From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 2/6] fzsync: Reset delay bias
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:50:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eegphf88.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEYxwOr3tOJdnz+j@yuki.lan>
Hello,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> writes:
> Hi!
>> If the delay bias a preserved then it breaks tests which have multiple
> ^
> is?
Yup, typo.
>
>> scenarios and/or use -i. The test author could reset it manually in
>> this case, but it's likely to be error prone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
>
> Other than that this looks OK.
>
> Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
>
>> ---
>> include/tst_fuzzy_sync.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/tst_fuzzy_sync.h b/include/tst_fuzzy_sync.h
>> index 4141f5c64..b8841d96d 100644
>> --- a/include/tst_fuzzy_sync.h
>> +++ b/include/tst_fuzzy_sync.h
>> @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ static void tst_fzsync_pair_reset(struct tst_fzsync_pair *pair,
>> tst_init_stat(&pair->diff_ab);
>> tst_init_stat(&pair->spins_avg);
>> pair->delay = 0;
>> + pair->delay_bias = 0;
>> pair->sampling = pair->min_samples;
>>
>> pair->exec_loop = 0;
>> --
>> 2.30.1
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Thank you,
Richard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 15:51 [LTP] [PATCH 0/6] Fuzzy Sync yielding and validation test Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-05 15:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/6] fzsync: Add self test Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-08 15:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-03-08 16:18 ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-05 15:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/6] fzsync: Reset delay bias Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-08 14:16 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-03-08 14:50 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2021-03-05 15:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/6] fzsync: Correctly print positive lower delay range bound Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-08 14:18 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-03-05 15:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/6] fzsync: Add sched_yield for single core machine Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-05 15:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH 5/6] fzsync: Move yield check out of loop and add yield to delay Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-08 11:32 ` Leo Liang
2021-03-08 14:48 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-03-05 15:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH 6/6] fzsync: Check processor affinity Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-08 11:33 ` Leo Liang
2021-03-08 14:53 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-03-08 15:30 ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-03-09 13:45 ` [LTP] [PATCH 0/6] Fuzzy Sync yielding and validation test Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eegphf88.fsf@suse.de \
--to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox