Re: [PATCH 0/8] staging: rtl8723bs: remove warnings in rtw_btcoex.h

[Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>]

On April 29, 2026 12:46:27 PM GMT+02:00, Linus Probert <linus.probert@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2026-04-29 12:24:53+02:00, Luka Gejak wrote:
>> On April 29, 2026 12:18:12 PM GMT+02:00, Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev> wrote:
>> 
>> >> This series eliminates all remaining checkpatch warnings in
>> >
>> >LGTM, so for the patch series:
>> >
>> >Reviewed-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>> >
>> >Best regards,
>> >Luka Gejak
>> 
>> One note:
>> For the future cleanup series, feel free to squash identical logical 
>> changes into a single patch to keep the commit history concise. It's 
>> up to Greg if he wants v2 but logic is sound as is.
>> Best regards,
>> Luka Gejak
>
>I will make a note of that. In this case what do you consider an
>identical logical change? What would you suggest that I squash?
>
>Br,
>Linus
>

A logical change refers to the type of cleanup being done. In your 
series, patches 3-8 all do the exact same thing: fix CamelCase names 
for functions defined in rtw_btcoex.h. Instead of 6 separate commits, 
those could be squashed into a single patch. But as I already said it 
is up to Greg if he wants v2 or if he wants to keep v1 as is. Either 
way code itself is good.
Best regards,
Luka Gejak