* [PATCH] x86: reduce code duplication in tick spinlock code
@ 2008-08-29 11:59 Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2008-08-29 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, tglx, hpa; +Cc: Nick Piggin, linux-kernel
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
include/asm-x86/spinlock.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.27-rc5/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h 2008-08-21 14:37:34.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.27-rc5-x86-spinlock-ticket-shift/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h 2008-08-19 12:43:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -54,19 +54,7 @@
* much between them in performance though, especially as locks are out of line.
*/
#if (NR_CPUS < 256)
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 8) & 0xff) != (tmp & 0xff));
-}
-
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 8) - tmp) & 0xff) > 1;
-}
+#define TICKET_SHIFT 8
static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
@@ -116,19 +104,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
: "memory", "cc");
}
#else
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 16) & 0xffff) != (tmp & 0xffff));
-}
-
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
-
- return (((tmp >> 16) - tmp) & 0xffff) > 1;
-}
+#define TICKET_SHIFT 16
static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
@@ -182,6 +158,20 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spi
}
#endif
+static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
+
+ return !!(((tmp >> TICKET_SHIFT) ^ tmp) & ((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1));
+}
+
+static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
+
+ return (((tmp >> TICKET_SHIFT) - tmp) & ((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1)) > 1;
+}
+
#define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock)
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-08-29 11:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-29 11:59 [PATCH] x86: reduce code duplication in tick spinlock code Jan Beulich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox