From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: <mingo@elte.hu>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Nick Piggin" <npiggin@suse.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: reduce code duplication in tick spinlock code
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:59:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B800BC.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
include/asm-x86/spinlock.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.27-rc5/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h 2008-08-21 14:37:34.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.27-rc5-x86-spinlock-ticket-shift/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h 2008-08-19 12:43:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -54,19 +54,7 @@
* much between them in performance though, especially as locks are out of line.
*/
#if (NR_CPUS < 256)
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 8) & 0xff) != (tmp & 0xff));
-}
-
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 8) - tmp) & 0xff) > 1;
-}
+#define TICKET_SHIFT 8
static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
@@ -116,19 +104,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
: "memory", "cc");
}
#else
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 16) & 0xffff) != (tmp & 0xffff));
-}
-
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 16) - tmp) & 0xffff) > 1;
-}
+#define TICKET_SHIFT 16
static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
@@ -182,6 +158,20 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
}
#endif
+static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
+
+ return !!(((tmp >> TICKET_SHIFT) ^ tmp) & ((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1));
+}
+
+static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
+
+ return (((tmp >> TICKET_SHIFT) - tmp) & ((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1)) > 1;
+}
+
#define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock)
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B800BC.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox