From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Probert <linus.probert@gmail.com>
Cc: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] staging: rtl8723bs: remove warnings in rtw_btcoex.h
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 16:22:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026050421-wrench-driver-de6d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177746706634.1273374.11369919005007087628.b4-reply@b4>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 02:51:06PM +0200, Linus Probert wrote:
> On 2026-04-29 14:18:55+02:00, Luka Gejak wrote:
> > On April 29, 2026 2:06:30 PM GMT+02:00, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0200, Luka Gejak wrote:
> > >
> > >Greg has said in the past he prefers them all as separate changes the
> > >way this patchset does it. He recently asked somone to split up a
> > >typedef patch into one typedef per patch.
> > >
> > >regards,
> > >dan carpenter
> >
> > Thanks for that information Dan, I wasn't awear of that.
> > Best regards,
> > Luka Gejak
>
> Thanks, then I did understand your suggestion correctly. Just wasn't
> sure. As Dan stated I've learnt that Greg prefers one commit per function
> for these cases.
Yes, this is great, thanks!
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 17:38 [PATCH 0/8] staging: rtl8723bs: remove warnings in rtw_btcoex.h Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] staging: rtl8723bs: remove blank line " Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] staging: rtl8723bs: add function definition arg names to rtw_btcoex.h Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] staging: rtl8723bs: rename rtw_btcoex_MediaStatusNotify() Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] staging: rtl8723bs: rename rtw_btcoex_media_status_notify definition arg Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_btcoex_HaltNotify() -> rtw_btcoex_halt_notify() Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] staging: rtl8723bs: rename rtw_btcoex_RejectApAggregatedPacket() Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_btcoex_LPS_Enter() -> rtw_btcoex_lps_enter() Linus Probert
2026-04-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] staging: rtl8723bs: rename rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave to rtw_btcoex_lps_leave Linus Probert
2026-04-29 10:18 ` [PATCH 0/8] staging: rtl8723bs: remove warnings in rtw_btcoex.h Luka Gejak
2026-04-29 10:24 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-29 10:46 ` Linus Probert
2026-04-29 11:34 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-29 12:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-04-29 12:18 ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-29 12:51 ` Linus Probert
2026-05-04 14:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026050421-wrench-driver-de6d@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.probert@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox