The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] netdevsim: psp: reset spi on key rotation and check for exhaustion on alloc
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 12:53:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.22d046e36117d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508-nsim-psp-crypto-v1-1-4b50ed09b794@gmail.com>

Daniel Zahka wrote:
> The PSP spec states that the lower 31b of the SPI need to be
> non-zero. Though not in the spec, I think it is reasonable to reset
> the lower 31b of the spi space after a key rotation, and to also
> decline to generate session keys when the lower 31b saturate.

Since this is already a 6 patch series, these two independent changes
could be separate patches.

Agreed on both points btw.
 
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> index 6936ecb8173e..5073bda60883 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
> @@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ nsim_rx_spi_alloc(struct psp_dev *psd, u32 version,
>  		  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
>  	struct netdevsim *ns = psd->drv_priv;
> -	unsigned int new;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	new = ++ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_ID;
> -	if (psd->generation & 1)
> -		new |= PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE;
> +	if ((ns->psp.spi ^ (ns->psp.spi + 1)) & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "SPI space exhausted");
> +		return -ENOSPC;
> +	}

Can this all be more readable without the use of XORs? This is not hot
path code that needs to be optimized.

        if (ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_ID == INT32_MAX) {
                NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "SPI space exhausted");
                return -ENOSPC;
        }
  
> -	assoc->spi = cpu_to_be32(new);
> +	assoc->spi = cpu_to_be32(++ns->psp.spi);
>  	assoc->key[0] = psd->generation;
>  	for (i = 1; i < PSP_MAX_KEY; i++)
>  		assoc->key[i] = ns->psp.spi + i;
> @@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ static int nsim_assoc_add(struct psp_dev *psd, struct psp_assoc *pas,
>  
>  static int nsim_key_rotate(struct psp_dev *psd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
> +	struct netdevsim *ns = psd->drv_priv;
> +
> +	ns->psp.spi = (ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE) ^ PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE;
> +

        /* Flip key phase and reset SPI to 0 within that space
         * (will be pre-incremented, as 0 is an invalid SPI)
         */
        if (ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE)
                ns->psp.spi = 0;
        else
                ns->psp.spi = PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE;

Even while making the code more self evident I still feel it needs a
comment to explain all that is going on.

Maybe it can be more self-evident.

Or maybe you find the XOR just as readable already.

Your call. A comment might be helpful either way.


>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08 14:53 [PATCH net-next 0/6] netdevsim: psp: implement real crypto operations from the PSP spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] netdevsim: psp: reset spi on key rotation and check for exhaustion on alloc Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 16:53   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] netdevsim: psp: remove unnecessary UDP checksum computation Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 17:01   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 17:46     ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:01       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 19:43         ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] netdevsim: psp: move rx processing into nsim_poll() Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:03   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] netdevsim: psp: implement kdf from psp spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:49   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] netdevsim: psp: add real aes-gcm encryption and decryption Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:10   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] netdevsim: psp: count rx authentication and length errors Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:19   ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.22d046e36117d@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox