The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
@ 2026-02-09 16:23 Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-02-09 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, anna-maria, mingo,
	juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
	mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto, houwenlong.hwl,
	frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe, ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal,
	max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86, Xie Yuanbin

enter_lazy_tlb() on x86 is short enough, and is called in context
switching, which is the hot code path.

Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 to optimize performance.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c                  | 21 ---------------------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 1acafb1c6a93..ec3f9bebcf7b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -136,8 +136,29 @@ static inline void mm_reset_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
 }
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Please ignore the name of this function.  It should be called
+ * switch_to_kernel_thread().
+ *
+ * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
+ * kernel thread or other context without an mm.  Acceptable implementations
+ * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
+ * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
+ *
+ * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
+ * in a row.  It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
+ * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
+ */
+#ifndef MODULE
+static __always_inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
+		return;
+
+	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
+}
+#endif
 #define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb
-extern void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk);
 
 extern void mm_init_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm);
 extern void mm_free_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 621e09d049cb..af43d177087e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -971,27 +971,6 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
 	}
 }
 
-/*
- * Please ignore the name of this function.  It should be called
- * switch_to_kernel_thread().
- *
- * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
- * kernel thread or other context without an mm.  Acceptable implementations
- * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
- * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
- *
- * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
- * in a row.  It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
- * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
- */
-void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
-		return;
-
-	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
-}
-
 /*
  * Using a temporary mm allows to set temporary mappings that are not accessible
  * by other CPUs. Such mappings are needed to perform sensitive memory writes
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 RESEND 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline
  2026-02-09 16:23 [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-02-09 16:23 ` Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-09 19:24 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Dave Hansen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-02-09 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, anna-maria, mingo,
	juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
	mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto, houwenlong.hwl,
	frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe, ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal,
	max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86, Xie Yuanbin

raw_spin_rq_unlock() is short, and is called in some hot code paths
such as finish_lock_switch.

Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline to optimize performance.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  | 5 -----
 kernel/sched/sched.h | 9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7de5ceb9878b..12d3c42960f2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -687,11 +687,6 @@ bool raw_spin_rq_trylock(struct rq *rq)
 	}
 }
 
-void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
-{
-	raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
-}
-
 /*
  * double_rq_lock - safely lock two runqueues
  */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index b0d920aa0acb..2daa63b760dd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1604,15 +1604,18 @@ extern void raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(struct rq *rq, int subclass)
 extern bool raw_spin_rq_trylock(struct rq *rq)
 	__cond_acquires(true, __rq_lockp(rq));
 
-extern void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
-	__releases(__rq_lockp(rq));
-
 static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock(struct rq *rq)
 	__acquires(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(rq, 0);
 }
 
+static inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
+	__releases(__rq_lockp(rq))
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
+}
+
 static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(struct rq *rq)
 	__acquires(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 RESEND 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline
  2026-02-09 16:23 [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-02-09 16:23 ` Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-09 19:24 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Dave Hansen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-02-09 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd, anna-maria, mingo,
	juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
	mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto, houwenlong.hwl,
	frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe, ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal,
	max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86, Xie Yuanbin

finish_task_switch() is not inlined even in the O2 level optimization,
performance testing indicates that this could lead to a significant
performance degradation when certain Spectre vulnerability mitigations
are enabled.

In switch_mm_irq_off(), some mitigations may clear branch prediction
history, or the instruction cache, like arm64_apply_bp_hardening() on
arm64, BPIALL/ICIALLU on arm, and indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
on x86. finish_task_switch() is right after switch_mm_irqs_off(), the
performance is greatly affected by function calls and branch jumps.

__schedule() has a __sched attribute, which makes it be placed in
'.sched.text' section, while finish_task_switch() does not. This makes
they "far away from each other" in vmlinux, which aggravating the
performance degradation.

Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline to optimize
the performance.

Performance test data - time spent on calling finish_task_switch():
1. x86-64: Intel i5-8300h@4Ghz, DDR4@2666mhz; unit: x86's tsc
 | test scenario                     |    old |   new |           delta |
 | gcc 15.2                          |  27.50 | 25.45 |  -2.05 ( -7.5%) |
 | gcc 15.2     + spectre_v2_user=on |  46.75 | 25.96 | -20.79 (-44.5%) |
 | clang 21.1.7                      |  27.25 | 25.45 |  -1.80 ( -6.6%) |
 | clang 21.1.7 + spectre_v2_user=on |  39.50 | 26.00 | -13.50 (-34.2%) |

2. x86-64: AMD 9600x@5.45Ghz, DDR5@4800mhz; unit: x86's tsc
 | test scenario                     |    old |   new |           delta |
 | gcc 15.2                          |  27.51 | 27.51 |      0 (    0%) |
 | gcc 15.2     + spectre_v2_user=on | 105.21 | 67.89 | -37.32 (-35.5%) |
 | clang 21.1.7                      |  27.51 | 27.51 |      0 (    0%) |
 | clang 21.1.7 + spectre_v2_user=on | 104.15 | 67.52 | -36.63 (-35.2%) |

3. arm64: Raspberry Pi 3b Rev 1.2, Cortex-A53@1.2Ghz; unit: cntvct_el0
 | test scenario                     |    old |   new |           delta |
 | gcc 15.2                          |  1.453 | 1.115 | -0.338 (-23.3%) |
 | clang 21.1.7                      |  1.532 | 1.123 | -0.409 (-26.7%) |

4. arm32: Raspberry Pi 3b Rev 1.2, Cortex-A53@1.2Ghz; unit: cntvct_el0
 | test scenario                     |    old |   new |           delta |
 | gcc 15.2                          |  1.421 | 1.187 | -0.234 (-16.5%) |
 | clang 21.1.7                      |  1.437 | 1.200 | -0.237 (-16.5%) |

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
---
More detailed information about the test can be found in the cover letter:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260124171546.43398-1-qq570070308@gmail.com

 arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h      |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h      |  2 +-
 arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h     |  2 +-
 arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h        |  2 +-
 include/linux/perf_event.h              |  2 +-
 include/linux/sched/mm.h                | 10 +++++-----
 include/linux/tick.h                    |  4 ++--
 include/linux/vtime.h                   |  8 ++++----
 kernel/sched/core.c                     | 12 ++++++------
 kernel/sched/sched.h                    | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 11 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index db2cb06aa8cf..bebde469f81a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
 #ifndef MODULE
 #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
 	finish_arch_post_lock_switch
-static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h
index 9153016da8f1..2fe6b7fe6b12 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sync_core.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  * RISC-V implements return to user-space through an xRET instruction,
  * which is not core serializing.
  */
-static inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
+static __always_inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
 {
 	asm volatile ("fence.i" ::: "memory");
 }
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index d9b8501bc93d..c124ef6a01b3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 }
 
 #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch finish_arch_post_lock_switch
-static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
 {
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
index 78bbacc14d2d..d1967214ef25 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static inline void arch_start_context_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
 }
 
 #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch	finish_arch_post_lock_switch
-static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
 {
 	/* Restore the state of MCDPER register for the new process
 	 * just switched to.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
index 96bda43538ee..4b55fa353bb5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static __always_inline void sync_core(void)
  * to user-mode. x86 implements return to user-space through sysexit,
  * sysrel, and sysretq, which are not core serializing.
  */
-static inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
+static __always_inline void sync_core_before_usermode(void)
 {
 	/* With PTI, we unconditionally serialize before running user code. */
 	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 48d851fbd8ea..7c1dac8da5e5 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_migrate(struct task_struct *task)
 		task->sched_migrated = 1;
 }
 
-static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+static __always_inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
 					    struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	if (static_branch_unlikely(&perf_sched_events))
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index 95d0040df584..4a279ee2d026 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void smp_mb__after_mmgrab(void)
 
 extern void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm);
 
-static inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	/*
 	 * The implicit full barrier implied by atomic_dec_and_test() is
@@ -71,14 +71,14 @@ static inline void __mmdrop_delayed(struct rcu_head *rhp)
  * Invoked from finish_task_switch(). Delegates the heavy lifting on RT
  * kernels via RCU.
  */
-static inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	/* Provides a full memory barrier. See mmdrop() */
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->mm_count))
 		call_rcu(&mm->delayed_drop, __mmdrop_delayed);
 }
 #else
-static inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	mmdrop(mm);
 }
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static inline void mmdrop_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	}
 }
 
-static inline void mmdrop_lazy_tlb_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void mmdrop_lazy_tlb_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU_LAZY_TLB_REFCOUNT))
 		mmdrop_sched(mm);
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ enum {
 #include <asm/membarrier.h>
 #endif
 
-static inline void membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(struct mm_struct *mm)
+static __always_inline void membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	/*
 	 * The atomic_read() below prevents CSE. The following should
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index ac76ae9fa36d..fce16aa10ba2 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
 extern bool tick_nohz_full_running;
 
-static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void)
 {
 	if (!context_tracking_enabled())
 		return false;
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static inline void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void) { }
 static inline void tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask) { }
 #endif
 
-static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
+static __always_inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
 {
 	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
 		__tick_nohz_task_switch();
diff --git a/include/linux/vtime.h b/include/linux/vtime.h
index 29dd5b91dd7d..428464bb81b3 100644
--- a/include/linux/vtime.h
+++ b/include/linux/vtime.h
@@ -67,24 +67,24 @@ static __always_inline void vtime_account_guest_exit(void)
  * For now vtime state is tied to context tracking. We might want to decouple
  * those later if necessary.
  */
-static inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled(void)
 {
 	return context_tracking_enabled();
 }
 
-static inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_cpu(int cpu)
+static __always_inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	return context_tracking_enabled_cpu(cpu);
 }
 
-static inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu(void)
+static __always_inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu(void)
 {
 	return context_tracking_enabled_this_cpu();
 }
 
 extern void vtime_task_switch_generic(struct task_struct *prev);
 
-static inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
+static __always_inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
 {
 	if (vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu())
 		vtime_task_switch_generic(prev);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 12d3c42960f2..d56620c667dd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4889,7 +4889,7 @@ static inline void prepare_task(struct task_struct *next)
 	WRITE_ONCE(next->on_cpu, 1);
 }
 
-static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev)
+static __always_inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev)
 {
 	/*
 	 * This must be the very last reference to @prev from this CPU. After
@@ -4905,7 +4905,7 @@ static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev)
 	smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0);
 }
 
-static void do_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct balance_callback *head)
+static __always_inline void do_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct balance_callback *head)
 {
 	void (*func)(struct rq *rq);
 	struct balance_callback *next;
@@ -4940,7 +4940,7 @@ struct balance_callback balance_push_callback = {
 	.func = balance_push,
 };
 
-static inline struct balance_callback *
+static __always_inline struct balance_callback *
 __splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, bool split)
 {
 	struct balance_callback *head = rq->balance_callback;
@@ -5014,7 +5014,7 @@ prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf
 	__acquire(__rq_lockp(this_rq()));
 }
 
-static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq)
 	__releases(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	/*
@@ -5047,7 +5047,7 @@ static inline void kmap_local_sched_out(void)
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void kmap_local_sched_in(void)
+static __always_inline void kmap_local_sched_in(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL
 	if (unlikely(current->kmap_ctrl.idx))
@@ -5101,7 +5101,7 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
  * past. 'prev == current' is still correct but we need to recalculate this_rq
  * because prev may have moved to another CPU.
  */
-static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
+static __always_inline struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
 	__releases(__rq_lockp(this_rq()))
 {
 	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 2daa63b760dd..0b259e77ac67 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1427,12 +1427,12 @@ static inline struct cpumask *sched_group_span(struct sched_group *sg);
 
 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(__sched_core_enabled);
 
-static inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	return static_branch_unlikely(&__sched_core_enabled) && rq->core_enabled;
 }
 
-static inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
 {
 	return !static_branch_unlikely(&__sched_core_enabled);
 }
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ static inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
  * Be careful with this function; not for general use. The return value isn't
  * stable unless you actually hold a relevant rq->__lock.
  */
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	if (sched_core_enabled(rq))
 		return &rq->core->__lock;
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ static inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
 	return &rq->__lock;
 }
 
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
 	__returns_ctx_lock(rq_lockp(rq)) /* alias them */
 {
 	if (rq->core_enabled)
@@ -1544,12 +1544,12 @@ static inline bool sched_core_disabled(void)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	return &rq->__lock;
 }
 
-static inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
 	__returns_ctx_lock(rq_lockp(rq)) /* alias them */
 {
 	return &rq->__lock;
@@ -1604,33 +1604,33 @@ extern void raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(struct rq *rq, int subclass)
 extern bool raw_spin_rq_trylock(struct rq *rq)
 	__cond_acquires(true, __rq_lockp(rq));
 
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_lock(struct rq *rq)
 	__acquires(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(rq, 0);
 }
 
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
 	__releases(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
 }
 
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_lock_irq(struct rq *rq)
 	__acquires(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	local_irq_disable();
 	raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);
 }
 
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock_irq(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock_irq(struct rq *rq)
 	__releases(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);
 	local_irq_enable();
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long _raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(struct rq *rq)
+static __always_inline unsigned long _raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(struct rq *rq)
 	__acquires(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static inline unsigned long _raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(struct rq *rq)
 	return flags;
 }
 
-static inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore(struct rq *rq, unsigned long flags)
+static __always_inline void raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore(struct rq *rq, unsigned long flags)
 	__releases(__rq_lockp(rq))
 {
 	raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
  2026-02-09 16:23 [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-02-09 19:24 ` Dave Hansen
  2026-02-10 15:32   ` Xie Yuanbin
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2026-02-09 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xie Yuanbin, peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd,
	anna-maria, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
	rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto,
	houwenlong.hwl, frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe,
	ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal, max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86

On 2/9/26 08:23, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> +/*
> + * Please ignore the name of this function.  It should be called
> + * switch_to_kernel_thread().
> + *
> + * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
> + * kernel thread or other context without an mm.  Acceptable implementations
> + * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
> + * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
> + *
> + * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
> + * in a row.  It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
> + * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
> + */
> +#ifndef MODULE

What's with the #ifndef? Is this to avoid use spreading to modules and
then making us export some other gunk? That seems like a generally good
thing, but it's also totally random, different from the existing
'extern' declaration of enter_lazy_tlb(), and unique in the header.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
  2026-02-09 19:24 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Dave Hansen
@ 2026-02-10 15:32   ` Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-10 16:07     ` Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-02-10 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dave.hansen, peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd,
	anna-maria, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
	rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto,
	houwenlong.hwl, frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe,
	ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal, max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86, Xie Yuanbin

On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:24:06 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 2/9/26 08:23, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Please ignore the name of this function.  It should be called
>> + * switch_to_kernel_thread().
>> + *
>> + * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a
>> + * kernel thread or other context without an mm.  Acceptable implementations
>> + * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
>> + * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
>> + *
>> + * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
>> + * in a row.  It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
>> + * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
>> + */
>> +#ifndef MODULE
>
> What's with the #ifndef? Is this to avoid use spreading to modules and
> then making us export some other gunk? That seems like a generally good
> thing, but it's also totally random, different from the existing
> 'extern' declaration of enter_lazy_tlb(), and unique in the header.

This was just to fix a compilation error:
'cpu_tlbstate' is defined in 'include/asm/tlbflush.h' inside of
'#ifndef MODULE'. So if the '#ifndef MODULE' is not added here,
the compilation error will be triggered:
```log
 arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'enter_lazy_tlb':
   arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h:155:27: error: 'cpu_tlbstate' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'cpuhp_state'?
     155 |         if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
         |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~
```

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
  2026-02-10 15:32   ` Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-02-10 16:07     ` Dave Hansen
  2026-02-11 15:36       ` Xie Yuanbin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2026-02-10 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xie Yuanbin, peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd,
	anna-maria, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
	rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto,
	houwenlong.hwl, frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe,
	ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal, max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86

On 2/10/26 07:32, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> This was just to fix a compilation error:
> 'cpu_tlbstate' is defined in 'include/asm/tlbflush.h' inside of
> '#ifndef MODULE'. So if the '#ifndef MODULE' is not added here,
> the compilation error will be triggered:

Rather than sprinkling #ifdefs and 'cpu_tlbstate' references around,
could we try to keep them confined to asm/tlbflush.h as much as
possible, please?

I mean, mmu_context.h _does_ include asm/tlbflush.h, so even if you
stuck enter_lazy_tlb() in asm/tlbflush.h, everything should keep
working, no?

That would both prevent adding a random #ifdef and keep 'cpu_tlbstate'
references limited.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
  2026-02-10 16:07     ` Dave Hansen
@ 2026-02-11 15:36       ` Xie Yuanbin
  2026-02-11 18:01         ` Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-02-11 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dave.hansen, peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd,
	anna-maria, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
	rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto,
	houwenlong.hwl, frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe,
	ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal, max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86, Xie Yuanbin

On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:07:38 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 2/10/26 07:32, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
>> This was just to fix a compilation error:
>> 'cpu_tlbstate' is defined in 'include/asm/tlbflush.h' inside of
>> '#ifndef MODULE'. So if the '#ifndef MODULE' is not added here,
>> the compilation error will be triggered:
>
> Rather than sprinkling #ifdefs and 'cpu_tlbstate' references around,
> could we try to keep them confined to asm/tlbflush.h as much as
> possible, please?
>
> I mean, mmu_context.h _does_ include asm/tlbflush.h, so even if you
> stuck enter_lazy_tlb() in asm/tlbflush.h, everything should keep
> working, no?
>
> That would both prevent adding a random #ifdef and keep 'cpu_tlbstate'
> references limited.

I apologize for misunderstanding your meaning bedore. I tried your
suggestion and there were no compilation warnings or errors:
```patch
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 1acafb1c6a93..ef5b507de34e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static inline void mm_reset_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
 }
 #endif

-#define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb
-extern void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk);
-
 extern void mm_init_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm);
 extern void mm_free_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm);

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 5a3cdc439e38..4bc5eb84e135 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -172,6 +172,15 @@ struct tlb_state_shared {
 };
 DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state_shared, cpu_tlbstate_shared);

+static __always_inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
+		return;
+
+	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
+}
+#define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb
+
 bool nmi_uaccess_okay(void);
 #define nmi_uaccess_okay nmi_uaccess_okay

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 621e09d049cb..55143cbd6cd2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -984,13 +984,6 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
  * in a row.  It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
  * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
  */
-void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
-		return;
-
-	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
-}

 /*
  * Using a temporary mm allows to set temporary mappings that are not accessible
```

However, I'm a little worried that moving
'#define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb' into '#ifndef MODULE' might cause
other issues, so I placed it outside '#ifndef MODULE' outside in my
first patch.

What about this (compilation tested):
```patch
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 1acafb1c6a93..14e776876c69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -136,8 +136,12 @@ static inline void mm_reset_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
 }
 #endif

-#define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb
-extern void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk);
+#define enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk) \
+	do {								\
+		if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)	\
+			break;						\
+		this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);	\
+	} while (0)

 extern void mm_init_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm);
 extern void mm_free_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 621e09d049cb..55143cbd6cd2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -984,13 +984,6 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
  * in a row.  It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by
  * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
  */
-void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
-		return;
-
-	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
-}

 /*
  * Using a temporary mm allows to set temporary mappings that are not accessible
```

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
  2026-02-11 15:36       ` Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-02-11 18:01         ` Dave Hansen
  2026-02-12 15:19           ` Xie Yuanbin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2026-02-11 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xie Yuanbin, peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd,
	anna-maria, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
	rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto,
	houwenlong.hwl, frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe,
	ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal, max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86

On 2/11/26 07:36, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> However, I'm a little worried that moving
> '#define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb' into '#ifndef MODULE' might cause
> other issues, so I placed it outside '#ifndef MODULE' outside in my
> first patch.

What kind of issues?

I mean, if it compiles, it compiles, right? The robots are there to find
the crazy stuff for us.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
  2026-02-11 18:01         ` Dave Hansen
@ 2026-02-12 15:19           ` Xie Yuanbin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-02-12 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dave.hansen, peterz, tglx, riel, segher, david, hpa, arnd,
	anna-maria, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
	rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, bp, dave.hansen, luto,
	houwenlong.hwl, frederic, akpm, lorenzo.stoakes, bhe,
	ryan.roberts, urezki, nysal, max.kellermann
  Cc: linux-kernel, x86, Xie Yuanbin

On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:01:25 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 2/11/26 07:36, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
>> However, I'm a little worried that moving
>> '#define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb' into '#ifndef MODULE' might cause
>> other issues, so I placed it outside '#ifndef MODULE' outside in my
>> first patch.
>
> What kind of issues?
>
> I mean, if it compiles, it compiles, right? The robots are there to find
> the crazy stuff for us.

Ok, thanks. I will send the new patch with your suggestion.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-12 15:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-09 16:23 [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
2026-02-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
2026-02-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline Xie Yuanbin
2026-02-09 19:24 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Dave Hansen
2026-02-10 15:32   ` Xie Yuanbin
2026-02-10 16:07     ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-11 15:36       ` Xie Yuanbin
2026-02-11 18:01         ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-12 15:19           ` Xie Yuanbin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox