* [jpoimboe:sframe-2.1 3/5] mm/init-mm.c:45:26: error: expected expression
@ 2024-09-17 11:57 kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-09-17 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Poimboeuf; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jpoimboe/linux.git sframe-2.1
head: 5b35eb7c617539f21cbe3764b0ee0c77567b0f22
commit: a0737313b793121a36e5830518ba23e53131d9fc [3/5] unwind: Introduce sframe user space unwinding
config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240917/202409172221.nJprwP5F-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bf684034844c660b778f0eba103582f582b710c9)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240917/202409172221.nJprwP5F-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409172221.nJprwP5F-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:8:
In file included from include/linux/mman.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2232:
include/linux/vmstat.h:517:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
517 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13:
In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13:
In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
| ^
In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13:
In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/init-mm.c:45:26: error: expected expression
45 | INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm),
| ^
13 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +45 mm/init-mm.c
18
19 /*
20 * For dynamically allocated mm_structs, there is a dynamically sized cpumask
21 * at the end of the structure, the size of which depends on the maximum CPU
22 * number the system can see. That way we allocate only as much memory for
23 * mm_cpumask() as needed for the hundreds, or thousands of processes that
24 * a system typically runs.
25 *
26 * Since there is only one init_mm in the entire system, keep it simple
27 * and size this cpu_bitmask to NR_CPUS.
28 */
29 struct mm_struct init_mm = {
30 .mm_mt = MTREE_INIT_EXT(mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS, init_mm.mmap_lock),
31 .pgd = swapper_pg_dir,
32 .mm_users = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
33 .mm_count = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
34 .write_protect_seq = SEQCNT_ZERO(init_mm.write_protect_seq),
35 MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER(init_mm)
36 .page_table_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.page_table_lock),
37 .arg_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.arg_lock),
38 .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_mm.mmlist),
39 #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
40 .mm_lock_seq = 0,
41 #endif
42 .user_ns = &init_user_ns,
43 .cpu_bitmap = CPU_BITS_NONE,
44 #ifdef INIT_MM_CONTEXT
> 45 INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm),
46 #endif
47 #ifdef INIT_MM_SFRAME
48 INIT_MM_SFRAME,
49 #endif
50 };
51
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-09-17 11:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-17 11:57 [jpoimboe:sframe-2.1 3/5] mm/init-mm.c:45:26: error: expected expression kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox