From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Drop SUCCESS and FAIL enums
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:05:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a5b00ae-f5e7-4642-8ba2-e5f2f472a794@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <086f6284-46b8-4cb1-8b19-009ee0e10af3@amd.com>
On 2/24/2025 00:05, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> On 2/20/2025 2:32 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>
>> Enums are effectively used as a boolean and don't show
>> the return value of the failing call.
>>
>> Instead of using enums switch to returning the actual return
>> code from the unit test.
>>
>
> One query below, apart from that LGTM,
>
> Reviewed-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Thanks!
>
>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 143 ++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> index 0f0b867e271cc..028527a0019ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> @@ -32,30 +32,20 @@
>>
>> #include "amd-pstate.h"
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Abbreviations:
>> - * amd_pstate_ut: used as a shortform for AMD P-State unit test.
>> - * It helps to keep variable names smaller, simpler
>> - */
>> -enum amd_pstate_ut_result {
>> - AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS,
>> - AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL,
>> -};
>>
>> struct amd_pstate_ut_struct {
>> const char *name;
>> - void (*func)(u32 index);
>> - enum amd_pstate_ut_result result;
>> + int (*func)(u32 index);
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> * Kernel module for testing the AMD P-State unit test
>> */
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_acpi_cpc_valid(u32 index);
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_check_enabled(u32 index);
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index);
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index);
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_check_driver(u32 index);
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_acpi_cpc_valid(u32 index);
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_check_enabled(u32 index);
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index);
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index);
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_check_driver(u32 index);
>>
>> static struct amd_pstate_ut_struct amd_pstate_ut_cases[] = {
>> {"amd_pstate_ut_acpi_cpc_valid", amd_pstate_ut_acpi_cpc_valid },
>> @@ -78,51 +68,46 @@ static bool get_shared_mem(void)
>> /*
>> * check the _CPC object is present in SBIOS.
>> */
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_acpi_cpc_valid(u32 index)
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_acpi_cpc_valid(u32 index)
>> {
>> - if (acpi_cpc_valid())
>> - amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>> - else {
>> - amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>> + if (!acpi_cpc_valid()) {
>> pr_err("%s the _CPC object is not present in SBIOS!\n", __func__);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_pstate_enable(u32 index)
>> +/*
>> + * check if amd pstate is enabled
>> + */
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_check_enabled(u32 index)
>> {
>> - int ret = 0;
>> u64 cppc_enable = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (get_shared_mem())
>> + return 0;
>
> What do you think about adding a "cppc_get_enable()" function in acpi_cppc.c so that we can
> run this check for shared mem systems as well ?
>
I think it's a good idea. Would you mind working that out for after
this series lands?
> Thanks,
> Dhananjay
>
>>
>> ret = rdmsrl_safe(MSR_AMD_CPPC_ENABLE, &cppc_enable);
>> if (ret) {
>> - amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>> pr_err("%s rdmsrl_safe MSR_AMD_CPPC_ENABLE ret=%d error!\n", __func__, ret);
>> - return;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> - if (cppc_enable)
>> - amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>> - else {
>> - amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>> +
>> + if (!cppc_enable) {
>> pr_err("%s amd pstate must be enabled!\n", __func__);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> -}
>>
>> -/*
>> - * check if amd pstate is enabled
>> - */
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_check_enabled(u32 index)
>> -{
>> - if (get_shared_mem())
>> - amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>> - else
>> - amd_pstate_ut_pstate_enable(index);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> * check if performance values are reasonable.
>> * highest_perf >= nominal_perf > lowest_nonlinear_perf > lowest_perf > 0
>> */
>> -static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
>> +static int amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
>> {
>> int cpu = 0, ret = 0;
>> u32 highest_perf = 0, nominal_perf = 0, lowest_nonlinear_perf = 0, lowest_perf = 0;
> [Snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 21:02 [PATCH v4 00/19] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Invalidate cppc_req_cached during suspend Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 4:51 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 5:01 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 5:23 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Allow lowest nonlinear and lowest to be the same Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 5:26 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Drop SUCCESS and FAIL enums Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 6:05 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-25 0:05 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-02-25 4:07 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Run on all of the correct CPUs Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 6:09 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Adjust variable scope for amd_pstate_ut_check_freq() Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 9:21 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-24 23:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-25 4:50 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-19 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello
2025-02-19 21:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop amd_pstate_epp_cpu_offline() Mario Limonciello
2025-02-24 9:25 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-24 23:46 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a5b00ae-f5e7-4642-8ba2-e5f2f472a794@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox