[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel]

LTP project decided to move from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
to https://patchwork.kernel.org/.

Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
 .b4-config                       | 2 +-
 .github/pull_request_template.md | 2 +-
 README.rst                       | 2 +-
 ci/tools/patchwork.sh            | 2 +-
 doc/maintainers/patch_review.rst | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.b4-config b/.b4-config
index aea68ad8f6..c2766cd4fb 100644
--- a/.b4-config
+++ b/.b4-config
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 # See https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/config.html
 [b4]
     send-series-to = Linux Test Project <ltp@lists.linux.it>
-    pw-url = https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
+    pw-url = https://patchwork.kernel.org/
     pw-project = ltp
 
     # other checkpatch.pl options from .checkpatch.conf are used
diff --git a/.github/pull_request_template.md b/.github/pull_request_template.md
index e2c076ddd5..1149edf7c5 100644
--- a/.github/pull_request_template.md
+++ b/.github/pull_request_template.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 * Although we *occasionally* also accept GitHub pull requests, the *preferred* way is sending patches to our mailing list: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/
 There is an example how to use it: https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-Case-Tutorial#7-submitting-the-test-for-review (using git format-patch and git send-email).
 LTP mailing list is archived at: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/.
-We also have a patchwork instance: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/.
+We also have a patchwork instance: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ltp/list/.
 
 * Commits should be signed: Signed-off-by: Your Name <me@example.org>, see
 https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
index 9853222fbe..06600cf20f 100644
--- a/README.rst
+++ b/README.rst
@@ -24,6 +24,6 @@ Some references:
 * `Source code <https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp>`_
 * `Releases <https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/releases>`_
 * `Mailing List <http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp>`_
-* `Working patches (patchwork) <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/>`_
+* `Working patches (patchwork) <https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ltp/list/>`_
 * `Working patches (lore.kernel.org) <https://lore.kernel.org/ltp>`_
 * `#ltp @ libera chat <https://libera.chat/>`_
diff --git a/ci/tools/patchwork.sh b/ci/tools/patchwork.sh
index 5c58bee5d8..71155704c0 100755
--- a/ci/tools/patchwork.sh
+++ b/ci/tools/patchwork.sh
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 #
 # Copyright (c) 2025 Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
 
-PATCHWORK_URL="${PATCHWORK_URL:-https://patchwork.ozlabs.org}"
+PATCHWORK_URL="${PATCHWORK_URL:-https://patchwork.kernel.org}"
 PATCHWORK_SINCE="${PATCHWORK_SINCE:-3600}"
 PATCHWORK_MAX_SINCE="${PATCHWORK_MAX_SINCE:-86400}"
 PATCHWORK_CI_PREFIX="${PATCHWORK_CI_PREFIX:-github-build}"
diff --git a/doc/maintainers/patch_review.rst b/doc/maintainers/patch_review.rst
index 50e4f8ccf8..0665e492ec 100644
--- a/doc/maintainers/patch_review.rst
+++ b/doc/maintainers/patch_review.rst
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Commit messages should have
 * LTP documentation should be kept up to date.
 
 After patch is accepted or rejected, set correct state and archive in the
-`LTP patchwork instance <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/>`_.
+`LTP patchwork instance <https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ltp/list/>`_.
 
 New tests
 ---------
-- 
2.53.0


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[linuxtestproject.agent]

Hi Petr,

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 07:45:47AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

Verdict - Reviewed

---
Note:

The agent can sometimes produce false positives although often its
findings are genuine. If you find issues with the review, please
comment this email or ignore the suggestions.

Regards,
LTP AI Reviewer

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Avinesh Kumar via ltp]

Hi Petr,

This is great, Thank you!

Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>

Regards,
Avinesh


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Andrea Cervesato via ltp]

Reviewed-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>

--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel]

Hi all,

since we have all active LTP maintainers enabled as patchwork maintainers in the
kernel.org instance [1] I'd like in few hours merge this patch to finally move
to patchwork.kernel.org. FYI we already have 18 patches on it, AI review is
there as well.

@Cyril @Li @Jan: Could you please ack this patch?

I wonder when to stop receiving patches on the old ozlabs instance [2] We should
probably ask for it soon so that people don't think we stop maintaining it. I
hoped that the last patch on that instance would be "Switch to
patchwork.kernel.org" [3], but there are new patches now. OTOH we then no longer
get updates for the old patchsets (there are 54 patches which aren't on the new
kernel.org instance + already 6 duplicates).

Other question is when to ask about for removing the old instance. I'd keep it
at least for some time (can be useful + there might be bookmarks, instance has
13079 patches, first one in 2018-02-28). WDYT?

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ltp/
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/
[3] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20260731054548.133241-1-pvorel@suse.cz/


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> since we have all active LTP maintainers enabled as patchwork maintainers in the
> kernel.org instance [1] I'd like in few hours merge this patch to finally move
> to patchwork.kernel.org. FYI we already have 18 patches on it, AI review is
> there as well.
> 
> @Cyril @Li @Jan: Could you please ack this patch?

Acked-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>

Btw, we may want to add the patchwork link into kernel MINTAINTERS file, 

> I wonder when to stop receiving patches on the old ozlabs instance [2] We should
> probably ask for it soon so that people don't think we stop maintaining it.

Sounds about right.

> I hoped that the last patch on that instance would be "Switch to
> patchwork.kernel.org" [3], but there are new patches now. OTOH we then no longer
> get updates for the old patchsets (there are 54 patches which aren't on the new
> kernel.org instance + already 6 duplicates).
>
> Other question is when to ask about for removing the old instance. I'd keep it
> at least for some time (can be useful + there might be bookmarks, instance has
> 13079 patches, first one in 2018-02-28). WDYT?

I would keep it around at least for a year or two, I sometimes look up
old patches there.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Andrea Cervesato via ltp]

> I would keep it around at least for a year or two, I sometimes look up
> old patches there.

that looks like a really long period of time. lore.kernel.org/ltp/
is not enough?

--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Li Wang]

Andrea Cervesato wrote:

> > I would keep it around at least for a year or two, I sometimes look up
> > old patches there.
> 
> that looks like a really long period of time. lore.kernel.org/ltp/
> is not enough?

I guess Cyril means to look back the history of patch discussion when needed.
 
Or, can we tar the mail discussion for recent years and store it somewhere?

Anyway, for the patch:

Reviewed-by: Li Wang <li.wang@linux.dev>

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Li, all,

> Andrea Cervesato wrote:

> > > I would keep it around at least for a year or two, I sometimes look up
> > > old patches there.

> > that looks like a really long period of time. lore.kernel.org/ltp/
> > is not enough?

> I guess Cyril means to look back the history of patch discussion when needed.

Well, for the patch history we have LTP ML archive [1] and lore (has longer
history than patchwork [2]). Although patch view in patchwork might be easier to
read.

I meant something different: people have probably sent LTP patchwork ozlabs
instance links to other, put in bugzilla etc. Patchwork use Message-id, therefore
patch link [3] can be easily converted to lore [4]. Patch comment [5] don't.
That's why I'd keep abandoned LTP instance for some time, but maybe we just don't care.
Obviously keeping it around depends on ozlabs maintainers decision.

> Or, can we tar the mail discussion for recent years and store it somewhere?

FYI we already have history in git as an public-inbox [6]:
git clone https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/

> Anyway, for the patch:

> Reviewed-by: Li Wang <li.wang@linux.dev>

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/?t=20180216133201
[3] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20260731054548.133241-1-pvorel@suse.cz/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260731054548.133241-1-pvorel@suse.cz/
[5] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/comment/3731798/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/_/text/mirror/

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Andrea Cervesato via ltp]

> FYI we already have history in git as an public-inbox [6]:
> git clone https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/

+1

--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel]

Hi all,

FYI LTP CI user is on the patchwork.kernel.org => I merged the patch. We finally
switch to patchwork.kernel.org. Thanks to all for your cooperation.

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> that looks like a really long period of time. lore.kernel.org/ltp/
> is not enough?

I do not mean maintaining it, stop it from receiving emails and keep it
rotting there.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel]

> Hi!
> > that looks like a really long period of time. lore.kernel.org/ltp/
> > is not enough?

> I do not mean maintaining it, stop it from receiving emails and keep it
> rotting there.

+1, at least for some time.

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Cyril, all,

> Hi!
> > since we have all active LTP maintainers enabled as patchwork maintainers in the
> > kernel.org instance [1] I'd like in few hours merge this patch to finally move
> > to patchwork.kernel.org. FYI we already have 18 patches on it, AI review is
> > there as well.

> > @Cyril @Li @Jan: Could you please ack this patch?

> Acked-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>

Thank you!

> Btw, we may want to add the patchwork link into kernel MINTAINTERS file, 

Very good point, thanks! I'll send a patch adding a new one once we switch.

> > I wonder when to stop receiving patches on the old ozlabs instance [2] We should
> > probably ask for it soon so that people don't think we stop maintaining it.

> Sounds about right.

> > I hoped that the last patch on that instance would be "Switch to
> > patchwork.kernel.org" [3], but there are new patches now. OTOH we then no longer
> > get updates for the old patchsets (there are 54 patches which aren't on the new
> > kernel.org instance + already 6 duplicates).

> > Other question is when to ask about for removing the old instance. I'd keep it
> > at least for some time (can be useful + there might be bookmarks, instance has
> > 13079 patches, first one in 2018-02-28). WDYT?

> I would keep it around at least for a year or two, I sometimes look up
> old patches there.

+1

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Andrea Cervesato via ltp]

Hi Petr,

> to patchwork.kernel.org. FYI we already have 18 patches on it, AI review is
> there as well.

Unfortunately AI review doesn't work there at the moment, I'm waiting for
the LTP CI user set inside the new patchwork instance. But for now, we can
backup this with my personal token, if needed.

Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Andrea,

> Hi Petr,

> > to patchwork.kernel.org. FYI we already have 18 patches on it, AI review is
> > there as well.

> Unfortunately AI review doesn't work there at the moment, I'm waiting for
> the LTP CI user set inside the new patchwork instance. But for now, we can
> backup this with my personal token, if needed.

Good catch, thanks! Although AI reviews are posted to both instances (they both
get mails from LTP ML), the review status does not work.  That's due LTP CI user
not being part of LTP maintainers on patchwork.kernel.org [1] (as it is on the
old instance [2]) that should be solved soon. Please let me know if there is
something else missing.

FYI new instance also have only REST API enabled, the deprecated XML-RPC API is
disabled. Fortunately Andrea's ci/tools/patchwork.sh script uses the REST API :).

If somebody uses pwclient, it requires ~/.pwclientrc modification:
-url = https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/xmlrpc/
+url = https://patchwork.kernel.org/api/
+backend = rest

I also wonder if (once we switch) should send an announcement to LTP ML.

And (how ironically) atm patchwork.kernel.org respond really slowly for me,
patchwork.ozlabs.org does :). I suppose that should be just temporarily.

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ltp/
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Andrea Cervesato via ltp]

> And (how ironically) atm patchwork.kernel.org respond really slowly for me,
> patchwork.ozlabs.org does :). I suppose that should be just temporarily.

sigh, this is annoying.. I really hope it's just a moment.

--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Jan Stancek via ltp]

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 11:14 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> since we have all active LTP maintainers enabled as patchwork maintainers in the
> kernel.org instance [1] I'd like in few hours merge this patch to finally move
> to patchwork.kernel.org. FYI we already have 18 patches on it, AI review is
> there as well.
>
> @Cyril @Li @Jan: Could you please ack this patch?

Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>

>
> I wonder when to stop receiving patches on the old ozlabs instance [2] We should
> probably ask for it soon so that people don't think we stop maintaining it. I

Agreed, I think we already can ask for that.

> hoped that the last patch on that instance would be "Switch to
> patchwork.kernel.org" [3], but there are new patches now. OTOH we then no longer
> get updates for the old patchsets (there are 54 patches which aren't on the new
> kernel.org instance + already 6 duplicates).
>
> Other question is when to ask about for removing the old instance. I'd keep it
> at least for some time (can be useful + there might be bookmarks, instance has
> 13079 patches, first one in 2018-02-28). WDYT?

I'd keep it too for now.

>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ltp/
> [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/
> [3] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20260731054548.133241-1-pvorel@suse.cz/
>


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp