public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>,
	Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@quicinc.com>,
	Jian-Min <Jian-Min.Liu@mediatek.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/pelt: Introduce PELT multiplier
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:02:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwyOzgbbUbB+JmSH@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ywxz7cuR+/+1CFMR@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 07:54:50AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > 
> > The new sysctl sched_pelt_multiplier allows a user to set a clock
> > multiplier to x2 or x4 (x1 being the default). This clock multiplier
> > artificially speeds up PELT ramp up/down similarly to use a faster
> > half-life than the default 32ms.
> > 
> >   - x1: 32ms half-life
> >   - x2: 16ms half-life
> >   - x4: 8ms  half-life
> > 
> > Internally, a new clock is created: rq->clock_task_mult. It sits in the
> > clock hierarchy between rq->clock_task and rq->clock_pelt.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> 
> > +extern unsigned int sched_pelt_lshift;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * absolute time   |1      |2      |3      |4      |5      |6      |
> > + * @ mult = 1      --------****************--------****************-
> > + * @ mult = 2      --------********----------------********---------
> > + * @ mult = 4      --------****--------------------****-------------
> > + * clock task mult
> > + * @ mult = 2      |   |   |2  |3  |   |   |   |   |5  |6  |   |   |
> > + * @ mult = 4      | | | | |2|3| | | | | | | | | | |5|6| | | | | | |
> > + *
> > + */
> > +static inline void update_rq_clock_task_mult(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
> > +{
> > +	delta <<= READ_ONCE(sched_pelt_lshift);
> > +
> > +	rq->clock_task_mult += delta;
> > +
> > +	update_rq_clock_pelt(rq, delta);
> > +}
> 
> Hurmph... I'd almost go write you something like
> static_call()/static_branch() but for immediates.
> 
> That said; given there's only like 3 options, perhaps a few
> static_branch() instances work just fine ?

Also, I'm not at all sure about exposing that as an official sysctl.

How about something like so?

---
Subject: sched/pelt: Introduce PELT multiplier
From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 07:54:50 +0200

From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>

The new sysctl sched_pelt_multiplier allows a user to set a clock
multiplier to x2 or x4 (x1 being the default). This clock multiplier
artificially speeds up PELT ramp up/down similarly to use a faster
half-life than the default 32ms.

  - x1: 32ms half-life
  - x2: 16ms half-life
  - x4: 8ms  half-life

Internally, a new clock is created: rq->clock_task_mult. It sits in the
clock hierarchy between rq->clock_task and rq->clock_pelt.

[peterz: Use sched_feat()]
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     |    2 +-
 kernel/sched/features.h |    3 +++
 kernel/sched/pelt.h     |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |    1 +
 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct
 	if ((irq_delta + steal) && sched_feat(NONTASK_CAPACITY))
 		update_irq_load_avg(rq, irq_delta + steal);
 #endif
-	update_rq_clock_pelt(rq, delta);
+	update_rq_clock_task_mult(rq, delta);
 }
 
 void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -101,3 +101,6 @@ SCHED_FEAT(LATENCY_WARN, false)
 
 SCHED_FEAT(ALT_PERIOD, true)
 SCHED_FEAT(BASE_SLICE, true)
+
+SCHED_FEAT(PELT_M2, false)
+SCHED_FEAT(PELT_M4, false)
--- a/kernel/sched/pelt.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
@@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(st
 	WRITE_ONCE(avg->util_est.enqueued, enqueued);
 }
 
+static inline u64 rq_clock_task_mult(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
+	assert_clock_updated(rq);
+
+	return rq->clock_task_mult;
+}
+
 static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
@@ -72,7 +80,7 @@ static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct r
 /* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
 static inline void _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
+	rq->clock_pelt = rq_clock_task_mult(rq);
 
 	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_idle, rq_clock(rq));
 	/* Paired with smp_rmb in migrate_se_pelt_lag() */
@@ -121,6 +129,30 @@ static inline void update_rq_clock_pelt(
 	rq->clock_pelt += delta;
 }
 
+extern unsigned int sched_pelt_lshift;
+
+/*
+ * absolute time   |1      |2      |3      |4      |5      |6      |
+ * @ mult = 1      --------****************--------****************-
+ * @ mult = 2      --------********----------------********---------
+ * @ mult = 4      --------****--------------------****-------------
+ * clock task mult
+ * @ mult = 2      |   |   |2  |3  |   |   |   |   |5  |6  |   |   |
+ * @ mult = 4      | | | | |2|3| | | | | | | | | | |5|6| | | | | | |
+ *
+ */
+static inline void update_rq_clock_task_mult(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
+{
+	if (sched_feat(PELT_M2))
+		delta *= 2;
+	if (sched_feat(PELT_M4))
+		delta *= 4;
+
+	rq->clock_task_mult += delta;
+
+	update_rq_clock_pelt(rq, delta);
+}
+
 /*
  * When rq becomes idle, we have to check if it has lost idle time
  * because it was fully busy. A rq is fully used when the /Sum util_sum
@@ -147,7 +179,7 @@ static inline void update_idle_rq_clock_
 	 * rq's clock_task.
 	 */
 	if (util_sum >= divider)
-		rq->lost_idle_time += rq_clock_task(rq) - rq->clock_pelt;
+		rq->lost_idle_time += rq_clock_task_mult(rq) - rq->clock_pelt;
 
 	_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
 }
@@ -218,13 +250,18 @@ update_irq_load_avg(struct rq *rq, u64 r
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
+static inline u64 rq_clock_task_mult(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	return rq_clock_task(rq);
 }
 
+static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	return rq_clock_task_mult(rq);
+}
+
 static inline void
-update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta) { }
+update_rq_clock_task_mult(struct rq *rq, s64 delta) { }
 
 static inline void
 update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq) { }
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ struct rq {
 	u64			clock;
 	/* Ensure that all clocks are in the same cache line */
 	u64			clock_task ____cacheline_aligned;
+	u64			clock_task_mult;
 	u64			clock_pelt;
 	unsigned long		lost_idle_time;
 	u64			clock_pelt_idle;

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29  5:54 [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched/pelt: Change PELT halflife at runtime Dietmar Eggemann
2022-08-29  5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/pelt: Introduce PELT multiplier Dietmar Eggemann
2022-08-29  8:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:02     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-08-29 10:13       ` Vincent Guittot
2022-08-29 14:23         ` Quentin Perret
2022-08-29 14:34           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 15:31             ` Quentin Perret
2022-08-29 15:48             ` Quentin Perret
2022-09-02  7:53         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-09-02  8:45           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-06  5:49           ` Vincent Guittot
2022-09-08  6:50             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-09-02  7:53       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-09-02  8:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-20 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched/pelt: Change PELT halflife at runtime Jian-Min Liu
2022-09-28 17:09   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-09-29  9:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-29 11:07     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-09-29 11:10     ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-09-29 11:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-29 14:41         ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-10-03 22:57           ` Wei Wang
2022-10-04  9:33             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-10-05 16:57               ` Wei Wang
2022-11-07 13:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-08 19:48             ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-09 15:49               ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-10 13:25                 ` Qais Yousef
2023-02-07 10:29                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-02-09 16:16                   ` Vincent Guittot
2023-02-17 13:54                     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-02-20 13:54                       ` Vincent Guittot
2023-02-21  9:29                         ` Vincent Guittot
2023-02-22 20:28                           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-03-01 10:24                             ` Vincent Guittot
2023-02-22 20:13                         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-03-02 19:36                           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-02-20 10:13                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-20 13:39                       ` Vincent Guittot
2023-02-23 15:37                     ` Qais Yousef
2023-03-01 10:39                       ` Vincent Guittot
2023-03-01 17:24                         ` Qais Yousef
2023-03-02  8:00                           ` Vincent Guittot
2023-03-02 19:39                             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-03-06 19:11                             ` Qais Yousef
2023-03-07 13:22                               ` Vincent Guittot
2023-03-11 16:55                                 ` Qais Yousef
2023-03-23 16:29                           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-04-03 14:45                             ` Qais Yousef
2023-04-06 15:58                               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-04-11 17:51                                 ` Qais Yousef
2022-11-09 15:18             ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-10 11:16             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-11-10 13:05               ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-10 14:59                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-11-10 17:51                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-30 18:14                     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-01 13:37                       ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-11-10 12:45             ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-11-07  9:41     ` Jian-Min Liu (劉建旻)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwyOzgbbUbB+JmSH@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Jian-Min.Liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=adharmap@quicinc.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox