From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pankajraghav.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, libaokun1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:16:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110151604.GE2988753@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107144249.435029-25-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 10:42:49PM +0800, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>
> Since block device (See commit 3c20917120ce ("block/bdev: enable large
> folio support for large logical block sizes")) and page cache (See commit
> ab95d23bab220ef8 ("filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page
> cache")) has the ability to have a minimum order when allocating folio,
> and ext4 has supported large folio in commit 7ac67301e82f ("ext4: enable
> large folio for regular file"), now add support for block_size > PAGE_SIZE
> in ext4.
>
> set_blocksize() -> bdev_validate_blocksize() already validates the block
> size, so ext4_load_super() does not need to perform additional checks.
>
> Here we only need to add the FS_LBS bit to fs_flags.
>
> In addition, allocation failures for large folios may trigger warn_alloc()
> warnings. Therefore, as with XFS, mark this feature as experimental.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Could you add:
#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES
EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(blocksize_gt_pagesize);
#endif
in fs/sys/sysfs.c, so that userspace programs (like those in e2fsprogs
and xfstests) can test /sys/fs/ext4/features/... to determine whether
or not blocksize > pagesize is supported? That way we can more easily
determine whether to test the 64k blocksize configurations in
xfstests, and so we can supress the mke2fs warnings:
mke2fs: 65536-byte blocks too big for system (max 4096)
Proceed anyway? (y,N) y
Warning: 65536-byte blocks too big for system (max 4096), forced to continue
... if the feature flag file is present.
Thanks!!
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 14:42 [PATCH v2 00/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_truncate_page() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] ext4: remove PAGE_SIZE checks for rec_len conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] ext4: make ext4_punch_hole() support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] ext4: enable DIOREAD_NOLOCK by default for BS > PS as well libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] ext4: introduce s_min_folio_order for future BS > PS support libaokun
2025-11-10 12:09 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_calculate_overhead() libaokun
2025-11-10 9:36 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_readdir() libaokun
2025-11-10 12:26 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 13:53 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_B macro for logical block to bytes conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_PG and EXT4_PG_TO_LBLK for block/page conversion libaokun
2025-11-10 9:37 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_init_cache() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] ext4: prepare buddy cache inode for BS > PS with large folios libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] ext4: rename 'page' references to 'folio' in multi-block allocator libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mpage_readpages() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_block_write_begin() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_map_and_submit_buffers() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_prepare_extent_to_map() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] ext4: support large block size in __ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] ext4: make data=journal support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10 9:48 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 11:53 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] ext4: support verifying data from large folios with fs-verity libaokun
2025-11-10 9:54 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:08 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] ext4: add checks for large folio incompatibilities when BS > PS libaokun
2025-11-10 9:59 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-10 10:00 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:51 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 15:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 3:31 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:16 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2025-11-11 3:43 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] " Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10 6:18 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:34 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 17:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 23:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12 2:19 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 4:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12 5:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-12 6:27 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 15:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-13 9:14 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 2:49 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110151604.GE2988753@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox