From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"Drew Fustini" <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/12] x86/resctrl: Add PMT registration API for AET enumeration callbacks
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:54:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alFcHbGmaDXygQpL@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b128216b-cc06-4e6e-b6b4-498a6e135d16@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 03:51:22PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 7/1/26 2:35 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> > resctrl is always built-in; INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY may be a module. Add, and
> > export, register/unregister functions so the PMT module can supply/clear
> > enumeration callback functions when loaded/unloaded.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> > index a9f481b7a8ed..48ad55bcda66 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
> > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL
> >
> > +#include <linux/intel_pmt_features.h>
> > +#include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
> > #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > #include <linux/percpu.h>
> > #include <linux/resctrl_types.h>
> > @@ -189,11 +191,31 @@ static inline void resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(struct rdt_resource *r,
> >
> > void resctrl_cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL_INTEL_AET
> > +void intel_aet_register_enumeration(struct module *module,
> > + struct pmt_feature_group *(*get)(enum pmt_feature_id id),
> > + void (*put)(struct pmt_feature_group *p));
> > +void intel_aet_unregister_enumeration(void);
> > #else
> > +static inline void intel_aet_register_enumeration(struct module *module,
> > + struct pmt_feature_group *(*get)(enum pmt_feature_id id),
> > + void (*put)(struct pmt_feature_group *p)) { }
> > +static inline void intel_aet_unregister_enumeration(void) { }
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL_INTEL_AET */
> > +
> > +#else
> > +
> > +#include <linux/intel_pmt_features.h>
> > +#include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
>
> Are we sure we want to include these in arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c and
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c when resctrl is not built in?
I'll look at this some more. Maybe this code needs some X86_64 checks?
> >
> > static inline void resctrl_arch_sched_in(struct task_struct *tsk) {}
> > static inline void resctrl_cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {}
> >
> > +static inline void intel_aet_register_enumeration(struct module *module,
> > + struct pmt_feature_group *(*get)(enum pmt_feature_id id),
> > + void (*put)(struct pmt_feature_group *p)) { }
> > +static inline void intel_aet_unregister_enumeration(void) { }
> > +
> > #endif /* CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL */
> >
> > #endif /* _ASM_X86_RESCTRL_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> > index cd8257c58f84..c26bd813e057 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> > @@ -12,17 +12,21 @@
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "resctrl: " fmt
> >
> > #include <linux/bits.h>
> > +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > #include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> > #include <linux/container_of.h>
> > #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/gfp_types.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/intel_pmt_features.h>
> > #include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/minmax.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/printk.h>
> > #include <linux/rculist.h>
> > #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> > @@ -291,6 +295,10 @@ static enum pmt_feature_id lookup_pfid(const char *pfname)
> > return FEATURE_INVALID;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct module *pmt_module;
> > +static struct pmt_feature_group *(*get_feature)(enum pmt_feature_id id);
> > +static void (*put_feature)(struct pmt_feature_group *p);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Request a copy of struct pmt_feature_group for each event group. If there is
> > * one, the returned structure has an array of telemetry_region structures,
> > @@ -325,6 +333,32 @@ bool intel_aet_get_events(void)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Defend against races between pmt_telemetry register/unregister and
> > + * resctrl file system mount/unmount.
> > + */
>
> Please help developers understand what this mutex protects. I am not able to deduce
> from above when this mutex needs to be taken.
>
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(aet_register_lock);
> > +
> > +void intel_aet_register_enumeration(struct module *module,
> > + struct pmt_feature_group *(*get)(enum pmt_feature_id id),
> > + void (*put)(struct pmt_feature_group *p))
> > +{
> > + guard(mutex)(&aet_register_lock);
> > + get_feature = get;
> > + put_feature = put;
> > + pmt_module = module;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_aet_register_enumeration, "INTEL_PMT");
> > +
> > +void intel_aet_unregister_enumeration(void)
> > +{
> > + guard(mutex)(&aet_register_lock);
> > + pmt_module = NULL;
> > + get_feature = NULL;
> > + put_feature = NULL;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_aet_unregister_enumeration, "INTEL_PMT");
> > +
> > void __exit intel_aet_exit(void)
> > {
> > struct event_group **peg;
>
> Reinette
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 21:35 [PATCH v9 00/12] Allow AET to use PMT as loadable module Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] platform/x86/intel/{pmt,vsec}: Prevent unbind via sysfs Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-09 17:41 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-09 20:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-09 21:12 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-10 17:01 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-10 20:24 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] fs/resctrl: Remove redundant calls to resctrl_arch_mon_capable() Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] x86/resctrl: Honor rdt=perf option to force enable AET perf events Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:29 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] fs/resctrl: Add interface to disable a monitor event Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] x86/resctrl: Drop global 'rdt_mon_capable' flag Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:31 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Handle change in number of RMIDs on each mount Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:51 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] x86/resctrl: Add PMT registration API for AET enumeration callbacks Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:54 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Register enumeration functions with resctrl Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] arm,x86/resctrl: Resolve INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY symbols at runtime Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:59 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] fs/resctrl: Call architecture hooks for every mount/unmount Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 21:01 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] x86/resctrl: Simplify Kconfig options for resctrl Tony Luck
2026-07-08 23:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 21:08 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] Documentation/filesystems/resctrl: Document telemetry mount timing caveat Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alFcHbGmaDXygQpL@agluck-desk3 \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox