From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"Drew Fustini" <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/12] arm,x86/resctrl: Resolve INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY symbols at runtime
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:59:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alFdKPQDc8ljlld0@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b83fb5c-302e-4306-946b-cd65351f794e@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 03:52:36PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 7/1/26 2:35 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> > resctrl is always built-in, but INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY and INTEL_TPMI are
> > logically independent and should be loadable modules. Switch AET to use the
> > function-pointer registration API instead of direct link-time references to
> > PMT symbols.
> >
> > Prepare for the file system to call resctrl_arch_pre_mount() on every mount
> > by moving AET enumeration into resctrl_arch_pre_mount() and cleanup into
> > resctrl_arch_unmount(). This allows the PMT module to be unloaded whenever
> > the filesystem is not mounted.
> >
> > Remove intel_aet_exit because all cleanup now happens in the unmount path.
>
> intel_aet_exit -> intel_aet_exit()
>
> At first glance this change does not seem symmetrical since it introduces
> the new enumeration and cleanup calls but does not call the cleanup call that
> appears as though it keeps a reference to the module. I think it will help to
> highlight that the previous exit code was not called anyway and at this point
> the module is still required to be built in so there is no actual reference taken.
Sure, will update.
> >
> > Note that the Linux file system code does not serialize calls to
> > fs_context_operations::get_tree(), so there may be arbitrarily many parallel
> > calls if users invoke mount(2) multiple times.
> >
> > Use "pmt_in_use" to detect nested mount attempts.
> >
> > event_group::num_rmid may be reset (reduced) during enumeration. This is
> > not worth resetting on unmount because the same reduction would occur on
> > each subsequent mount.
>
> If event_group::num_rmid gets a mention, should rdt_resource::resctrl_mon::num_rmid also?
Ok.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > --
> > v9:
> > Drop broken atomic ops introduced in v8
> > Check pmt_in_use in intel_aet_pre_mount() to detect nested
> > mount flow.
> > ---
> > include/linux/resctrl.h | 6 +++
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 23 ++++++++--
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 25 +++++++++--
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> > drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 4 ++
> > 5 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> > index e1501ee72d28..4dc41dc99dc2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> > @@ -564,6 +564,12 @@ void resctrl_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > */
> > void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Architecture hook called when mount fails, or on unmount.
> > + * No locks are held.
> > + */
> > +void resctrl_arch_unmount(void);
> > +
> > /**
> > * resctrl_arch_rmid_read() - Read the eventid counter corresponding to rmid
> > * for this resource and domain.
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> > index e3cfa0c10e92..a891017f69ec 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> > @@ -234,15 +234,15 @@ void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r);
> > void resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_set_one(struct rdt_resource *r);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL_INTEL_AET
> > -bool intel_aet_get_events(void);
> > -void __exit intel_aet_exit(void);
> > +bool intel_aet_pre_mount(void);
> > +void intel_aet_unmount(void);
> > int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, u32 rmid, void *arch_priv, u64 *val);
> > void intel_aet_mon_domain_setup(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resource *r,
> > struct list_head *add_pos);
> > bool intel_handle_aet_option(bool force_off, char *tok);
> > #else
> > -static inline bool intel_aet_get_events(void) { return false; }
> > -static inline void __exit intel_aet_exit(void) { }
> > +static inline bool intel_aet_pre_mount(void) { return false; }
> > +static inline void intel_aet_unmount(void) { }
> > static inline int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, u32 rmid, void *arch_priv, u64 *val)
> > {
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -253,4 +253,19 @@ static inline void intel_aet_mon_domain_setup(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resour
> > static inline bool intel_handle_aet_option(bool force_off, char *tok) { return false; }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY_MODULE
> > +static inline bool intel_aet_try_module_get(struct module *mod)
> > +{
> > + return try_module_get(mod);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void intel_aet_module_put(struct module *mod)
> > +{
> > + module_put(mod);
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool intel_aet_try_module_get(struct module *mod) { return true; }
> > +static inline void intel_aet_module_put(struct module *mod) { }
> > +#endif
>
>
> Trying to look back to how the above ended up like this I find:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/SJ1PR11MB60838C247727AE7CC324BB25FC1A2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
> that states:
> pmt_module is NULL if CONFIG_INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY=y ... i.e. built-in to the kernel.
>
> In that case it obviously can't go away, and doesn't need module_get()/module_put().
> There's no special case for this. try_module_get() takes a fault on NULL dereference.
> ...
>
> Taking a closer look at try_module_get() I do not see it attempting to dereference
> a NULL parameter but instead it returns true in this case which makes the above unnecessary?
> What am I missing?
I don't know. I definitely got a NULL dereference when I did a test with
the PMT code built-in. But it looks like I mis-diagnosed the issue. You
are right the try_module_get() and module_put() have special cases to
handle a NULL argument.
I will revisit.
> > +
> > #endif /* _ASM_X86_RESCTRL_INTERNAL_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> > index 3169441a2d40..3ef620d8e0c8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> > @@ -16,10 +16,12 @@
> >
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "resctrl: " fmt
> >
> > +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> > #include <asm/cpuid/api.h>
> > @@ -798,7 +800,7 @@ void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void)
> > struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG].r_resctrl;
> > int cpu;
> >
> > - if (!intel_aet_get_events())
> > + if (!intel_aet_pre_mount())
> > return;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -814,6 +816,25 @@ void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void)
> > cpus_read_unlock();
> > }
> >
> > +void resctrl_arch_unmount(void)
> > +{
> > + struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG].r_resctrl;
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + intel_aet_unmount();
> > +
> > + if (!r->mon_capable)
> > + return;
>
> Could the mon_capable check be moved before intel_aet_unmount()?
Yes. Will move.
> > +
> > + cpus_read_lock();
> > + mutex_lock(&domain_list_lock);
> > + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> > + domain_remove_cpu_mon(cpu, r);
> > + r->mon_capable = false;
> > + mutex_unlock(&domain_list_lock);
> > + cpus_read_unlock();
> > +}
> > +
> > enum {
> > RDT_FLAG_CMT,
> > RDT_FLAG_MBM_TOTAL,
> > @@ -1187,8 +1208,6 @@ late_initcall(resctrl_arch_late_init);
> >
> > static void __exit resctrl_arch_exit(void)
> > {
> > - intel_aet_exit();
> > -
> > cpuhp_remove_state(rdt_online);
> >
> > resctrl_exit();
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> > index c26bd813e057..c2e27ce52248 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> > @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
> > #include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/minmax.h>
> > -#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > #include <linux/printk.h>
> > #include <linux/rculist.h>
> > #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>
> This can be squashed with earlier patch.
OK. Will do.
> > @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void (*put_feature)(struct pmt_feature_group *p);
> > * struct pmt_feature_group to indicate that its events are successfully
> > * enabled.
> > */
> > -bool intel_aet_get_events(void)
> > +static bool aet_get_events(void)
> > {
> > struct pmt_feature_group *p;
> > enum pmt_feature_id pfid;
> > @@ -319,14 +319,14 @@ bool intel_aet_get_events(void)
> >
> > for_each_event_group(peg) {
> > pfid = lookup_pfid((*peg)->pfname);
> > - p = intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature(pfid);
> > + p = get_feature(pfid);
> > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
> > continue;
> > if (enable_events(*peg, p)) {
> > (*peg)->pfg = p;
> > ret = true;
> > } else {
> > - intel_pmt_put_feature_group(p);
> > + put_feature(p);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -359,16 +359,58 @@ void intel_aet_unregister_enumeration(void)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_aet_unregister_enumeration, "INTEL_PMT");
> >
> > -void __exit intel_aet_exit(void)
> > +/*
> > + * Track whether pmt_telemetry enumeration succeeded during mount to
> > + * detect nested mount attempts and for use during unmount.
> > + */
> > +static bool pmt_in_use;
> > +
> > +bool intel_aet_pre_mount(void)
> > +{
> > + bool ret;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&aet_register_lock);
> > +
> > + /* Nested mount attempt. File system code will return -EBUSY */
> > + if (pmt_in_use)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (!get_feature || !put_feature)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (!intel_aet_try_module_get(pmt_module))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + ret = aet_get_events();
> > +
> > + if (!ret)
> > + intel_aet_module_put(pmt_module);
> > + else
> > + pmt_in_use = true;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void intel_aet_unmount(void)
> > {
> > struct event_group **peg;
> >
> > + guard(mutex)(&aet_register_lock);
> > + if (!pmt_in_use)
> > + return;
> > +
> > for_each_event_group(peg) {
> > - if ((*peg)->pfg) {
> > - intel_pmt_put_feature_group((*peg)->pfg);
> > - (*peg)->pfg = NULL;
> > + struct event_group *e = *peg;
> > +
> > + if (e->pfg) {
> > + for (int j = 0; j < e->num_events; j++)
> > + resctrl_disable_mon_event(e->evts[j].id);
> > + put_feature(e->pfg);
> > + e->pfg = NULL;
> > }
> > }
> > + intel_aet_module_put(pmt_module);
> > + pmt_in_use = false;
> > }
> >
> > #define DATA_VALID BIT_ULL(63)
> > diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> > index 7079870ca894..5859cc0f5e37 100644
> > --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> > @@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +void resctrl_arch_unmount(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > bool resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid)
> > {
> > return mpam_resctrl_controls[rid].cdp_enabled;
>
> Reinette
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 21:35 [PATCH v9 00/12] Allow AET to use PMT as loadable module Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] platform/x86/intel/{pmt,vsec}: Prevent unbind via sysfs Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-09 17:41 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-09 20:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-09 21:12 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-10 17:01 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-10 20:24 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] fs/resctrl: Remove redundant calls to resctrl_arch_mon_capable() Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] x86/resctrl: Honor rdt=perf option to force enable AET perf events Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:29 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] fs/resctrl: Add interface to disable a monitor event Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] x86/resctrl: Drop global 'rdt_mon_capable' flag Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:31 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Handle change in number of RMIDs on each mount Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:51 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] x86/resctrl: Add PMT registration API for AET enumeration callbacks Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:54 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Register enumeration functions with resctrl Tony Luck
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] arm,x86/resctrl: Resolve INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY symbols at runtime Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 20:59 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] fs/resctrl: Call architecture hooks for every mount/unmount Tony Luck
2026-07-08 22:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 21:01 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] x86/resctrl: Simplify Kconfig options for resctrl Tony Luck
2026-07-08 23:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-10 21:08 ` Luck, Tony
2026-07-01 21:35 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] Documentation/filesystems/resctrl: Document telemetry mount timing caveat Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alFdKPQDc8ljlld0@agluck-desk3 \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox