The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
@ 2026-07-13  3:55 Yun Zhou
  2026-07-13  9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yun Zhou @ 2026-07-13  3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, linux-kernel, yun.zhou

When __xfs_trans_commit() fails in xfs_trans_roll(), the NOFS context
is cleared but only restored in the success path.  This leaves the
error path without nofs protection, causing a circular lock dependency
between xfs_nondir_ilock_class and fs_reclaim:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
  lock(fs_reclaim);

Fix this by moving xfs_trans_set_context() before the error check so
that nofs context is always restored on the new transaction.

Reported-by: syzbot+59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20
Fixes: a1ca658d649a ("xfs: fix incorrect context handling in xfs_trans_roll")
Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
 	 * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
 	 */
 	error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
+
+	tp = *tpp;
+	/*
+	 * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
+	 * xfs_trans_free.  Set it again here before doing memory
+	 * allocations.
+	 */
+	xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
+
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 
@@ -1040,13 +1049,6 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
 	 * either nothing be locked across this call, or that anything that is
 	 * locked be logged in the prior and the next transactions.
 	 */
-	tp = *tpp;
-	/*
-	 * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
-	 * xfs_trans_free.  Set it again here before doing memory
-	 * allocations.
-	 */
-	xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
 	error = xfs_log_regrant(tp->t_mountp, tp->t_ticket);
 	if (error)
 		return error;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
  2026-07-13  3:55 [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll Yun Zhou
@ 2026-07-13  9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2026-07-13 10:06   ` Zhou, Yun
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yun Zhou; +Cc: cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
> When __xfs_trans_commit() fails in xfs_trans_roll(), the NOFS context
> is cleared but only restored in the success path.  This leaves the
> error path without nofs protection, causing a circular lock dependency
> between xfs_nondir_ilock_class and fs_reclaim:
> 
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
>                                lock(fs_reclaim);
>                                lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
>   lock(fs_reclaim);
> 
> Fix this by moving xfs_trans_set_context() before the error check so
> that nofs context is always restored on the new transaction.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20
> Fixes: a1ca658d649a ("xfs: fix incorrect context handling in xfs_trans_roll")
> Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
>  	 * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
>  	 */
>  	error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
> +
> +	tp = *tpp;
> +	/*
> +	 * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
> +	 * xfs_trans_free.  Set it again here before doing memory
> +	 * allocations.
> +	 */
> +	xfs_trans_set_context(tp);

The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
__xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.

Otherwise yes, this call should move up.  I don't really see how
it fixes the syzbot report, though.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
  2026-07-13  9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-07-13 10:06   ` Zhou, Yun
  2026-07-13 13:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhou, Yun @ 2026-07-13 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel



On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
>>         * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
>>         */
>>        error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
>> +
>> +     tp = *tpp;
>> +     /*
>> +      * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
>> +      * xfs_trans_free.  Set it again here before doing memory
>> +      * allocations.
>> +      */
>> +     xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
> 
> The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
> __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.
> 
> Otherwise yes, this call should move up.  I don't really see how
> it fixes the syzbot report, though.
> 

Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only 
used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new 
transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the 
commit call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what 
the caller sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction 
regardless.

If I have overlooked any edge cases, please point them out.

BR,
Yun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
  2026-07-13 10:06   ` Zhou, Yun
@ 2026-07-13 13:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
  2026-07-13 23:04       ` Darrick J. Wong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhou, Yun; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:06:38PM +0800, Zhou, Yun wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
> > >         * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
> > >         */
> > >        error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
> > > +
> > > +     tp = *tpp;
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
> > > +      * xfs_trans_free.  Set it again here before doing memory
> > > +      * allocations.
> > > +      */
> > > +     xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
> > 
> > The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
> > __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.
> > 
> > Otherwise yes, this call should move up.  I don't really see how
> > it fixes the syzbot report, though.
> > 
> 
> Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only
> used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new
> transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit
> call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller
> sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless.

Ah, right.  Tis should be fine:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
  2026-07-13 13:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-07-13 23:04       ` Darrick J. Wong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2026-07-13 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Zhou, Yun, cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:28:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:06:38PM +0800, Zhou, Yun wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > > index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > > @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
> > > >         * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
> > > >         */
> > > >        error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
> > > > +
> > > > +     tp = *tpp;
> > > > +     /*
> > > > +      * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
> > > > +      * xfs_trans_free.  Set it again here before doing memory
> > > > +      * allocations.
> > > > +      */
> > > > +     xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
> > > 
> > > The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
> > > __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.
> > > 
> > > Otherwise yes, this call should move up.  I don't really see how
> > > it fixes the syzbot report, though.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only
> > used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new
> > transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit
> > call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller
> > sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless.
> 
> Ah, right.  Tis should be fine:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Why not move tp_pflags to the new transaction in xfs_trans_dup like we
do for the deferred item list:

	/* move deferred ops over to the new tp */
	xfs_defer_move(ntp, tp);

	ntp->t_pflags = tp->t_pflags;
	tp->t_pflags = 0;

--D

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-13 23:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-13  3:55 [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll Yun Zhou
2026-07-13  9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-13 10:06   ` Zhou, Yun
2026-07-13 13:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-13 23:04       ` Darrick J. Wong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox