From: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] tpm_crb: Implement command and response chunking logic
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 16:37:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agRbXSvz5YyyCX_o@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af9Kf671p1ocUwYY@kernel.org>
On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 05:53:51PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:42:42PM +0530, Arun Menon wrote:
> > With the introduction of support for Post Quantum Cryptography
> > algorithms in TPM, the commands and responses will grow in size.
> > Some TPMs have a physical hardware memory window (MMIO) that is
> > smaller than the commands we need to send. Therefore this commit
> > implements the core logic of sending/receiving data in chunks.
> >
> > Instead of sending the whole command at once, the driver now sends it in
> > small chunks. After each chunk, it signals the TPM using a nextChunk
> > signal, and waits for the TPM to consume the data. Once the final piece
> > is delivered, the driver signals the TPM to begin execution by toggling
> > the start invoke bit. We use the same logic in reverse to read large
> > responses from the TPM.
> >
> > This allows the driver to handle large payloads even when the hardware
> > interface has limited memory. This kernel-side support corresponds to
> > the backend implementation in QEMU [1]. QEMU reassembles the chunks
> > before passing them to the TPM emulator.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260319135316.37412-1-armenon@redhat.com/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
> > ---
>
> This is really bad at rationalizing the code change, which are heavy.
>
> Couldn't you instead:
>
> 1. Rename crb_recv as tpm_crb_recv_no_chunks().
> 2. Add tpm_crb_recv_chunks().
> 3. Add new tpm_crb_recv(), which delegates either.
>
> I would not mind too much if they have some duplicate logic. It's less
> of a harm than convolution caused by interleaving.
Sure. I will amend this in v3.
Thank you.
>
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > index 922bcf7a69ad5..a97fc5e9927e3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > @@ -104,11 +104,13 @@ struct crb_priv {
> > u8 __iomem *cmd;
> > u8 __iomem *rsp;
> > u32 cmd_size;
> > + u32 rsp_size;
> > u32 smc_func_id;
> > u32 __iomem *pluton_start_addr;
> > u32 __iomem *pluton_reply_addr;
> > u8 ffa_flags;
> > u8 ffa_attributes;
> > + bool chunking_supported;
>
> Why not "u32 intf_id" i.e. cache the value of the register?
>
> > };
> >
> > struct tpm2_crb_smc {
> > @@ -368,38 +370,6 @@ static u8 crb_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > return sts;
> > }
> >
> > -static int crb_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> > -{
> > - struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > - unsigned int expected;
> > -
> > - /* A sanity check that the upper layer wants to get at least the header
> > - * as that is the minimum size for any TPM response.
> > - */
> > - if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> > - return -EIO;
> > -
> > - /* If this bit is set, according to the spec, the TPM is in
> > - * unrecoverable condition.
> > - */
> > - if (ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_sts) & CRB_CTRL_STS_ERROR)
> > - return -EIO;
> > -
> > - /* Read the first 8 bytes in order to get the length of the response.
> > - * We read exactly a quad word in order to make sure that the remaining
> > - * reads will be aligned.
> > - */
> > - memcpy_fromio(buf, priv->rsp, 8);
> > -
> > - expected = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf[2]);
> > - if (expected > count || expected < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> > - return -EIO;
> > -
> > - memcpy_fromio(&buf[8], &priv->rsp[8], expected - 8);
> > -
> > - return expected;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int crb_do_acpi_start(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > {
> > union acpi_object *obj;
> > @@ -474,6 +444,8 @@ static int crb_trigger_tpm(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 start_cmd)
> > static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> > {
> > struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > + size_t offset = 0;
> > + size_t chunk_size;
> > int rc = 0;
> >
> > /* Zero the cancel register so that the next command will not get
> > @@ -481,7 +453,7 @@ static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> > */
> > iowrite32(0, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_cancel);
> >
> > - if (len > priv->cmd_size) {
> > + if (len > priv->cmd_size && !priv->chunking_supported) {
> > dev_err(&chip->dev, "invalid command count value %zd %d\n",
> > len, priv->cmd_size);
> > return -E2BIG;
> > @@ -491,18 +463,108 @@ static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> > if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_PLUTON)
> > __crb_cmd_ready(&chip->dev, priv, chip->locality);
> >
> > - memcpy_toio(priv->cmd, buf, len);
> > + while (offset < len) {
> > + chunk_size = min_t(size_t, len - offset, priv->cmd_size);
> >
> > - /* Make sure that cmd is populated before issuing start. */
> > - wmb();
> > -
> > - rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_INVOKE);
> > - if (rc)
> > - return rc;
> > + if (chunk_size == 0)
> > + break;
> >
> > + memcpy_toio(priv->cmd, buf + offset, chunk_size);
> > + offset += chunk_size;
> > +
> > + /* Make sure that cmd is populated before issuing start. */
> > + wmb();
> > + if (offset < len) {
> > + rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + if (!crb_wait_for_reg_32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_start,
> > + CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK, 0, TPM2_TIMEOUT_C)) {
> > + dev_err(&chip->dev,
> > + "Timeout waiting for backend to consume chunk\n");
> > + return -ETIME;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_INVOKE);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > + }
> > return crb_try_pluton_doorbell(priv, false);
> > }
> >
> > +static int crb_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > + unsigned int expected;
> > + size_t offset = 0;
> > + size_t chunk_size;
> > + size_t first_read;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + /* A sanity check that the upper layer wants to get at least the header
> > + * as that is the minimum size for any TPM response.
> > + */
> > + if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + /* If this bit is set, according to the spec, the TPM is in
> > + * unrecoverable condition.
> > + */
> > + if (ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_sts) & CRB_CTRL_STS_ERROR)
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + /* Read the first 8 bytes in order to get the length of the response.
> > + * We read exactly a quad word in order to make sure that the remaining
> > + * reads will be aligned.
> > + */
> > + memcpy_fromio(buf, priv->rsp, 8);
> > +
> > + expected = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf[2]);
> > + if (expected > count || expected < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Set chunk_size by comparing the size of the buffer that the upper layer has
> > + * allocated (count) to the hardware tpm limit (priv->rsp_size).
> > + * This is to prevent buffer overflow while writing to buf.
> > + */
> > + chunk_size = min_t(size_t, count, priv->rsp_size);
> > + if (chunk_size < 8)
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Compare the actual size of the response we found in the header to the chunk_size.
> > + */
> > + first_read = min_t(size_t, expected, chunk_size);
> > +
> > + memcpy_fromio(&buf[8], &priv->rsp[8], first_read - 8);
> > + offset = first_read;
> > +
> > + while (offset < expected) {
> > + if (!priv->chunking_supported) {
> > + dev_err(&chip->dev, "Response larger than MMIO and chunking not supported\n");
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + if (!crb_wait_for_reg_32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_start,
> > + CRB_START_NEXT_CHUNK, 0, TPM2_TIMEOUT_C)) {
> > + dev_err(&chip->dev, "Timeout waiting for backend response\n");
> > + return -ETIME;
> > + }
> > +
> > + chunk_size = min_t(size_t, expected - offset, priv->rsp_size);
> > + memcpy_fromio(buf + offset, priv->rsp, chunk_size);
> > + offset += chunk_size;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return expected;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void crb_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > {
> > struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > @@ -727,6 +789,15 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + if (priv->regs_h) {
> > + u32 intf_id = ioread32((u32 __iomem *)&priv->regs_h->intf_id);
> > +
> > + if (intf_id & CRB_INTF_CAP_CRB_CHUNK) {
> > + priv->chunking_supported = true;
> > + dev_info(dev, "CRB Chunking is supported by backend\n");
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > memcpy_fromio(&__rsp_pa, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_rsp_pa, 8);
> > rsp_pa = le64_to_cpu(__rsp_pa);
> > rsp_size = ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_rsp_size);
> > @@ -764,8 +835,10 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > priv->rsp = priv->cmd;
> >
> > out:
> > - if (!ret)
> > + if (!ret) {
> > priv->cmd_size = cmd_size;
> > + priv->rsp_size = rsp_size;
> > + }
> >
> > __crb_go_idle(dev, priv, 0);
> >
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >
>
> BR, Jarkko
>
Regards,
Arun Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260324181244.17741-1-armenon@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-2-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:41 ` [RFC v2 1/5] tpm_crb: Add register definitions of TPM CRB chunking fields Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-3-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:43 ` [RFC v2 2/5] tpm_crb: Add new wrapper function to invoke start method Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-13 11:08 ` Arun Menon
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-4-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:53 ` [RFC v2 3/5] tpm_crb: Implement command and response chunking logic Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-13 11:07 ` Arun Menon [this message]
[not found] ` <20260324181244.17741-5-armenon@redhat.com>
2026-05-09 14:54 ` [RFC v2 4/5] tpm: Increase TPM_BUFSIZE to 8kB for chunking support Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-09 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-13 11:06 ` Arun Menon
2026-05-13 11:09 ` Arun Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agRbXSvz5YyyCX_o@fedora \
--to=armenon@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox