* [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
@ 2026-07-13 3:55 Yun Zhou
2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yun Zhou @ 2026-07-13 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, linux-kernel, yun.zhou
When __xfs_trans_commit() fails in xfs_trans_roll(), the NOFS context
is cleared but only restored in the success path. This leaves the
error path without nofs protection, causing a circular lock dependency
between xfs_nondir_ilock_class and fs_reclaim:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
lock(fs_reclaim);
Fix this by moving xfs_trans_set_context() before the error check so
that nofs context is always restored on the new transaction.
Reported-by: syzbot+59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20
Fixes: a1ca658d649a ("xfs: fix incorrect context handling in xfs_trans_roll")
Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
* duplicate transaction that gets returned.
*/
error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true);
+
+ tp = *tpp;
+ /*
+ * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
+ * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
+ * allocations.
+ */
+ xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
+
if (error)
return error;
@@ -1040,13 +1049,6 @@ xfs_trans_roll(
* either nothing be locked across this call, or that anything that is
* locked be logged in the prior and the next transactions.
*/
- tp = *tpp;
- /*
- * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into
- * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory
- * allocations.
- */
- xfs_trans_set_context(tp);
error = xfs_log_regrant(tp->t_mountp, tp->t_ticket);
if (error)
return error;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll 2026-07-13 3:55 [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll Yun Zhou @ 2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig 2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yun Zhou; +Cc: cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote: > When __xfs_trans_commit() fails in xfs_trans_roll(), the NOFS context > is cleared but only restored in the success path. This leaves the > error path without nofs protection, causing a circular lock dependency > between xfs_nondir_ilock_class and fs_reclaim: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); > lock(fs_reclaim); > lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); > lock(fs_reclaim); > > Fix this by moving xfs_trans_set_context() before the error check so > that nofs context is always restored on the new transaction. > > Reported-by: syzbot+59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59178abfeb0ea3f0ab20 > Fixes: a1ca658d649a ("xfs: fix incorrect context handling in xfs_trans_roll") > Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@windriver.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 16 +++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll( > * duplicate transaction that gets returned. > */ > error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true); > + > + tp = *tpp; > + /* > + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into > + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory > + * allocations. > + */ > + xfs_trans_set_context(tp); The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this. Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how it fixes the syzbot report, though. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll 2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun 2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Zhou, Yun @ 2026-07-13 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote: >> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c >> index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644 >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c >> @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll( >> * duplicate transaction that gets returned. >> */ >> error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true); >> + >> + tp = *tpp; >> + /* >> + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into >> + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory >> + * allocations. >> + */ >> + xfs_trans_set_context(tp); > > The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when > __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this. > > Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how > it fixes the syzbot report, though. > Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless. If I have overlooked any edge cases, please point them out. BR, Yun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll 2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun @ 2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig 2026-07-13 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhou, Yun; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:06:38PM +0800, Zhou, Yun wrote: > > > On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > > > index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644 > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > > > @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll( > > > * duplicate transaction that gets returned. > > > */ > > > error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true); > > > + > > > + tp = *tpp; > > > + /* > > > + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into > > > + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory > > > + * allocations. > > > + */ > > > + xfs_trans_set_context(tp); > > > > The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when > > __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this. > > > > Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how > > it fixes the syzbot report, though. > > > > Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only > used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new > transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit > call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller > sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless. Ah, right. Tis should be fine: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll 2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-13 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong 2026-07-14 2:15 ` Zhou, Yun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2026-07-13 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Zhou, Yun, cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:28:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:06:38PM +0800, Zhou, Yun wrote: > > > > > > On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote: > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > > > > index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c > > > > @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll( > > > > * duplicate transaction that gets returned. > > > > */ > > > > error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true); > > > > + > > > > + tp = *tpp; > > > > + /* > > > > + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into > > > > + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory > > > > + * allocations. > > > > + */ > > > > + xfs_trans_set_context(tp); > > > > > > The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when > > > __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this. > > > > > > Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how > > > it fixes the syzbot report, though. > > > > > > > Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only > > used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new > > transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit > > call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller > > sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless. > > Ah, right. Tis should be fine: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Why not move tp_pflags to the new transaction in xfs_trans_dup like we do for the deferred item list: /* move deferred ops over to the new tp */ xfs_defer_move(ntp, tp); ntp->t_pflags = tp->t_pflags; tp->t_pflags = 0; --D ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll 2026-07-13 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong @ 2026-07-14 2:15 ` Zhou, Yun 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Zhou, Yun @ 2026-07-14 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darrick J. Wong, Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: cem, linux-xfs, linux-kernel On 7/14/26 07:04, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:28:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:06:38PM +0800, Zhou, Yun wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 7/13/26 17:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote: >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c >>>>> index 7bfbd9f6f0df..1b36cf12d4e3 100644 >>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c >>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c >>>>> @@ -1029,6 +1029,15 @@ xfs_trans_roll( >>>>> * duplicate transaction that gets returned. >>>>> */ >>>>> error = __xfs_trans_commit(tp, true); >>>>> + >>>>> + tp = *tpp; >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * __xfs_trans_commit cleared the NOFS flag by calling into >>>>> + * xfs_trans_free. Set it again here before doing memory >>>>> + * allocations. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + xfs_trans_set_context(tp); >>>> >>>> The tp assignment above now returns the incorrect transaction when >>>> __xfs_trans_commit fails, so you can't do this. >>>> >>>> Otherwise yes, this call should move up. I don't really see how >>>> it fixes the syzbot report, though. >>>> >>> >>> Thank you very much for your reply. The tp here is a local variable only >>> used for convenience within the function. The caller always gets the new >>> transaction through *tpp, which was set by xfs_trans_dup() before the commit >>> call. Moving tp = *tpp before the error check doesn't change what the caller >>> sees - *tpp still points to the new (dup'd) transaction regardless. >> >> Ah, right. Tis should be fine: >> >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > Why not move tp_pflags to the new transaction in xfs_trans_dup like we > do for the deferred item list: > > /* move deferred ops over to the new tp */ > xfs_defer_move(ntp, tp); > > ntp->t_pflags = tp->t_pflags; > tp->t_pflags = 0; > That's what the old xfs_trans_switch_context() did before a1ca658d649a removed it. The problem is that setting tp->t_pflags = 0 means xfs_trans_free() calls memalloc_nofs_restore(0), which relies on that being a no-op — an mm implementation detail. A fresh memalloc_nofs_save() on the new tp keeps the save/restore pairing correct unconditionally. BR, Yun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-14 2:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-07-13 3:55 [PATCH] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll Yun Zhou 2026-07-13 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig 2026-07-13 10:06 ` Zhou, Yun 2026-07-13 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig 2026-07-13 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong 2026-07-14 2:15 ` Zhou, Yun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox