* [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: Insert newline for better readability
@ 2026-04-30 12:53 Nyunwoo Kim
2026-04-30 13:04 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nyunwoo Kim @ 2026-04-30 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Hocko, David Rientjes, Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Nyunwoo Kim
Insert a newline in check_panic_on_oom() for better readability.
Signed-off-by: Nyunwoo Kim <knw0507@naver.com>
---
This is my first patch and I am using it as practice to learn kernel
development. If this has wasted your time, I apologize; it was unintentional.
Thank you for your consideration.
mm/oom_kill.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 5c6c95c169ee..86a08deaa697 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -1076,6 +1076,7 @@ static void check_panic_on_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
{
if (likely(!sysctl_panic_on_oom))
return;
+
if (sysctl_panic_on_oom != 2) {
/*
* panic_on_oom == 1 only affects CONSTRAINT_NONE, the kernel
@@ -1085,9 +1086,11 @@ static void check_panic_on_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
if (oc->constraint != CONSTRAINT_NONE)
return;
}
+
/* Do not panic for oom kills triggered by sysrq */
if (is_sysrq_oom(oc))
return;
+
dump_header(oc);
panic("Out of memory: %s panic_on_oom is enabled\n",
sysctl_panic_on_oom == 2 ? "compulsory" : "system-wide");
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: Insert newline for better readability
2026-04-30 12:53 [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: Insert newline for better readability Nyunwoo Kim
@ 2026-04-30 13:04 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2026-04-30 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nyunwoo Kim
Cc: David Rientjes, Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Thu 30-04-26 21:53:21, Nyunwoo Kim wrote:
> Insert a newline in check_panic_on_oom() for better readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nyunwoo Kim <knw0507@naver.com>
> ---
> This is my first patch and I am using it as practice to learn kernel
> development. If this has wasted your time, I apologize; it was unintentional.
> Thank you for your consideration.
Patches like this are not adding any real value. While aiming for a
better readable code is a nobel goal I would recommend adding clean ups
like this one to other changes/patches that are improving the code
(either fixing existing bugs or making the overall code much better).
Thanks for trying and keep looking for something that might improve the
code.
>
> mm/oom_kill.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 5c6c95c169ee..86a08deaa697 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -1076,6 +1076,7 @@ static void check_panic_on_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
> {
> if (likely(!sysctl_panic_on_oom))
> return;
> +
> if (sysctl_panic_on_oom != 2) {
> /*
> * panic_on_oom == 1 only affects CONSTRAINT_NONE, the kernel
> @@ -1085,9 +1086,11 @@ static void check_panic_on_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
> if (oc->constraint != CONSTRAINT_NONE)
> return;
> }
> +
> /* Do not panic for oom kills triggered by sysrq */
> if (is_sysrq_oom(oc))
> return;
> +
> dump_header(oc);
> panic("Out of memory: %s panic_on_oom is enabled\n",
> sysctl_panic_on_oom == 2 ? "compulsory" : "system-wide");
> --
> 2.25.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-30 13:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-30 12:53 [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: Insert newline for better readability Nyunwoo Kim
2026-04-30 13:04 ` Michal Hocko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox