Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] leds: rgb: leds-qcom-lpg: PWM fixes

[Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>]

On 25-03-04 07:29:46, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:52:49PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > The PWM allow configuring the PWM resolution from 8 bits PWM
> > values up to 15 bits values, for the Hi-Res PWMs, and then either
> > 6-bit or 9-bit for the normal PWMs. The current implementation loops
> > through all possible resolutions (PWM sizes), for the PWM subtype, on top
> > of the already existing process of determining the prediv, exponent and
> > refclk.
> > 
> > The first and second issues are related to capping the computed PWM
> > value.
> 
> I just took a very quick look. I'd say squash the first and second patch
> into a single one. Splitting a change that fixes the same issue in the
> two branches of an if condition has no benefit.

Actually, the first two patches fix different commits.
The first patch fixes a commit that is only in linux-next for now,
while the second patch fixes a commit that has been merged in 6.4.

So they need to be separate patches.

> 
> Other than that this patch set would also benefit from what I wrote in
> the review of the other patch you send: Please mention a request where
> the result becomes wrong. This considerably simplifies understanding
> your changes.

Sure. Will describe the 5ms vs 4.26ms period scenario. Hope that's OK.

> 
> Thanks
> Uwe

Thanks for reviewing,
Abel