public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	<jack@suse.cz>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel@pankajraghav.com>, <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	<ebiggers@kernel.org>, <willy@infradead.org>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<chengzhihao1@huawei.com>, Baokun Li <libaokun@huaweicloud.com>,
	Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:27:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21efa577-a577-48ce-a82b-bce446539fba@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112040220.GO2988753@mit.edu>

On 2025-11-12 12:02, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:19:06AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
>> I am using a slightly older version of xfstests, and when running the
>> 64k tests I also encountered similar failures. The cover letter stated
>> "no Oops" for the 64k tests rather than "no new failures," meaning that
>> some cases did fail, but no severe issues such as BUG_ON or softlock
>> were observed.
> Sorry, I misread your cover letter.  It's good you are seeing similar
> failures.

Sorry, my description wasn’t clear enough.

>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:49:19AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
>> I checked the code of the swapon syscall in mm/swapfile.c, and currently
>> the swapfile does not support LBS. Therefore, some failing test cases can
>> be filtered out based on this.
> Ah, OK. What's happening is with XFS the swap tests are being skipped
> automatically if the swapon fails.  From _require_scratch_swapfils:
>
> 	*)
> 		if ! swapon "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> 			_scratch_unmount
> 			_notrun "swapfiles are not supported"
> 		fi
> 		;;
>
>
> But ext4 has different logic:
>
> 	# ext* has supported all variants of swap files since their
> 	# introduction, so swapon should not fail.
>
> << famous last words >>
😄
>
> 	case "$FSTYP" in
> 	ext2|ext3|ext4)
> 		if ! swapon "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> 			if _check_s_dax "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" 1 >/dev/null; then
> 				_scratch_unmount
> 				_notrun "swapfiles are not supported"
> 			else
> 				_scratch_unmount
> 				_fail "swapon failed for $FSTYP"
> 			fi
> 		fi
> 		;;
>
>
> I guess we could add logic to _require_scratch_swapfile in common/rc
> to also _notrun if swapon fails and block size is greater that page
> size.  Or I might just add an exclusion in my test appliance runner
> for now for all tests in group swap.

Darrick’s reply in another thread has already made a similar change,
so we can apply that patch first for testing.


Cheers,
Baokun


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 14:42 [PATCH v2 00/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_truncate_page() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] ext4: remove PAGE_SIZE checks for rec_len conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] ext4: make ext4_punch_hole() support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10  9:35   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] ext4: enable DIOREAD_NOLOCK by default for BS > PS as well libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] ext4: introduce s_min_folio_order for future BS > PS support libaokun
2025-11-10 12:09   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_calculate_overhead() libaokun
2025-11-10  9:36   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_readdir() libaokun
2025-11-10 12:26   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 13:53     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_B macro for logical block to bytes conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_PG and EXT4_PG_TO_LBLK for block/page conversion libaokun
2025-11-10  9:37   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_init_cache() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] ext4: prepare buddy cache inode for BS > PS with large folios libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] ext4: rename 'page' references to 'folio' in multi-block allocator libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mpage_readpages() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_block_write_begin() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_map_and_submit_buffers() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_prepare_extent_to_map() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] ext4: support large block size in __ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] ext4: make data=journal support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10  9:48   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 11:53     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] ext4: support verifying data from large folios with fs-verity libaokun
2025-11-10  9:54   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:08     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] ext4: add checks for large folio incompatibilities when BS > PS libaokun
2025-11-10  9:59   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-10 10:00   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:51   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 15:23     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11  3:31     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:16   ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11  3:43     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10  4:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] " Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10  6:18   ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:34   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 17:40     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 23:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12  2:19   ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12  4:02     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12  5:23       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-12  6:27       ` Baokun Li [this message]
2025-11-12 15:29         ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-13  9:14           ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12  2:49   ` Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21efa577-a577-48ce-a82b-bce446539fba@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox