jon Hunter
9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-06-03 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, and perf tool builds fine for v6.12.32-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Kernel binary size for x86 build:
text data bss dec hex filename
29859850 17724758 6385664 53970272 3378560 vmlinux
Kernel binary size for arm64 build:
text data bss dec hex filename
36415263 15006501 1052880 52474644 320b314 vmlinux
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-02 13:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-03 20:33 ` Hardik Garg
@ 2025-06-04 9:41 ` Jon Hunter
2025-06-04 9:57 ` Jon Hunter
2025-06-04 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
9 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-06-04 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Failures detected for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.12:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
Linux version: 6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-04 9:41 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-06-04 9:57 ` Jon Hunter
2025-06-04 10:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-04 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-06-04 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, linux-tegra, stable, Aaron Kling
Hi Greg,
On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
>> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v6.12:
> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>
> Linux version: 6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent
failure that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which
landed in v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...
# first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq:
tegra186: Share policy per cluster
I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue
there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the
various stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y
appears to be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on
v6.6+ kernels for this board). However, the testing is conclusive that
this change is a problem for v6.12.y.
So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am
not sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?
Let me know your thoughts.
However, given that this is not a new failure for this stable update we
can handle in subsequent updates. So for this update ...
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-04 9:57 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-06-04 10:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-04 10:22 ` Jon Hunter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-06-04 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, linux-tegra, stable, Aaron Kling
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> > > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> >
> > Test results for stable-v6.12:
> > 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> > 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
> > 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
> >
> > Linux version: 6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> > tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> > tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> > tegra30-cardhu-a04
> >
> > Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>
>
> I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent failure
> that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which landed in
> v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...
>
> # first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq:
> tegra186: Share policy per cluster
>
> I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue
> there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the various
> stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y appears to
> be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on v6.6+ kernels for
> this board). However, the testing is conclusive that this change is a
> problem for v6.12.y.
>
> So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am not
> sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?
Yes, let's revert it for the older ones as well as it would look odd,
and our tools might notice that we had "skipped" a stable release tree.
Can you send the revert or do you need us to?
> Let me know your thoughts.
>
> However, given that this is not a new failure for this stable update we can
> handle in subsequent updates. So for this update ...
>
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Wonderful, thanks for testing!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-04 10:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-06-04 10:22 ` Jon Hunter
2025-06-04 10:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-06-04 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, linux-tegra, stable, Aaron Kling
On 04/06/2025 11:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
>>>> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>>
>>> Test results for stable-v6.12:
>>> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
>>> 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
>>> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>>>
>>> Linux version: 6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
>>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>> tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>>> tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>>> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>>> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>>
>>> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>>
>>
>> I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent failure
>> that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which landed in
>> v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...
>>
>> # first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq:
>> tegra186: Share policy per cluster
>>
>> I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue
>> there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the various
>> stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y appears to
>> be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on v6.6+ kernels for
>> this board). However, the testing is conclusive that this change is a
>> problem for v6.12.y.
>>
>> So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am not
>> sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?
>
> Yes, let's revert it for the older ones as well as it would look odd,
> and our tools might notice that we had "skipped" a stable release tree.
>
> Can you send the revert or do you need us to?
I can no problem. Do you need a revert for each stable branch or just
one email with the commit to revert for each stable branch?
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-04 10:22 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-06-04 10:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-06-04 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, linux-tegra, stable, Aaron Kling
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:22:53AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2025 11:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On 04/06/2025 10:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> > > > > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > >
> > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > > >
> > > > Test results for stable-v6.12:
> > > > 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> > > > 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
> > > > 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
> > > >
> > > > Linux version: 6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> > > > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> > > > tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> > > > tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> > > > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> > > > tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > > >
> > > > Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
> > >
> > >
> > > I have been looking at this and this appears to be an intermittent failure
> > > that has crept in. Bisect is point to the following change which landed in
> > > v6.12.31 and we did not catch it ...
> > >
> > > # first bad commit: [d95fdee2253e612216e72f29c65b92ec42d254eb] cpufreq:
> > > tegra186: Share policy per cluster
> > >
> > > I have tested v6.15 which has this change and I don't see the same issue
> > > there. I have also tested v6.6.y because this was backported to the various
> > > stable branches and I don't see any problems there. Only v6.12.y appears to
> > > be impacted which is odd (although this test only runs on v6.6+ kernels for
> > > this board). However, the testing is conclusive that this change is a
> > > problem for v6.12.y.
> > >
> > > So I think we do need to revert the above change for v6.12.y but I am not
> > > sure if it makes sense to revert for earlier stable branches too?
> >
> > Yes, let's revert it for the older ones as well as it would look odd,
> > and our tools might notice that we had "skipped" a stable release tree.
> >
> > Can you send the revert or do you need us to?
>
> I can no problem. Do you need a revert for each stable branch or just one
> email with the commit to revert for each stable branch?
Which ever is easier for you, I can handle the git id "fixups" when
applying them to the different branches if you don't want to have to dig
for them.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-04 9:41 ` Jon Hunter
2025-06-04 9:57 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-06-04 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-04 10:20 ` Jon Hunter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-06-04 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, linux-tegra, stable
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:41:11AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
> > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v6.12:
> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>
> Linux version: 6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
Any hints as to what is causing the failure?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/55] 6.12.32-rc1 review
2025-06-04 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-06-04 10:20 ` Jon Hunter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-06-04 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, linux-tegra, stable
On 04/06/2025 10:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:41:11AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.32 release.
>>> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.32-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.12:
>> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
>> 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
>> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>>
>> Linux version: 6.12.32-rc1-gce2ebbe0294c
>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>> tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>> tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>
> Any hints as to what is causing the failure?
Yes, I had just responded to my initial email reporting the failure with
the details when you sent this.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread