From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] netdevsim: psp: implement kdf from psp spec
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 15:49:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.36d2fcc3d2e74@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508-nsim-psp-crypto-v1-4-4b50ed09b794@gmail.com>
Daniel Zahka wrote:
> Implement the PSP key derivation function (KDF) per the PSP
> Architecture Spec.
>
> The kdf is used to generate spi + session key pairs, and will also be
Text is a bit ambiguous here: the kdf does not generate the spi. It
derives a session key from the master key and spi.
> used in the rx path to re-derive the tx key used by the peer.
>
> Also, remove support for psd->generation, as it is not needed for
> netdevsim after removing the fake authentication hack.
Is psd->generation only used inside driver code, not by the core PSP
stack? Else it should be set to !!(ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE) on
key rotation. If only used by the driver, no need to reset it on each
rotation.
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
> enum skb_drop_reason
> nsim_psp_handle_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netdevsim *ns)
> {
> @@ -155,7 +189,7 @@ nsim_rx_spi_alloc(struct psp_dev *psd, u32 version,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct netdevsim *ns = psd->drv_priv;
> - int i;
> + unsigned int phase;
>
> if ((ns->psp.spi ^ (ns->psp.spi + 1)) & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "SPI space exhausted");
> @@ -163,9 +197,11 @@ nsim_rx_spi_alloc(struct psp_dev *psd, u32 version,
> }
>
> assoc->spi = cpu_to_be32(++ns->psp.spi);
> - assoc->key[0] = psd->generation;
> - for (i = 1; i < PSP_MAX_KEY; i++)
> - assoc->key[i] = ns->psp.spi + i;
> + phase = !!(ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE);
> +
> + /* dev_keys_lock not needed because of psd->lock */
Can you elaborate a bit?
Is dev_keys_lock only used to synchronize the writers, then? Which after
device init would only be concurrent invocations of nsim_key_rotate. But
that operation correctly also holds the device lock using
psp_device_get_locked.
> + nsim_psp_derive_key(ns->psp.dev_keys[phase], assoc->spi, version,
> + assoc->key);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -186,8 +222,15 @@ static int nsim_assoc_add(struct psp_dev *psd, struct psp_assoc *pas,
> static int nsim_key_rotate(struct psp_dev *psd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct netdevsim *ns = psd->drv_priv;
> + unsigned int next_phase;
>
> + psd->generation = 0;
> ns->psp.spi = (ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE) ^ PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE;
> + next_phase = !!(ns->psp.spi & PSP_SPI_KEY_PHASE);
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&ns->psp.dev_keys_lock);
> + get_random_bytes(ns->psp.dev_keys[next_phase], NSIM_PSP_DEV_KEY_SIZE);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ns->psp.dev_keys_lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -295,6 +338,10 @@ int nsim_psp_init(struct netdevsim *ns)
> struct dentry *ddir = ns->nsim_dev_port->ddir;
> struct psp_dev *psd;
>
> + spin_lock_init(&ns->psp.dev_keys_lock);
> + get_random_bytes(ns->psp.dev_keys[0], NSIM_PSP_DEV_KEY_SIZE);
> + get_random_bytes(ns->psp.dev_keys[1], NSIM_PSP_DEV_KEY_SIZE);
> +
> psd = psp_dev_create(ns->netdev, &nsim_psp_ops, &nsim_psp_caps, ns);
> if (IS_ERR(psd))
> return PTR_ERR(psd);
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 14:53 [PATCH net-next 0/6] netdevsim: psp: implement real crypto operations from the PSP spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] netdevsim: psp: reset spi on key rotation and check for exhaustion on alloc Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 16:53 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] netdevsim: psp: remove unnecessary UDP checksum computation Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 17:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 17:46 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-11 19:43 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] netdevsim: psp: move rx processing into nsim_poll() Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] netdevsim: psp: implement kdf from psp spec Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 19:49 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] netdevsim: psp: add real aes-gcm encryption and decryption Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] netdevsim: psp: count rx authentication and length errors Daniel Zahka
2026-05-11 20:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.36d2fcc3d2e74@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox