* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Add a bpf_getxattr kfunc
[not found] <20220621012811.2683313-5-kpsingh@kernel.org>
@ 2022-06-21 3:20 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-21 7:18 ` KP Singh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-21 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KP Singh, bpf
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, KP Singh, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Andrii Nakryiko, Benjamin Tissoires, Yosry Ahmed
Hi KP,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/KP-Singh/Add-bpf_getxattr/20220621-093013
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: x86_64-randconfig-a015-20220620 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220621/202206211035.p3LxbVfK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project af6d2a0b6825e71965f3e2701a63c239fa0ad70f)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/dd49d2ffb18adceafa98bd517008f59aa9bc910b
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review KP-Singh/Add-bpf_getxattr/20220621-093013
git checkout dd49d2ffb18adceafa98bd517008f59aa9bc910b
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/trace/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1185:25: warning: no previous prototype for function 'bpf_getxattr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
^
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1185:17: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
^
static
1 warning generated.
vim +/bpf_getxattr +1185 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
1184
> 1185 noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
1186 const char *name, void *value, int size)
1187 {
1188 return __vfs_getxattr(dentry, inode, name, value, size);
1189 }
1190
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Add a bpf_getxattr kfunc
2022-06-21 3:20 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Add a bpf_getxattr kfunc kernel test robot
@ 2022-06-21 7:18 ` KP Singh
2022-06-21 12:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: KP Singh @ 2022-06-21 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: bpf, llvm, kbuild-all, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Andrii Nakryiko, Benjamin Tissoires, Yosry Ahmed
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:20 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi KP,
>
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/KP-Singh/Add-bpf_getxattr/20220621-093013
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> config: x86_64-randconfig-a015-20220620 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220621/202206211035.p3LxbVfK-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project af6d2a0b6825e71965f3e2701a63c239fa0ad70f)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/dd49d2ffb18adceafa98bd517008f59aa9bc910b
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review KP-Singh/Add-bpf_getxattr/20220621-093013
> git checkout dd49d2ffb18adceafa98bd517008f59aa9bc910b
> # save the config file
> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/trace/
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1185:25: warning: no previous prototype for function 'bpf_getxattr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> ^
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1185:17: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> ^
> static
> 1 warning generated.
>
So it looks like this needs a function prototype. Let's do an initial round
of reviews on this series and I can respin with something like:
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
index 9acbc11ac7bb..3f62e5d35037 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(bpf_trace_printk,
TP_printk("%s", __get_str(bpf_string))
);
+/* Prototypes for kernel functions exposed to tracing and LSM
+ * programs
+ */
+ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
+ const char *name, void *value, int size);
#endif /* _TRACE_BPF_TRACE_H */
(or anything else folks suggest)
- KP
>
> vim +/bpf_getxattr +1185 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>
> 1184
> > 1185 noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> 1186 const char *name, void *value, int size)
> 1187 {
> 1188 return __vfs_getxattr(dentry, inode, name, value, size);
> 1189 }
> 1190
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Add a bpf_getxattr kfunc
2022-06-21 7:18 ` KP Singh
@ 2022-06-21 12:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-06-21 16:06 ` KP Singh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-06-21 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KP Singh
Cc: kernel test robot, bpf, llvm, kbuild-all, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Benjamin Tissoires, Yosry Ahmed
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:48:08PM IST, KP Singh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:20 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi KP,
> >
> > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/KP-Singh/Add-bpf_getxattr/20220621-093013
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> > config: x86_64-randconfig-a015-20220620 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220621/202206211035.p3LxbVfK-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project af6d2a0b6825e71965f3e2701a63c239fa0ad70f)
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/dd49d2ffb18adceafa98bd517008f59aa9bc910b
> > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> > git fetch --no-tags linux-review KP-Singh/Add-bpf_getxattr/20220621-093013
> > git checkout dd49d2ffb18adceafa98bd517008f59aa9bc910b
> > # save the config file
> > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/trace/
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1185:25: warning: no previous prototype for function 'bpf_getxattr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> > ^
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1185:17: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> > noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> > ^
> > static
> > 1 warning generated.
> >
>
> So it looks like this needs a function prototype. Let's do an initial round
> of reviews on this series and I can respin with something like:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
> index 9acbc11ac7bb..3f62e5d35037 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(bpf_trace_printk,
> TP_printk("%s", __get_str(bpf_string))
> );
>
> +/* Prototypes for kernel functions exposed to tracing and LSM
> + * programs
> + */
> +ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> + const char *name, void *value, int size);
> #endif /* _TRACE_BPF_TRACE_H */
>
> (or anything else folks suggest)
>
You can silence this warning using __diag_push, e.g. see kfunc definitions in
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c.
> - KP
>
> >
> > vim +/bpf_getxattr +1185 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> >
> > 1184
> > > 1185 noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> > 1186 const char *name, void *value, int size)
> > 1187 {
> > 1188 return __vfs_getxattr(dentry, inode, name, value, size);
> > 1189 }
> > 1190
> >
> > --
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > https://01.org/lkp
--
Kartikeya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Add a bpf_getxattr kfunc
2022-06-21 12:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-06-21 16:06 ` KP Singh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: KP Singh @ 2022-06-21 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Cc: kernel test robot, bpf, llvm, kbuild-all, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Benjamin Tissoires, Yosry Ahmed
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 2:41 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:48:08PM IST, KP Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:20 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi KP,
> > >
> > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> > >
> > > [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
[...]
> >
>
> You can silence this warning using __diag_push, e.g. see kfunc definitions in
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c.
Thanks, done.
>
> > - KP
> >
> > >
> > > vim +/bpf_getxattr +1185 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > >
> > > 1184
> > > > 1185 noinline __weak ssize_t bpf_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> > > 1186 const char *name, void *value, int size)
> > > 1187 {
> > > 1188 return __vfs_getxattr(dentry, inode, name, value, size);
> > > 1189 }
> > > 1190
> > >
> > > --
> > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > > https://01.org/lkp
>
> --
> Kartikeya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-21 16:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220621012811.2683313-5-kpsingh@kernel.org>
2022-06-21 3:20 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Add a bpf_getxattr kfunc kernel test robot
2022-06-21 7:18 ` KP Singh
2022-06-21 12:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-06-21 16:06 ` KP Singh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox