From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] tpm_crb: Implement command and response chunking logic
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 17:53:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af9Kf671p1ocUwYY@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324181244.17741-4-armenon@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:42:42PM +0530, Arun Menon wrote:
> With the introduction of support for Post Quantum Cryptography
> algorithms in TPM, the commands and responses will grow in size.
> Some TPMs have a physical hardware memory window (MMIO) that is
> smaller than the commands we need to send. Therefore this commit
> implements the core logic of sending/receiving data in chunks.
>
> Instead of sending the whole command at once, the driver now sends it in
> small chunks. After each chunk, it signals the TPM using a nextChunk
> signal, and waits for the TPM to consume the data. Once the final piece
> is delivered, the driver signals the TPM to begin execution by toggling
> the start invoke bit. We use the same logic in reverse to read large
> responses from the TPM.
>
> This allows the driver to handle large payloads even when the hardware
> interface has limited memory. This kernel-side support corresponds to
> the backend implementation in QEMU [1]. QEMU reassembles the chunks
> before passing them to the TPM emulator.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260319135316.37412-1-armenon@redhat.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
> ---
This is really bad at rationalizing the code change, which are heavy.
Couldn't you instead:
1. Rename crb_recv as tpm_crb_recv_no_chunks().
2. Add tpm_crb_recv_chunks().
3. Add new tpm_crb_recv(), which delegates either.
I would not mind too much if they have some duplicate logic. It's less
of a harm than convolution caused by interleaving.
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index 922bcf7a69ad5..a97fc5e9927e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -104,11 +104,13 @@ struct crb_priv {
> u8 __iomem *cmd;
> u8 __iomem *rsp;
> u32 cmd_size;
> + u32 rsp_size;
> u32 smc_func_id;
> u32 __iomem *pluton_start_addr;
> u32 __iomem *pluton_reply_addr;
> u8 ffa_flags;
> u8 ffa_attributes;
> + bool chunking_supported;
Why not "u32 intf_id" i.e. cache the value of the register?
> };
>
> struct tpm2_crb_smc {
> @@ -368,38 +370,6 @@ static u8 crb_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> return sts;
> }
>
> -static int crb_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> -{
> - struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> - unsigned int expected;
> -
> - /* A sanity check that the upper layer wants to get at least the header
> - * as that is the minimum size for any TPM response.
> - */
> - if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> - return -EIO;
> -
> - /* If this bit is set, according to the spec, the TPM is in
> - * unrecoverable condition.
> - */
> - if (ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_sts) & CRB_CTRL_STS_ERROR)
> - return -EIO;
> -
> - /* Read the first 8 bytes in order to get the length of the response.
> - * We read exactly a quad word in order to make sure that the remaining
> - * reads will be aligned.
> - */
> - memcpy_fromio(buf, priv->rsp, 8);
> -
> - expected = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf[2]);
> - if (expected > count || expected < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> - return -EIO;
> -
> - memcpy_fromio(&buf[8], &priv->rsp[8], expected - 8);
> -
> - return expected;
> -}
> -
> static int crb_do_acpi_start(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> union acpi_object *obj;
> @@ -474,6 +444,8 @@ static int crb_trigger_tpm(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 start_cmd)
> static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> {
> struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> + size_t offset = 0;
> + size_t chunk_size;
> int rc = 0;
>
> /* Zero the cancel register so that the next command will not get
> @@ -481,7 +453,7 @@ static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> */
> iowrite32(0, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_cancel);
>
> - if (len > priv->cmd_size) {
> + if (len > priv->cmd_size && !priv->chunking_supported) {
> dev_err(&chip->dev, "invalid command count value %zd %d\n",
> len, priv->cmd_size);
> return -E2BIG;
> @@ -491,18 +463,108 @@ static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_PLUTON)
> __crb_cmd_ready(&chip->dev, priv, chip->locality);
>
> - memcpy_toio(priv->cmd, buf, len);
> + while (offset < len) {
> + chunk_size = min_t(size_t, len - offset, priv->cmd_size);
>
> - /* Make sure that cmd is populated before issuing start. */
> - wmb();
> -
> - rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_INVOKE);
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> + if (chunk_size == 0)
> + break;
>
> + memcpy_toio(priv->cmd, buf + offset, chunk_size);
> + offset += chunk_size;
> +
> + /* Make sure that cmd is populated before issuing start. */
> + wmb();
> + if (offset < len) {
> + rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> + if (!crb_wait_for_reg_32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_start,
> + CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK, 0, TPM2_TIMEOUT_C)) {
> + dev_err(&chip->dev,
> + "Timeout waiting for backend to consume chunk\n");
> + return -ETIME;
> + }
> + } else {
> + rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_INVOKE);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> + }
> + }
> return crb_try_pluton_doorbell(priv, false);
> }
>
> +static int crb_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> + unsigned int expected;
> + size_t offset = 0;
> + size_t chunk_size;
> + size_t first_read;
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* A sanity check that the upper layer wants to get at least the header
> + * as that is the minimum size for any TPM response.
> + */
> + if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + /* If this bit is set, according to the spec, the TPM is in
> + * unrecoverable condition.
> + */
> + if (ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_sts) & CRB_CTRL_STS_ERROR)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + /* Read the first 8 bytes in order to get the length of the response.
> + * We read exactly a quad word in order to make sure that the remaining
> + * reads will be aligned.
> + */
> + memcpy_fromio(buf, priv->rsp, 8);
> +
> + expected = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf[2]);
> + if (expected > count || expected < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set chunk_size by comparing the size of the buffer that the upper layer has
> + * allocated (count) to the hardware tpm limit (priv->rsp_size).
> + * This is to prevent buffer overflow while writing to buf.
> + */
> + chunk_size = min_t(size_t, count, priv->rsp_size);
> + if (chunk_size < 8)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + /*
> + * Compare the actual size of the response we found in the header to the chunk_size.
> + */
> + first_read = min_t(size_t, expected, chunk_size);
> +
> + memcpy_fromio(&buf[8], &priv->rsp[8], first_read - 8);
> + offset = first_read;
> +
> + while (offset < expected) {
> + if (!priv->chunking_supported) {
> + dev_err(&chip->dev, "Response larger than MMIO and chunking not supported\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (!crb_wait_for_reg_32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_start,
> + CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK, 0, TPM2_TIMEOUT_C)) {
> + dev_err(&chip->dev, "Timeout waiting for backend response\n");
> + return -ETIME;
> + }
> +
> + chunk_size = min_t(size_t, expected - offset, priv->rsp_size);
> + memcpy_fromio(buf + offset, priv->rsp, chunk_size);
> + offset += chunk_size;
> + }
> +
> + return expected;
> +}
> +
> static void crb_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> @@ -727,6 +789,15 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (priv->regs_h) {
> + u32 intf_id = ioread32((u32 __iomem *)&priv->regs_h->intf_id);
> +
> + if (intf_id & CRB_INTF_CAP_CRB_CHUNK) {
> + priv->chunking_supported = true;
> + dev_info(dev, "CRB Chunking is supported by backend\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> memcpy_fromio(&__rsp_pa, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_rsp_pa, 8);
> rsp_pa = le64_to_cpu(__rsp_pa);
> rsp_size = ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_rsp_size);
> @@ -764,8 +835,10 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> priv->rsp = priv->cmd;
>
> out:
> - if (!ret)
> + if (!ret) {
> priv->cmd_size = cmd_size;
> + priv->rsp_size = rsp_size;
> + }
>
> __crb_go_idle(dev, priv, 0);
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-09 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260324181244.17741-1-armenon@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-2-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:41 ` [RFC v2 1/5] tpm_crb: Add register definitions of TPM CRB chunking fields Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-3-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:43 ` [RFC v2 2/5] tpm_crb: Add new wrapper function to invoke start method Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-13 11:08 ` Arun Menon
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-4-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-05-13 11:07 ` [RFC v2 3/5] tpm_crb: Implement command and response chunking logic Arun Menon
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-5-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:54 ` [RFC v2 4/5] tpm: Increase TPM_BUFSIZE to 8kB for chunking support Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-09 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-13 11:06 ` Arun Menon
2026-05-13 11:09 ` Arun Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af9Kf671p1ocUwYY@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=armenon@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox