* [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
@ 2026-07-13 3:55 Yun Zhou
2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yun Zhou @ 2026-07-13 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, linux-kernel, yun.zhou
When __xfs_trans_commit() fails in xfs_trans_roll(), the NOFS context
is cleared but only restored in the success path. This leaves the
error path without nofs protection, causing a circular lock dependency
between xfs_nondir_ilock_class and fs_reclaim:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
lock(fs_reclaim);
Fix this by moving xfs_trans_set_context() before the error check so
that nofs context is always restored on the new transaction.
Reported-by: syzbot+59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20
Fixes: a1ca658d649a ("xfs: fix incorrect context handling in xfs_trans_roll")
Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
* duplicate transaction that gets returned.
*/
error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
+
+ tp = *tpp;
+ /*
+ * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
+ * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
+ * allocations.
+ */
+ xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
+
if (error)
return error;
@@ -1040,13 +1049,6 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
* either nothing be locked across this call, or that anything that is
* locked be logged in the prior and the next transactions.
*/
- tp = *tpp;
- /*
- * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
- * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
- * allocations.
- */
- xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
error = xfs_log_regrant(tp->t_mountp, tp->t_ticket);
if (error)
return error;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
2026-07-13 3:55 [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll Yun Zhou
@ 2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yun Zhou; +Cc: cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
> When __xfs_trans_commit() fails in xfs_trans_roll(), the NOFS context
> is cleared but only restored in the success path. This leaves the
> error path without nofs protection, causing a circular lock dependency
> between xfs_nondir_ilock_class and fs_reclaim:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
> lock(fs_reclaim);
> lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
> lock(fs_reclaim);
>
> Fix this by moving xfs_trans_set_context() before the error check so
> that nofs context is always restored on the new transaction.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20
> Fixes: a1ca658d649a ("xfs: fix incorrect context handling in xfs_trans_roll")
> Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
> * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
> */
> error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
> +
> + tp = *tpp;
> + /*
> + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
> + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
> + * allocations.
> + */
> + xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
__xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.
Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how
it fixes the syzbot report, though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun
2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhou, Yun @ 2026-07-13 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel
On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
>> * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
>> */
>> error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
>> +
>> + tp = *tpp;
>> + /*
>> + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
>> + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
>> + * allocations.
>> + */
>> + xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
>
> The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
> __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.
>
> Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how
> it fixes the syzbot report, though.
>
Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only
used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new
transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the
commit call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what
the caller sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction
regardless.
If I have overlooked any edge cases, please point them out.
BR,
Yun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun
@ 2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-13 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhou, Yun; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:06:38PM +0800, Zhou, Yun wrote:
>
>
> On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
> > > * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
> > > */
> > > error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
> > > +
> > > + tp = *tpp;
> > > + /*
> > > + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
> > > + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
> > > + * allocations.
> > > + */
> > > + xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
> >
> > The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
> > __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.
> >
> > Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how
> > it fixes the syzbot report, though.
> >
>
> Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only
> used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new
> transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit
> call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller
> sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless.
Ah, right. Tis should be fine:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-07-13 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2026-07-13 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Zhou, Yun, cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:28:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:06:38PM +0800, Zhou, Yun wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > > index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > > > @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
> > > > * duplicate transaction that gets returned.
> > > > */
> > > > error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
> > > > +
> > > > + tp = *tpp;
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
> > > > + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
> > > > + * allocations.
> > > > + */
> > > > + xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
> > >
> > > The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when
> > > __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this.
> > >
> > > Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how
> > > it fixes the syzbot report, though.
> > >
> >
> > Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only
> > used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new
> > transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit
> > call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller
> > sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless.
>
> Ah, right. Tis should be fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Why not move tp_pflags to the new transaction in xfs_trans_dup like we
do for the deferred item list:
/* move deferred ops over to the new tp */
xfs_defer_move(ntp, tp);
ntp->t_pflags = tp->t_pflags;
tp->t_pflags = 0;
--D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-13 23:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-13 3:55 [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll Yun Zhou
2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun
2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-13 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox