public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86: reduce code duplication in tick spinlock code
@ 2008-08-29 11:59 Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2008-08-29 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mingo, tglx, hpa; +Cc: Nick Piggin, linux-kernel

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

---
 include/asm-x86/spinlock.h |   42 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.27-rc5/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h	2008-08-21 14:37:34.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.27-rc5-x86-spinlock-ticket-shift/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h	2008-08-19 12:43:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -54,19 +54,7 @@
  * much between them in performance though, especially as locks are out of line.
  */
 #if (NR_CPUS < 256)
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
-	return (((tmp >> 8) & 0xff) != (tmp & 0xff));
-}
-
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
-	return (((tmp >> 8) - tmp) & 0xff) > 1;
-}
+#define TICKET_SHIFT 8
 
 static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
@@ -116,19 +104,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
 		     : "memory", "cc");
 }
 #else
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
-	return (((tmp >> 16) & 0xffff) != (tmp & 0xffff));
-}
-
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
-	return (((tmp >> 16) - tmp) & 0xffff) > 1;
-}
+#define TICKET_SHIFT 16
 
 static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
@@ -182,6 +158,20 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
+
+	return !!(((tmp >> TICKET_SHIFT) ^ tmp) & ((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1));
+}
+
+static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
+
+	return (((tmp >> TICKET_SHIFT) - tmp) & ((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1)) > 1;
+}
+
 #define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-08-29 11:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-29 11:59 [PATCH] x86: reduce code duplication in tick spinlock code Jan Beulich

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox