* [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] pkey: add syscall numbers for pkey
@ 2019-06-26 7:15 Li Wang
2019-06-26 7:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys Li Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2019-06-26 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
include/lapi/syscalls/aarch64.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/i386.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/ia64.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc64.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/s390.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/s390x.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/sparc.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/sparc64.in | 3 +++
include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in | 3 +++
11 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/aarch64.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/aarch64.in
index ce6080894..7db6e281c 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/aarch64.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/aarch64.in
@@ -265,5 +265,8 @@ mlock2 284
copy_file_range 285
preadv2 286
pwritev2 287
+pkey_mprotect 288
+pkey_alloc 289
+pkey_free 290
pidfd_send_signal 424
_sysctl 1078
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in
index 33168889f..00e99f2b9 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in
@@ -349,5 +349,8 @@ mlock2 (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+390)
copy_file_range (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+391)
preadv2 (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+392)
pwritev2 (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+393)
+pkey_mprotect (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+394)
+pkey_alloc (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+395)
+pkey_free (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+396)
statx (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+397)
pidfd_send_signal (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+424)
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/i386.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/i386.in
index 3355b9127..02f3955ba 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/i386.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/i386.in
@@ -347,5 +347,8 @@ mlock2 376
copy_file_range 377
preadv2 378
pwritev2 379
+pkey_mprotect 380
+pkey_alloc 381
+pkey_free 382
statx 383
pidfd_send_signal 424
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/ia64.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/ia64.in
index 9ac81e91e..cf9f73e85 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/ia64.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/ia64.in
@@ -305,4 +305,7 @@ mlock2 1346
copy_file_range 1347
preadv2 1348
pwritev2 1349
+pkey_mprotect 1354
+pkey_alloc 1355
+pkey_free 1356
pidfd_send_signal 1448
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc.in
index 488d6dfa9..660165d7a 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc.in
@@ -356,3 +356,6 @@ preadv2 380
pwritev2 381
statx 383
pidfd_send_signal 424
+pkey_mprotect 386
+pkey_alloc 384
+pkey_free 385
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc64.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc64.in
index 488d6dfa9..660165d7a 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc64.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc64.in
@@ -356,3 +356,6 @@ preadv2 380
pwritev2 381
statx 383
pidfd_send_signal 424
+pkey_mprotect 386
+pkey_alloc 384
+pkey_free 385
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/s390.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/s390.in
index 69b49eac0..c304ef4b7 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/s390.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/s390.in
@@ -338,4 +338,7 @@ mlock2 374
copy_file_range 375
preadv2 376
pwritev2 377
+pkey_mprotect 384
+pkey_alloc 385
+pkey_free 386
pidfd_send_signal 424
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/s390x.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/s390x.in
index 685c16f68..7d632d1dc 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/s390x.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/s390x.in
@@ -337,4 +337,7 @@ mlock2 374
copy_file_range 375
preadv2 376
pwritev2 377
+pkey_mprotect 384
+pkey_alloc 385
+pkey_free 386
pidfd_send_signal 424
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc.in
index e74b48170..ab7204663 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc.in
@@ -343,4 +343,7 @@ mlock2 356
copy_file_range 357
preadv2 358
pwritev2 359
+pkey_mprotect 362
+pkey_alloc 363
+pkey_free 364
pidfd_send_signal 424
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc64.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc64.in
index 577aa9b35..d17dce5cd 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc64.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/sparc64.in
@@ -319,4 +319,7 @@ mlock2 356
copy_file_range 357
preadv2 358
pwritev2 359
+pkey_mprotect 362
+pkey_alloc 363
+pkey_free 364
pidfd_send_signal 424
diff --git a/include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in b/include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in
index 99d387277..fdb414c10 100644
--- a/include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in
+++ b/include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in
@@ -314,5 +314,8 @@ mlock2 325
copy_file_range 326
preadv2 327
pwritev2 328
+pkey_mprotect 329
+pkey_alloc 330
+pkey_free 331
statx 332
pidfd_send_signal 424
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys
2019-06-26 7:15 [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] pkey: add syscall numbers for pkey Li Wang
@ 2019-06-26 7:15 ` Li Wang
2019-06-26 8:19 ` Jan Stancek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2019-06-26 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a Skylake-SP
server feature that provides a mechanism for enforcing page-based
protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables
when an application changes protection domains. It works by dedicating
4 previously ignored bits in each page table entry to a "protection key",
giving 16 possible keys.
Basic method for PKEYs test:
1. test allocates a pkey(e.g. PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS) via pkey_alloc()
2. pkey_mprotect() apply this pkey to a piece of memory buffer
3. check if the access right of buffer has been changed and take effect
4. remove the access right(pkey) from this buffer via pkey_mprotect()
5. check if buffer area can be read or write after removing pkey
6. pkey_free() releases the pkey after using it
Looping around this basic test on diffenrent types of memory.
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v3 --> v4
* correct syscall with __NR_ prefix
* verify the value has been wrote in nr_hugepages
* tst_res() message could print also mmap flags
* add flag_to_str() function
* .needs_root = 1
configure.ac | 1 +
runtest/syscalls | 2 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/.gitignore | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/Makefile | 8 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey.h | 50 ++++
testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey01.c | 266 +++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 328 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/.gitignore
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/Makefile
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey.h
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey01.c
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 65fc2a232..5a9b74b0a 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([ \
pidfd_send_signal \
preadv \
preadv2 \
+ pkey_mprotect \
profil \
pwritev \
pwritev2 \
diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
index c6a064481..6ea991f12 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls
+++ b/runtest/syscalls
@@ -721,6 +721,8 @@ mprotect02 mprotect02
mprotect03 mprotect03
mprotect04 mprotect04
+pkey01 pkey01
+
mq_notify01 mq_notify01
mq_notify02 mq_notify02
mq_open01 mq_open01
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6fd5addb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/pkey01
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/Makefile b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9ee2c2ea5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+# Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc.
+
+top_srcdir ?= ../../../..
+
+include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/testcases.mk
+
+include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/generic_leaf_target.mk
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey.h b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d623244eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey.h
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc.
+ */
+
+#ifndef PKEYS_H
+#define PKEYS_H
+
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
+
+#ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS 0x1
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE 0x2
+#endif
+
+#ifndef HAVE_PKEY_MPROTECT
+static inline int pkey_mprotect(void *addr, size_t len, int prot, int pkey)
+{
+ return tst_syscall(__NR_pkey_mprotect, addr, len, prot, pkey);
+}
+
+static inline int pkey_alloc(unsigned int flags, unsigned int access_rights)
+{
+ return tst_syscall(__NR_pkey_alloc, flags, access_rights);
+}
+
+static inline int pkey_free(int pkey)
+{
+ return tst_syscall(__NR_pkey_free, pkey);
+}
+#endif /* HAVE_PKEY_MPROTECT */
+
+static inline void check_pkey_support(void)
+{
+ int pkey = pkey_alloc(0, 0);
+
+ if (pkey == -1) {
+ if (errno == ENOSYS)
+ tst_brk(TCONF, "pkey_alloc is not implemented");
+ if (errno == EINVAL)
+ tst_brk(TCONF, "pku is not supported on this CPU");
+ if (errno == ENOSPC)
+ tst_brk(TCONF, "pkeys are not available for test");
+ }
+
+ pkey_free(pkey);
+}
+
+#endif /* PKEYS_H */
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey01.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e95e9eacc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pkeys/pkey01.c
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc.
+ *
+ * Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a Skylake-SP
+ * server feature that provides a mechanism for enforcing page-based
+ * protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables
+ * when an application changes protection domains. It works by dedicating
+ * 4 previously ignored bits in each page table entry to a "protection key",
+ * giving 16 possible keys.
+ *
+ * Basic method for PKEYs testing:
+ * 1. test allocates a pkey(e.g. PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS) via pkey_alloc()
+ * 2. pkey_mprotect() apply this pkey to a piece of memory(buffer)
+ * 3. check if access right of the buffer has been changed and take effect
+ * 4. remove the access right(pkey) from this buffer via pkey_mprotect()
+ * 5. check if buffer area can be read or write after removing pkey
+ * 6. pkey_free() releases the pkey after using it
+ *
+ * Looping around this basic test on diffenrent types of memory.
+ */
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+
+#include "pkey.h"
+
+#define TMP_DIR "tmp_pkey"
+#define TEST_FILE TMP_DIR"/testfile"
+#define STR "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz12345\n"
+#define PATH_VM_NRHPS "/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages"
+
+static int size;
+static int no_hugepage;
+
+static const char * const save_restore[] = {
+ "?/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages",
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct tcase {
+ unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long access_rights;
+ char *name;
+} tcases[] = {
+ {0, PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS, "PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS"},
+ {0, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE, "PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE"},
+};
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+ int i, fd;
+
+ if (access(PATH_VM_NRHPS, F_OK)) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Huge page is not supported");
+ size = getpagesize();
+ no_hugepage = 1;
+ } else {
+ int val;
+
+ SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_VM_NRHPS, "%d", 1);
+
+ SAFE_FILE_SCANF(PATH_VM_NRHPS, "%d", &val);
+ if (val != 1)
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "nr_hugepages = %d, but expect %d",
+ val, 1);
+
+ size = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO("Hugepagesize:") * 1024;
+ }
+
+ SAFE_MKDIR(TMP_DIR, 0664);
+ SAFE_MOUNT(TMP_DIR, TMP_DIR, "tmpfs", 0, NULL);
+
+ check_pkey_support();
+
+ fd = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_FILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0664);
+ for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
+ SAFE_WRITE(1, fd, STR, strlen(STR));
+
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+ SAFE_UMOUNT(TMP_DIR);
+ SAFE_RMDIR(TMP_DIR);
+}
+
+static struct mmap_param {
+ int prot;
+ int flags;
+ int fd;
+} mmap_params[] = {
+ {PROT_READ, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1},
+ {PROT_READ, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, -1},
+ {PROT_READ, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_READ, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 0},
+ {PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 0},
+
+ {PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1},
+ {PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, -1},
+ {PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, 0},
+ {PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 0},
+ {PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+
+ {PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1},
+ {PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, -1},
+ {PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 0},
+ {PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED, 0},
+
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, 0},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 0},
+
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB, -1},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 0},
+ {PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED, 0},
+};
+
+static char *flag_to_str(int flags)
+{
+ switch (flags) {
+ case MAP_PRIVATE:
+ return "MAP_PRIVATE";
+ case MAP_SHARED:
+ return "MAP_SHARED";
+ case MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE:
+ return "MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE";
+ case MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED:
+ return "MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHARED";
+ case MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_HUGETLB:
+ return "MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_HUGETLB";
+ case MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB:
+ return "MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHARED|MAP_HUGETLB";
+ default:
+ return "unknown flags";
+ }
+}
+
+static void pkey_test(struct tcase *tc, struct mmap_param *mpa)
+{
+ pid_t pid;
+ char *buffer;
+ int pkey, status;
+ int fd = mpa->fd;
+
+ if (no_hugepage && (mpa->flags & MAP_HUGETLB)) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Skip test on (%s) buffer", flag_to_str(mpa->flags));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (fd == 0)
+ fd = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_FILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0664);
+
+ buffer = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, size, mpa->prot, mpa->flags, fd, 0);
+
+ pkey = pkey_alloc(tc->flags, tc->access_rights);
+ if (pkey == -1)
+ tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "pkey_alloc failed");
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Set %s on (%s) buffer", tc->name, flag_to_str(mpa->flags));
+ if (pkey_mprotect(buffer, size, mpa->prot, pkey) == -1)
+ tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "pkey_mprotect failed");
+
+ pid = SAFE_FORK();
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ struct rlimit r;
+
+ r.rlim_cur = 1;
+ r.rlim_max = 1;
+ /* Children crash are expected, avoid dumping corefile */
+ SAFE_SETRLIMIT(RLIMIT_CORE, &r);
+
+ switch (tc->access_rights) {
+ case PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS:
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO,
+ "Read buffer success, buffer[0] = %d", *buffer);
+ break;
+ case PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE:
+ *buffer = 'a';
+ break;
+ }
+ exit(0);
+ }
+
+ SAFE_WAITPID(pid, &status, 0);
+ if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
+ if (WTERMSIG(status) == SIGSEGV) {
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Child ended by %s as expected",
+ tst_strsig(SIGSEGV));
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO, "Child ended by %s unexpected" ,
+ tst_strsig(WTERMSIG(status)));
+ }
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO,
+ "Child unexpectedly ended with %d",
+ WEXITSTATUS(status));
+ }
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Remove %s from the buffer", tc->name);
+ if (pkey_mprotect(buffer, size, mpa->prot, 0x0) == -1)
+ tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "pkey_mprotect failed");
+
+ switch (mpa->prot) {
+ case PROT_READ:
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Read buffer success, buffer[0] = %d", *buffer);
+ break;
+ case PROT_WRITE:
+ *buffer = 'a';
+ break;
+ case PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE:
+ case PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC:
+ *buffer = 'a';
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Read & Write buffer success, buffer[0] = %d", *buffer);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (fd >= 0)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+
+ SAFE_MUNMAP(buffer, size);
+
+ if (pkey_free(pkey) == -1)
+ tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "pkey_free failed");
+}
+
+static void verify_pkey(unsigned int i)
+{
+ long unsigned int j;
+ struct mmap_param *mpa;
+
+ struct tcase *tc = &tcases[i];
+
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(mmap_params); j++) {
+ mpa = &mmap_params[j];
+
+ pkey_test(tc, mpa);
+ }
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
+ .needs_root = 1,
+ .forks_child = 1,
+ .test = verify_pkey,
+ .setup = setup,
+ .cleanup = cleanup,
+ .save_restore = save_restore,
+};
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys
2019-06-26 7:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys Li Wang
@ 2019-06-26 8:19 ` Jan Stancek
2019-06-26 9:40 ` Li Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2019-06-26 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
----- Original Message -----
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + int i, fd;
> +
> + if (access(PATH_VM_NRHPS, F_OK)) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Huge page is not supported");
> + size = getpagesize();
> + no_hugepage = 1;
> + } else {
> + int val;
> +
> + SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_VM_NRHPS, "%d", 1);
This is still SAFE write, which may trigger TBROK:
# ./pkey01
tst_test.c:1100: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
safe_file_ops.c:301: BROK: Failed to close FILE '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' at pkey01.c:67: EOPNOTSUPP
safe_macros.c:773: WARN: pkey01.c:91: umount(tmp_pkey) failed: ENOENT
safe_macros.c:184: WARN: pkey01.c:92: rmdir(tmp_pkey) failed: ENOENT
> +
> + SAFE_FILE_SCANF(PATH_VM_NRHPS, "%d", &val);
safe_file_ops.c:157: BROK: The FILE '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' ended prematurely at pkey01.c:69
> + if (val != 1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "nr_hugepages = %d, but expect %d",
> + val, 1);
> +
> + size = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO("Hugepagesize:") * 1024;
> + }
> +
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys
2019-06-26 8:19 ` Jan Stancek
@ 2019-06-26 9:40 ` Li Wang
2019-06-26 9:59 ` Jan Stancek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2019-06-26 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > +
> > +static void setup(void)
> > +{
> > + int i, fd;
> > +
> > + if (access(PATH_VM_NRHPS, F_OK)) {
> > + tst_res(TINFO, "Huge page is not supported");
> > + size = getpagesize();
> > + no_hugepage = 1;
> > + } else {
> > + int val;
> > +
> > + SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_VM_NRHPS, "%d", 1);
>
> This is still SAFE write, which may trigger TBROK:
>
> # ./pkey01
> tst_test.c:1100: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> safe_file_ops.c:301: BROK: Failed to close FILE
> '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' at pkey01.c:67: EOPNOTSUPP
> safe_macros.c:773: WARN: pkey01.c:91: umount(tmp_pkey) failed: ENOENT
> safe_macros.c:184: WARN: pkey01.c:92: rmdir(tmp_pkey) failed: ENOENT
>
Er, sorry about still not working here.
If a system(e.g PowerKVM guest) configured with NO huge page support, then
the file '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' exist but EOPNOTSUPP to read/write. In
this key01, perhaps I shouldn't use the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" to detect
that at the beginning.
Seems the correct way is to use "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/" for huge page
detecting and leave the SAFE_FILE_* still in setup(). Because we need to
catch the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" open/close or read/write issue in
testing.
What do you think? Should we mask the EOPNOTSUPP as a TCONF skipping or
others?
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20190626/8ce26f4e/attachment-0001.htm>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys
2019-06-26 9:40 ` Li Wang
@ 2019-06-26 9:59 ` Jan Stancek
2019-07-01 7:11 ` Li Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2019-06-26 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > +
> > > +static void setup(void)
> > > +{
> > > + int i, fd;
> > > +
> > > + if (access(PATH_VM_NRHPS, F_OK)) {
> > > + tst_res(TINFO, "Huge page is not supported");
> > > + size = getpagesize();
> > > + no_hugepage = 1;
> > > + } else {
> > > + int val;
> > > +
> > > + SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_VM_NRHPS, "%d", 1);
> >
> > This is still SAFE write, which may trigger TBROK:
> >
> > # ./pkey01
> > tst_test.c:1100: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > safe_file_ops.c:301: BROK: Failed to close FILE
> > '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' at pkey01.c:67: EOPNOTSUPP
> > safe_macros.c:773: WARN: pkey01.c:91: umount(tmp_pkey) failed: ENOENT
> > safe_macros.c:184: WARN: pkey01.c:92: rmdir(tmp_pkey) failed: ENOENT
> >
>
> Er, sorry about still not working here.
>
> If a system(e.g PowerKVM guest) configured with NO huge page support, then
> the file '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' exist but EOPNOTSUPP to read/write. In
> this key01, perhaps I shouldn't use the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" to detect
> that at the beginning.
>
> Seems the correct way is to use "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/" for huge page
> detecting and leave the SAFE_FILE_* still in setup(). Because we need to
> catch the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" open/close or read/write issue in
> testing.
That should work, I see we used that in some tests already.
>
> What do you think? Should we mask the EOPNOTSUPP as a TCONF skipping or
> others?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Li Wang
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys
2019-06-26 9:59 ` Jan Stancek
@ 2019-07-01 7:11 ` Li Wang
2019-07-01 7:23 ` Jan Stancek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2019-07-01 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ...
> >
> > If a system(e.g PowerKVM guest) configured with NO huge page support,
> then
> > the file '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' exist but EOPNOTSUPP to read/write.
> In
> > this key01, perhaps I shouldn't use the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" to
> detect
> > that at the beginning.
> >
> > Seems the correct way is to use "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/" for huge page
> > detecting and leave the SAFE_FILE_* still in setup(). Because we need to
> > catch the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" open/close or read/write issue in
> > testing.
>
> That should work, I see we used that in some tests already.
>
Thanks, should I format new patch v5? or any more comments?
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20190701/c6f7a909/attachment.htm>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys
2019-07-01 7:11 ` Li Wang
@ 2019-07-01 7:23 ` Jan Stancek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2019-07-01 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > ...
> > >
> > > If a system(e.g PowerKVM guest) configured with NO huge page support,
> > then
> > > the file '/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' exist but EOPNOTSUPP to read/write.
> > In
> > > this key01, perhaps I shouldn't use the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" to
> > detect
> > > that at the beginning.
> > >
> > > Seems the correct way is to use "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/" for huge page
> > > detecting and leave the SAFE_FILE_* still in setup(). Because we need to
> > > catch the "/proc/.../nr_hugepages" open/close or read/write issue in
> > > testing.
> >
> > That should work, I see we used that in some tests already.
> >
>
> Thanks, should I format new patch v5? or any more comments?
Yes, please send v5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-01 7:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-26 7:15 [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] pkey: add syscall numbers for pkey Li Wang
2019-06-26 7:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pkey: add test for memory protection keys Li Wang
2019-06-26 8:19 ` Jan Stancek
2019-06-26 9:40 ` Li Wang
2019-06-26 9:59 ` Jan Stancek
2019-07-01 7:11 ` Li Wang
2019-07-01 7:23 ` Jan Stancek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox