The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Log error code on trampoline unlink failure
@ 2026-07-26 15:07 xu.xin16
  2026-07-26 15:50 ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: xu.xin16 @ 2026-07-26 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau,
	song, yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, bpf, linux-kernel, leon.hwang

From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>

Replace silent WARN_ON_ONCE with WARN_ONCE that prints the actual error
code from bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(). This aids debugging of race
conditions during link teardown, while keeping the warning rate limited
to avoid log flooding.

This will be very helpful for speeding up trouble-shooting of some crash
UAF due to bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog failures.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
---
v1->v2:
1) clean the subject name by remove 'syscall' suggested by Leon Hwang
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20a444b2-aeed-4af8-ba76-e994e2c14087@linux.dev/
2) Add up the missed case in kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:bpf_shim_tramp_link_release()

kernel/bpf/syscall.c    | 9 ++++++---
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 6db306d23b47..2348dc33abf4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3626,10 +3626,13 @@ static void bpf_tracing_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
 	struct bpf_tracing_link *tr_link =
 		container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_link, link.link);
+	int err;

-	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&tr_link->link.node,
-						tr_link->trampoline,
-						tr_link->tgt_prog));
+	err = bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&tr_link->link.node,
+					tr_link->trampoline,
+					tr_link->tgt_prog);
+	if (err)
+		WARN_ONCE(err, "bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog returns error: %d\n", err);

 	bpf_trampoline_put(tr_link->trampoline);

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 1a721fc4bef5..dae3c2104ed4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -997,12 +997,15 @@ static void bpf_shim_tramp_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
 	struct bpf_shim_tramp_link *shim_link =
 		container_of(link, struct bpf_shim_tramp_link, link.link);
+	int err;

 	/* paired with 'shim_link->trampoline = tr' in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim */
 	if (!shim_link->trampoline)
 		return;

-	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link.node, shim_link->trampoline, NULL));
+	err = bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link.node, shim_link->trampoline, NULL);
+	if (err)
+		WARN_ONCE(err, "bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog returns error: %d\n", err);
 	bpf_trampoline_put(shim_link->trampoline);
 }

-- 
2.25.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Log error code on trampoline unlink failure
  2026-07-26 15:07 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Log error code on trampoline unlink failure xu.xin16
@ 2026-07-26 15:50 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-07-27  2:31   ` xu.xin16
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-07-26 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xu.xin16, ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, eddyz87, memxor,
	martin.lau, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, bpf, linux-kernel,
	leon.hwang

On 2026/7/26 23:07, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Replace silent WARN_ON_ONCE with WARN_ONCE that prints the actual error
> code from bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(). This aids debugging of race
> conditions during link teardown, while keeping the warning rate limited
> to avoid log flooding.
> 
> This will be very helpful for speeding up trouble-shooting of some crash
> UAF due to bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog failures.
> 
> No functional change intended.

Is it "No change to unlink behavior"?

> 
> Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> 1) clean the subject name by remove 'syscall' suggested by Leon Hwang
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20a444b2-aeed-4af8-ba76-e994e2c14087@linux.dev/
> 2) Add up the missed case in kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:bpf_shim_tramp_link_release()
> 
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c    | 9 ++++++---
>  kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 6db306d23b47..2348dc33abf4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -3626,10 +3626,13 @@ static void bpf_tracing_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_tracing_link *tr_link =
>  		container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_link, link.link);
> +	int err;
> 
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&tr_link->link.node,
> -						tr_link->trampoline,
> -						tr_link->tgt_prog));
> +	err = bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&tr_link->link.node,
> +					tr_link->trampoline,
> +					tr_link->tgt_prog);
> +	if (err)
> +		WARN_ONCE(err, "bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog returns error: %d\n", err);

'if (err)' here is unnecessary.

> 
>  	bpf_trampoline_put(tr_link->trampoline);
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> index 1a721fc4bef5..dae3c2104ed4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> @@ -997,12 +997,15 @@ static void bpf_shim_tramp_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_shim_tramp_link *shim_link =
>  		container_of(link, struct bpf_shim_tramp_link, link.link);
> +	int err;
> 
>  	/* paired with 'shim_link->trampoline = tr' in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim */
>  	if (!shim_link->trampoline)
>  		return;
> 
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link.node, shim_link->trampoline, NULL));
> +	err = bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link.node, shim_link->trampoline, NULL);
> +	if (err)
> +		WARN_ONCE(err, "bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog returns error: %d\n", err);

Ditto.

>  	bpf_trampoline_put(shim_link->trampoline);
>  }
> 

Would it be better to include this multi_detach() one?

		WARN_ON_ONCE(__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&mnode->node, mnode->trampoline,
					NULL, &trampoline_multi_ops, data));

Thanks,
Leon


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Log error code on trampoline unlink failure
  2026-07-26 15:50 ` Leon Hwang
@ 2026-07-27  2:31   ` xu.xin16
  2026-07-27  5:27     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: xu.xin16 @ 2026-07-27  2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: leon.hwang
  Cc: ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau,
	song, yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, bpf, linux-kernel, leon.hwang

> > Replace silent WARN_ON_ONCE with WARN_ONCE that prints the actual error
> > code from bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(). This aids debugging of race
> > conditions during link teardown, while keeping the warning rate limited
> > to avoid log flooding.
> > 
> > This will be very helpful for speeding up trouble-shooting of some crash
> > UAF due to bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog failures.
> > 
> > No functional change intended.
> 
> Is it "No change to unlink behavior"?

Yes.

> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
> > ---
> > v1->v2:
> > 1) clean the subject name by remove 'syscall' suggested by Leon Hwang
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20a444b2-aeed-4af8-ba76-e994e2c14087@linux.dev/
> > 2) Add up the missed case in kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:bpf_shim_tramp_link_release()
> > 
> > kernel/bpf/syscall.c    | 9 ++++++---
> >  kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 5 ++++-
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > index 6db306d23b47..2348dc33abf4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > @@ -3626,10 +3626,13 @@ static void bpf_tracing_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
> >  {
> >      struct bpf_tracing_link *tr_link =
> >          container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_link, link.link);
> > +    int err;
> > 
> > -    WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&tr_link->link.node,
> > -                        tr_link->trampoline,
> > -                        tr_link->tgt_prog));
> > +    err = bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&tr_link->link.node,
> > +                    tr_link->trampoline,
> > +                    tr_link->tgt_prog);
> > +    if (err)
> > +        WARN_ONCE(err, "bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog returns error: %d\n", err);
> 
> 'if (err)' here is unnecessary.
> 
> > 
> >      bpf_trampoline_put(tr_link->trampoline);
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> > index 1a721fc4bef5..dae3c2104ed4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> > @@ -997,12 +997,15 @@ static void bpf_shim_tramp_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
> >  {
> >      struct bpf_shim_tramp_link *shim_link =
> >          container_of(link, struct bpf_shim_tramp_link, link.link);
> > +    int err;
> > 
> >      /* paired with 'shim_link->trampoline = tr' in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim */
> >      if (!shim_link->trampoline)
> >          return;
> > 
> > -    WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link.node, shim_link->trampoline, NULL));
> > +    err = bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->link.node, shim_link->trampoline, NULL);
> > +    if (err)
> > +        WARN_ONCE(err, "bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog returns error: %d\n", err);
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> >      bpf_trampoline_put(shim_link->trampoline);
> >  }
> > 
> 
> Would it be better to include this multi_detach() one?
> 
>         WARN_ON_ONCE(__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&mnode->node, mnode->trampoline,
>                     NULL, &trampoline_multi_ops, data));
> 

Sure, what about moving WARNing into __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog and then the failures of
__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog everywhere will be logged.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Log error code on trampoline unlink failure
  2026-07-27  2:31   ` xu.xin16
@ 2026-07-27  5:27     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-07-27  5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xu.xin16
  Cc: ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau,
	song, yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, bpf, linux-kernel

On 27/7/26 10:31, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>
>> Would it be better to include this multi_detach() one?
>>
>>         WARN_ON_ONCE(__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&mnode->node, mnode->trampoline,
>>                     NULL, &trampoline_multi_ops, data));
>>
> 
> Sure, what about moving WARNing into __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog and then the failures of
> __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog everywhere will be logged.

No. I think it's callers' responsibility to log warning.

Thanks,
Leon


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-27  5:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-26 15:07 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Log error code on trampoline unlink failure xu.xin16
2026-07-26 15:50 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-27  2:31   ` xu.xin16
2026-07-27  5:27     ` Leon Hwang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox