public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] objtool: Improve code generation for annotation macros
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:59:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTBecRhz5qN8O1UX@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251126100050.GT4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 10:06:56PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > For tip/objtool/core.
> > 
> > As much as possible, undo the code generation damage introduced by
> > ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL:
> > 
> >   - Remove its usage in favor of SHF_MERGE + sh_entsize, where possible
> > 
> >   - Print the annotation on a single line:
> > 
> >       912: .pushsection ".discard.annotate_data", "M", @progbits, 8; .long 912b - .; .long 1; .popsection
> > 
> >   - Remove the trailing newline/tab; let the invoking code decide on the
> >     appropriate separator for the given context
> > 
> > Josh Poimboeuf (4):
> >   x86/alternative: Remove ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL usage
> >   x86/asm: Remove ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL usage
> >   objtool: Consolidate annotation macros
> >   objtool: Remove newlines and tabs from annotation macros
> 
> Durr, this will conflict with tip/core/bugs. Let me ponder this a bit.

So Josh has resolved these conflicts based on latest -git
which has all these moving pieces integrated into a single
tree, so I've applied these fixes to tip:objtool/urgent.

Thanks,

	Ingo


      reply	other threads:[~2025-12-03 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-26  6:06 [PATCH 0/4] objtool: Improve code generation for annotation macros Josh Poimboeuf
2025-11-26  6:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/alternative: Remove ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL usage Josh Poimboeuf
2025-11-26  6:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/asm: " Josh Poimboeuf
2025-11-26  6:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] objtool: Consolidate annotation macros Josh Poimboeuf
2025-11-26  6:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] objtool: Remove newlines and tabs from " Josh Poimboeuf
2025-11-26 10:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] objtool: Improve code generation for " Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-03 15:59   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTBecRhz5qN8O1UX@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox