From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
babu.moger@amd.com, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] fs/resctrl: Disallow the software controller when MBM counters are assignable
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 10:34:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5937cd1-03e9-4739-9f35-c908f3b19eb8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e53cafe4-d3c3-4707-b9b2-9823cd7b34ee@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 5/4/26 17:01, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 4/28/26 6:04 AM, Ben Horgan wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index b382a348dd79..be84bb210e3a 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -2530,7 +2530,8 @@ static bool supports_mba_mbps(void)
>>
>> return (resctrl_is_mbm_enabled() &&
>> r->alloc_capable && is_mba_linear() &&
>> - r->ctrl_scope == rmbm->mon_scope);
>> + r->ctrl_scope == rmbm->mon_scope &&
>> + !rmbm->mon.mbm_cntr_assignable);
>> }
>
> For better or worse supports_mba_mbps() has a function description that documents
> the above tests. Updating the tests but not the accompanying description creates
> an inconsistency. How about something like below?
>
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 36d21652616e..b456a67b2c24 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -2536,10 +2536,12 @@ static void mba_sc_domain_destroy(struct rdt_resource *r,
> }
>
> /*
> - * MBA software controller is supported only if
> - * MBM is supported and MBA is in linear scale,
> - * and the MBM monitor scope is the same as MBA
> - * control scope.
> + * MBA software controller is supported only if MBM is supported and MBA is in
> + * linear scale, and the MBM monitor scope is the same as MBA control scope.
> + *
> + * Software controller cannot be supported when the MBM counters are assignable.
> + * There is no guarantee that MBM counters are assigned to the event backing
> + * the software controller in all monitoring domains of all monitoring groups.
Yes, that makes sense to me. I'll use that.
Thanks,
Ben
> */
> static bool supports_mba_mbps(void)
> {
>
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2945,7 +2946,7 @@ static int rdt_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
>> ctx->enable_cdpl2 = true;
>> return 0;
>> case Opt_mba_mbps:
>> - msg = "mba_MBps requires MBM and linear scale MBA at L3 scope";
>> + msg = "mba_MBps requires MBM (mbm_event mode not supported) and linear scale MBA at L3 scope";
>> if (!supports_mba_mbps())
>> return invalfc(fc, msg);
>> ctx->enable_mba_mbps = true;
>
> Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 13:04 [PATCH v5 0/7] x86,fs/resctrl: Pave the way for MPAM counter assignment Ben Horgan
2026-04-28 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] fs/resctrl: Tidy up the error path in resctrl_mkdir_event_configs() Ben Horgan
2026-05-04 15:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-04-28 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] x86,fs/resctrl: Create 'event_filter' files read only if they're not configurable Ben Horgan
2026-05-04 15:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-04-28 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] fs/resctrl: Disallow the software controller when MBM counters are assignable Ben Horgan
2026-05-04 16:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-05-05 9:34 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2026-05-05 10:20 ` Ben Horgan
2026-05-05 15:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-05-05 15:51 ` Ben Horgan
2026-04-28 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] fs/resctrl: Add monitor property 'mbm_cntr_assign_fixed' Ben Horgan
2026-05-04 16:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-04-28 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] fs/resctrl: Continue counter allocation after failure Ben Horgan
2026-05-04 16:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-04-28 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] fs/resctrl: Document that automatic counter assignment is best effort Ben Horgan
2026-05-04 16:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-04-28 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] fs/resctrl: Document tasks file behaviour for task id 0 and idle tasks Ben Horgan
2026-05-04 16:02 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5937cd1-03e9-4739-9f35-c908f3b19eb8@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox