* [PATCH mptcp-next 1/7] mptcp: move the retrans loop to a separate helper
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 16:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/7] mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler Paolo Abeni
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
This is a cleanup in order to make the next patch simpler.
No functional change intended.
Tested-by: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 7c8180d8d5ef..a21b10a8c5d3 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2791,41 +2791,14 @@ static void mptcp_check_fastclose(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
sk_error_report(sk);
}
-static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
+/* Retransmit the specified data fragment on all the selected subflows. */
+static int __mptcp_push_retrans(struct sock *sk, struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag)
{
struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = { .data_lock_held = true, };
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
- struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
struct sock *ssk;
- int ret, err;
- u16 len = 0;
-
- mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
-
- /* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
- err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
- dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
- if (!dfrag) {
- if (mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk)) {
- struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
-
- WRITE_ONCE(icsk->icsk_retransmits,
- icsk->icsk_retransmits + 1);
- mptcp_set_datafin_timeout(sk);
- mptcp_send_ack(msk);
-
- goto reset_timer;
- }
-
- if (!mptcp_send_head(sk))
- goto clear_scheduled;
-
- goto reset_timer;
- }
-
- if (err)
- goto reset_timer;
+ int ret, len = 0;
mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
if (READ_ONCE(subflow->scheduled)) {
@@ -2853,7 +2826,7 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
!msk->allow_subflows) {
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->fallback_lock);
release_sock(ssk);
- goto clear_scheduled;
+ return -1;
}
while (info.sent < info.limit) {
@@ -2876,6 +2849,45 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
release_sock(ssk);
}
}
+ return len;
+}
+
+static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
+ int err, len;
+
+ mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
+
+ /* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
+ err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
+ dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
+ if (!dfrag) {
+ if (mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk)) {
+ struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(icsk->icsk_retransmits,
+ icsk->icsk_retransmits + 1);
+ mptcp_set_datafin_timeout(sk);
+ mptcp_send_ack(msk);
+
+ goto reset_timer;
+ }
+
+ if (!mptcp_send_head(sk))
+ goto clear_scheduled;
+
+ goto reset_timer;
+ }
+
+ if (err)
+ goto reset_timer;
+
+ len = __mptcp_push_retrans(sk, dfrag);
+ if (len < 0)
+ goto clear_scheduled;
msk->bytes_retrans += len;
dfrag->already_sent = max(dfrag->already_sent, len);
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next 2/7] mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/7] mptcp: move the retrans loop to a separate helper Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 16:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-06 9:31 ` Geliang Tang
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 3/7] mptcp: let the retrans scheduler do its job Paolo Abeni
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
This allow separating the stale logic invocation and the retrans
scheduler, and will simplify the next patch.
It's also a cleaner design as the retrans scheduler has currently
too many side effects. As a possible downside, the retrans work will
now traverse the subflows list additional times; that does not matter
much, as this is slowpath.
While at it, pick more accurate names for the involved helpers
Also note that the scheduler and the stale logic may observe different
subflow statues, as no lock is acquired. This is intentional and not
harmful, worst case leading to slower retransmissions.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 ++--
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 5e499ec1c50a..9ce50e8a149d 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_is_backup(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock_common *skc)
return msk->pm.ops->get_priority(msk, &skc_local);
}
-static void mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
+static void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *iter, *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
@@ -1098,22 +1098,34 @@ static void mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct soc
}
}
-void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
+void mptcp_pm_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
- struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
- u32 rcv_tstamp = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_tstamp);
-
- /* keep track of rtx periods with no progress */
- if (!subflow->stale_count) {
- subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp = rcv_tstamp;
- subflow->stale_count++;
- } else if (subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp == rcv_tstamp) {
- if (subflow->stale_count < U8_MAX)
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+ struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+ u32 rcv_tstamp;
+
+ if (!__mptcp_subflow_active(subflow))
+ continue;
+
+ /* No data outstanding at TCP level? not stale */
+ if (tcp_rtx_and_write_queues_empty(ssk))
+ continue;
+
+ /* keep track of rtx periods with no progress */
+ rcv_tstamp = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_tstamp);
+ if (!subflow->stale_count) {
+ subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp = rcv_tstamp;
subflow->stale_count++;
- mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
- } else {
- subflow->stale_count = 0;
- mptcp_subflow_set_active(subflow);
+ } else if (subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp == rcv_tstamp) {
+ if (subflow->stale_count < U8_MAX)
+ subflow->stale_count++;
+ mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
+ } else {
+ subflow->stale_count = 0;
+ mptcp_subflow_set_active(subflow);
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index a21b10a8c5d3..88167edc6598 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2469,7 +2469,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
/* still data outstanding at TCP level? skip this */
if (!tcp_rtx_and_write_queues_empty(ssk)) {
- mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
min_stale_count = min_t(int, min_stale_count, subflow->stale_count);
continue;
}
@@ -2859,9 +2858,10 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
int err, len;
+ mptcp_pm_chk_stale(msk);
+
mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
- /* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
if (!dfrag) {
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 0042112f118a..c5a9c3d3f223 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_parse_entry(struct nlattr *attr, struct genl_info *info,
bool mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(const struct sock *sk,
const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc,
const struct mptcp_addr_info *rem);
-void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk);
+void mptcp_pm_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
void mptcp_pm_new_connection(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk, int server_side);
void mptcp_pm_fully_established(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk);
bool mptcp_pm_allow_new_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 2/7] mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/7] mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-06 9:31 ` Geliang Tang
2026-08-06 16:57 ` Paolo Abeni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2026-08-06 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for this new version of the series. I have rebased the MPTCP
KTLS code onto it, and all tests passed.
On Wed, 2026-08-05 at 18:17 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> This allow separating the stale logic invocation and the retrans
> scheduler, and will simplify the next patch.
>
> It's also a cleaner design as the retrans scheduler has currently
> too many side effects. As a possible downside, the retrans work will
> now traverse the subflows list additional times; that does not matter
> much, as this is slowpath.
However, this patch makes the KTLS selftests significantly slower -
specifically, this test case now takes several hundred seconds to
complete, whereas it previously finished in just a few seconds:
chunked_sendfile(_metadata, self, 1, 4096);
Is there any way we can make it run faster?
Thanks,
-Geliang
>
> While at it, pick more accurate names for the involved helpers
>
> Also note that the scheduler and the stale logic may observe
> different
> subflow statues, as no lock is acquired. This is intentional and not
> harmful, worst case leading to slower retransmissions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/mptcp/pm.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 ++--
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> index 5e499ec1c50a..9ce50e8a149d 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> @@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_is_backup(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> struct sock_common *skc)
> return msk->pm.ops->get_priority(msk, &skc_local);
> }
>
> -static void mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock
> *msk, struct sock *ssk)
> +static void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> struct sock *ssk)
> {
> struct mptcp_subflow_context *iter, *subflow =
> mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
> struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
> @@ -1098,22 +1098,34 @@ static void mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(const
> struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct soc
> }
> }
>
> -void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct
> sock *ssk)
> +void mptcp_pm_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> {
> - struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow =
> mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
> - u32 rcv_tstamp = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_tstamp);
> -
> - /* keep track of rtx periods with no progress */
> - if (!subflow->stale_count) {
> - subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp = rcv_tstamp;
> - subflow->stale_count++;
> - } else if (subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp == rcv_tstamp) {
> - if (subflow->stale_count < U8_MAX)
> + struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> +
> + mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
> + struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
> + u32 rcv_tstamp;
> +
> + if (!__mptcp_subflow_active(subflow))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* No data outstanding at TCP level? not stale */
> + if (tcp_rtx_and_write_queues_empty(ssk))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* keep track of rtx periods with no progress */
> + rcv_tstamp = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_tstamp);
> + if (!subflow->stale_count) {
> + subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp = rcv_tstamp;
> subflow->stale_count++;
> - mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
> - } else {
> - subflow->stale_count = 0;
> - mptcp_subflow_set_active(subflow);
> + } else if (subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp == rcv_tstamp)
> {
> + if (subflow->stale_count < U8_MAX)
> + subflow->stale_count++;
> + mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
> + } else {
> + subflow->stale_count = 0;
> + mptcp_subflow_set_active(subflow);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index a21b10a8c5d3..88167edc6598 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -2469,7 +2469,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(struct
> mptcp_sock *msk)
>
> /* still data outstanding at TCP level? skip this */
> if (!tcp_rtx_and_write_queues_empty(ssk)) {
> - mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
> min_stale_count = min_t(int,
> min_stale_count, subflow->stale_count);
> continue;
> }
> @@ -2859,9 +2858,10 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
> struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
> int err, len;
>
> + mptcp_pm_chk_stale(msk);
> +
> mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
>
> - /* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
> err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
> dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
> if (!dfrag) {
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 0042112f118a..c5a9c3d3f223 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_parse_entry(struct nlattr *attr,
> struct genl_info *info,
> bool mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(const struct sock *sk,
> const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc,
> const struct mptcp_addr_info
> *rem);
> -void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct
> sock *ssk);
> +void mptcp_pm_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
> void mptcp_pm_new_connection(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct
> sock *ssk, int server_side);
> void mptcp_pm_fully_established(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct
> sock *ssk);
> bool mptcp_pm_allow_new_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 2/7] mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler
2026-08-06 9:31 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2026-08-06 16:57 ` Paolo Abeni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-06 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang, mptcp
On 8/6/26 11:31 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Thank you for this new version of the series. I have rebased the MPTCP
> KTLS code onto it, and all tests passed.
>
> On Wed, 2026-08-05 at 18:17 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> This allow separating the stale logic invocation and the retrans
>> scheduler, and will simplify the next patch.
>>
>> It's also a cleaner design as the retrans scheduler has currently
>> too many side effects. As a possible downside, the retrans work will
>> now traverse the subflows list additional times; that does not matter
>> much, as this is slowpath.
>
> However, this patch makes the KTLS selftests significantly slower -
> specifically, this test case now takes several hundred seconds to
> complete, whereas it previously finished in just a few seconds:
>
> chunked_sendfile(_metadata, self, 1, 4096);
>
> Is there any way we can make it run faster?
I guess you test on top of the whole series?
If you tested on top of the whole series, I think the slowdown is due to
the issue in patch 3/7 noted by sashiko gemini and should be fixed in v2.
/P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next 3/7] mptcp: let the retrans scheduler do its job
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/7] mptcp: move the retrans loop to a separate helper Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/7] mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 16:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-06 7:39 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 4/7] mptcp: explicitly drop over memory limits Paolo Abeni
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Currently the MPTCP core enforces that when MPTCP-level retrans timer
fires, at most a single dfrag is retransmitted. If some corner-cases it
may be necessary retransmit multiple dfrags, and the MPTCP socket will
need to wait multiple retrans timeout to accomplish that.
Remove the mentioned constraint, allowing to transmit multiple dfrags per
retrans period, as long as the scheduler keeps selecting subflows for
retransmissions and pending data is available in the rtx queue.
The default scheduler will transmit a dfrag per available subflow.
Tested-by: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
v<n> -> v<n+1>:
- many cleanups, since the stale logic is invoked only once outside
the main loop
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 88167edc6598..4099ca915f70 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1142,13 +1142,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
mptcp_write_space(sk);
}
-static void mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
-{
- mptcp_data_lock(sk);
- __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
- mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
-}
-
static void mptcp_enter_memory_pressure(struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
@@ -2790,8 +2783,12 @@ static void mptcp_check_fastclose(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
sk_error_report(sk);
}
-/* Retransmit the specified data fragment on all the selected subflows. */
-static int __mptcp_push_retrans(struct sock *sk, struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag)
+/*
+ * Retransmit the specified data fragment on all the selected subflows,
+ * starting from the specified sequence
+ */
+static int __mptcp_push_retrans(struct sock *sk, struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag,
+ u64 sent_seq)
{
struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = { .data_lock_held = true, };
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
@@ -2801,6 +2798,7 @@ static int __mptcp_push_retrans(struct sock *sk, struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag)
mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
if (READ_ONCE(subflow->scheduled)) {
+ u16 offset = sent_seq - dfrag->data_seq;
u16 copied = 0;
mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(subflow, false);
@@ -2810,7 +2808,7 @@ static int __mptcp_push_retrans(struct sock *sk, struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag)
lock_sock(ssk);
/* limit retransmission to the bytes already sent on some subflows */
- info.sent = 0;
+ info.sent = offset;
info.limit = READ_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled) ? dfrag->data_len :
dfrag->already_sent;
@@ -2856,15 +2854,60 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
+ u64 retrans_seq, sent_seq;
+ bool need_retrans;
int err, len;
mptcp_pm_chk_stale(msk);
- mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
+ for (;;) {
+ /* Get an updated and consistent rtx queue status. */
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
+ __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
+ retrans_seq = msk->snd_una;
+ dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
+ need_retrans = !!dfrag;
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
+
+ err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
+ if (err)
+ break;
- err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
- dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
- if (!dfrag) {
+ /* `already_sent` can be 0 for `dfrag` belonging to the RTX
+ * queue due to __mptcp_retransmit_pending_data().
+ */
+ if (!dfrag || !dfrag->already_sent)
+ break;
+
+ /* Can fail only in case of fallback. */
+ len = __mptcp_push_retrans(sk, dfrag, retrans_seq);
+ if (len < 0)
+ goto clear_scheduled;
+
+ retrans_seq += len;
+ msk->bytes_retrans += len;
+ dfrag->already_sent = max_t(u16, dfrag->already_sent,
+ retrans_seq - dfrag->data_seq);
+
+ /* With csum enabled, retransmission can send new data. */
+ sent_seq = dfrag->already_sent + dfrag->data_seq;
+ if (after64(sent_seq, msk->snd_nxt))
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt, sent_seq);
+
+ /* Attempt the next fragment only if the current one is
+ * completely retransmitted.
+ */
+ if (before64(retrans_seq, dfrag->data_seq + dfrag->data_len))
+ break;
+
+ dfrag = list_is_last(&dfrag->list, &msk->rtx_queue) ?
+ NULL : list_next_entry(dfrag, list);
+ if (!dfrag)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Attempt data-fin retransmission only when the RTX queue is empty. */
+ if (!need_retrans) {
if (mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk)) {
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
@@ -2872,30 +2915,13 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
icsk->icsk_retransmits + 1);
mptcp_set_datafin_timeout(sk);
mptcp_send_ack(msk);
-
goto reset_timer;
}
if (!mptcp_send_head(sk))
goto clear_scheduled;
-
- goto reset_timer;
}
- if (err)
- goto reset_timer;
-
- len = __mptcp_push_retrans(sk, dfrag);
- if (len < 0)
- goto clear_scheduled;
-
- msk->bytes_retrans += len;
- dfrag->already_sent = max(dfrag->already_sent, len);
-
- /* With csum enabled retransmission can send new data. */
- if (after64(dfrag->already_sent + dfrag->data_seq, msk->snd_nxt))
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt, dfrag->already_sent + dfrag->data_seq);
-
reset_timer:
mptcp_check_and_set_pending(sk);
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 3/7] mptcp: let the retrans scheduler do its job
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 3/7] mptcp: let the retrans scheduler do its job Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-06 7:39 ` Paolo Abeni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-06 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
On 8/5/26 6:17 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> @@ -2856,15 +2854,60 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
> + u64 retrans_seq, sent_seq;
> + bool need_retrans;
> int err, len;
>
> mptcp_pm_chk_stale(msk);
>
> - mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
> + for (;;) {
> + /* Get an updated and consistent rtx queue status. */
> + mptcp_data_lock(sk);
> + __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
> + retrans_seq = msk->snd_una;
> + dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
> + need_retrans = !!dfrag;
> + mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
too much cleanup here. This needs more work
/P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next 4/7] mptcp: explicitly drop over memory limits
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 3/7] mptcp: let the retrans scheduler do its job Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 16:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 5/7] mptcp: enforce hard limit on backlog flushing Paolo Abeni
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Currently the enforcement of the rcvbuf constraint is implemented
when moving the skbs into the msk receive or OoO queue, keeping the
incoming skbs in the subflow queue when over limit.
Under significant memory pressure the above can cause permanent data
transfer stalls, as the skb needed to make forward progress can be
stuck in a subflow queue.
Over memory limits, drop the incoming skb, relaying on MPTCP-level
retransmissions.
Note that fallback socket must perform the limit before the skb reaches
the subflow-level queue, as dropping an in-sequence already acked skb
would break the stream.
This is not a complete fix for the stall issue, as the drop strategy
needs refinements that will come in the next patches.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
v<n> -. v<n+1>:
- refine mptcp_over_limit() to check separately backlog and rcvbuf
- do not drop rst (with data)
---
net/mptcp/mib.c | 2 ++
net/mptcp/mib.h | 2 ++
net/mptcp/options.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.c b/net/mptcp/mib.c
index f23fda0c55a7..ef65e2df709f 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.c
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static const struct snmp_mib mptcp_snmp_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("SimultConnectFallback", MPTCP_MIB_SIMULTCONNFALLBACK),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("FallbackFailed", MPTCP_MIB_FALLBACKFAILED),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("WinProbe", MPTCP_MIB_WINPROBE),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("BacklogDrop", MPTCP_MIB_BACKLOGDROP),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RcvPruned", MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED),
};
/* mptcp_mib_alloc - allocate percpu mib counters
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.h b/net/mptcp/mib.h
index 812218b5ed2b..9271205f682e 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.h
@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ enum linux_mptcp_mib_field {
MPTCP_MIB_SIMULTCONNFALLBACK, /* Simultaneous connect */
MPTCP_MIB_FALLBACKFAILED, /* Can't fallback due to msk status */
MPTCP_MIB_WINPROBE, /* MPTCP-level zero window probe */
+ MPTCP_MIB_BACKLOGDROP, /* Backlog over memory limit */
+ MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED, /* Dropped due to memory constraints */
__MPTCP_MIB_MAX
};
diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
index 1057d500577b..db3dcea652ee 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/options.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
@@ -1190,8 +1190,34 @@ static bool add_addr_hmac_valid(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
return hmac == mp_opt->ahmac;
}
-/* Return false in case of error (or subflow has been reset),
- * else return true.
+static bool mptcp_over_limit(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
+ const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ u32 rcvbuf = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf);
+
+ if (likely((u32)sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) <= rcvbuf &&
+ READ_ONCE(msk->backlog_len) <= rcvbuf))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Avoid silently dropping pure acks, fin, rst or already-acked segments. */
+ if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq ||
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & (TCPHDR_FIN | TCPHDR_RST) ||
+ !after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_nxt))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Dropped due to memory constraints, schedule an ack. */
+ inet_csk(ssk)->icsk_ack.pending |= ICSK_ACK_NOMEM | ICSK_ACK_NOW;
+ inet_csk_schedule_ack(ssk);
+
+ /* Plain TCP (fallback) and skb is dropped before the TCP recv queue. */
+ NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPRCVQDROP);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Return false when the caller must drop the packet, i.e. in case of error,
+ * subflow has been reset, or over memory limits.
*/
bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -1217,7 +1243,7 @@ bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
__mptcp_data_acked(subflow->conn);
mptcp_data_unlock(subflow->conn);
- return true;
+ return !mptcp_over_limit(subflow->conn, sk, skb);
}
mptcp_get_options(skb, &mp_opt);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 4099ca915f70..d2303711c337 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -387,6 +387,16 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
mptcp_borrow_fwdmem(sk, skb);
+ /* Can't drop packets for fallback socket this late, or the stream
+ * will break.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf)) &&
+ !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) {
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED);
+ mptcp_drop(sk, skb);
+ return false;
+ }
+
if (MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq == msk->ack_seq) {
/* in sequence */
msk->bytes_received += copy_len;
@@ -681,6 +691,7 @@ static void __mptcp_add_backlog(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
struct sock *ssk = skb->sk;
bool fragstolen;
+ u64 limit;
int delta;
if (unlikely(sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE)) {
@@ -688,6 +699,16 @@ static void __mptcp_add_backlog(struct sock *sk,
return;
}
+ /* Similar additional allowance as plain TCP. */
+ limit = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf);
+ limit += (limit >> 1) + 64 * 1024;
+ limit = min_t(u64, limit, UINT_MAX);
+ if (msk->backlog_len > limit && !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) {
+ __MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_BACKLOGDROP);
+ kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_SOCKET_BACKLOG);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* Try to coalesce with the last skb in our backlog */
if (!list_empty(&msk->backlog_list))
tail = list_last_entry(&msk->backlog_list, struct sk_buff, list);
@@ -759,7 +780,7 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
mptcp_init_skb(ssk, skb, offset, len);
- if (own_msk && sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) < sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
+ if (own_msk) {
mptcp_subflow_lend_fwdmem(subflow, skb);
ret |= __mptcp_move_skb(sk, skb);
} else {
@@ -2210,10 +2231,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk, struct list_head *skbs, u32 *delt
*delta = 0;
while (1) {
- /* If the msk recvbuf is full stop, don't drop */
- if (sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
- break;
-
prefetch(skb->next);
list_del(&skb->list);
*delta += skb->truesize;
@@ -2241,9 +2258,7 @@ static bool mptcp_can_spool_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct list_head *skbs)
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->backlog_unaccounted && sk->sk_socket &&
mem_cgroup_from_sk(sk));
- /* Don't spool the backlog if the rcvbuf is full. */
- if (list_empty(&msk->backlog_list) ||
- sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
+ if (list_empty(&msk->backlog_list))
return false;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(skbs);
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next 5/7] mptcp: enforce hard limit on backlog flushing
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 4/7] mptcp: explicitly drop over memory limits Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 16:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 6/7] mptcp: avoid code duplication in __mptcp_move_skb() Paolo Abeni
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Currently a wild producer could keep the backlog flushing operation
spinning for an unbound time.
Since the previous patch the amount of data present in the backlog is
hard-limited. Move the backlog len update at the end of the flush loop to
prevent it spinning forever.
Also, no need to splice back the remaining skbs list into the backlog, as
such list is always empty after each backlog processing loop.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 21 ++++++---------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index d2303711c337..df1801699cce 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2229,7 +2229,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk, struct list_head *skbs, u32 *delt
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
bool moved = false;
- *delta = 0;
while (1) {
prefetch(skb->next);
list_del(&skb->list);
@@ -2266,20 +2265,12 @@ static bool mptcp_can_spool_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct list_head *skbs)
return true;
}
-static void mptcp_backlog_spooled(struct sock *sk, u32 moved,
- struct list_head *skbs)
-{
- struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
-
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->backlog_len, msk->backlog_len - moved);
- list_splice(skbs, &msk->backlog_list);
-}
-
static bool mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
{
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
struct list_head skbs;
bool enqueued = false;
- u32 moved;
+ u32 moved = 0;
mptcp_data_lock(sk);
while (mptcp_can_spool_backlog(sk, &skbs)) {
@@ -2287,8 +2278,8 @@ static bool mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
enqueued |= __mptcp_move_skbs(sk, &skbs, &moved);
mptcp_data_lock(sk);
- mptcp_backlog_spooled(sk, moved, &skbs);
}
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->backlog_len, msk->backlog_len - moved);
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
if (enqueued && mptcp_epollin_ready(sk))
@@ -3729,12 +3720,12 @@ static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
__must_hold(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ u32 moved = 0;
for (;;) {
unsigned long flags = (msk->cb_flags & MPTCP_FLAGS_PROCESS_CTX_NEED);
struct list_head join_list, skbs;
bool spool_bl;
- u32 moved;
spool_bl = mptcp_can_spool_backlog(sk, &skbs);
if (!flags && !spool_bl)
@@ -3767,9 +3758,9 @@ static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
cond_resched();
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
- if (spool_bl)
- mptcp_backlog_spooled(sk, moved, &skbs);
}
+ if (moved)
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->backlog_len, msk->backlog_len - moved);
if (__test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_CLEAN_UNA, &msk->cb_flags))
__mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next 6/7] mptcp: avoid code duplication in __mptcp_move_skb()
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 5/7] mptcp: enforce hard limit on backlog flushing Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 16:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 7/7] mptcp: implemented OoO queue pruning Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 17:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure MPTCP CI
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Alike TCP, MPTCP handles in-sequence packets and partially overlapping
ones in a very similar way: we can use the same path to handle both,
avoiding some code duplication.
This will also make the next patch simpler.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index df1801699cce..1181d733bc4b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq == msk->ack_seq) {
/* in sequence */
+insert:
msk->bytes_received += copy_len;
WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_seq, msk->ack_seq + copy_len);
tail = skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
@@ -413,26 +414,20 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
return false;
}
- /* Completely old data? */
- if (!after64(MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, msk->ack_seq)) {
- MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_DUPDATA);
- mptcp_drop(sk, skb);
- return false;
+ /* Partial packet */
+ if (after64(MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, msk->ack_seq)) {
+ copy_len = MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - msk->ack_seq;
+ MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->offset += msk->ack_seq -
+ MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
+ MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq += msk->ack_seq -
+ MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
+ goto insert;
}
- /* Partial packet: map_seq < ack_seq < end_seq.
- * Skip the already-acked bytes and enqueue the new data.
- */
- copy_len = MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - msk->ack_seq;
- MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->offset += msk->ack_seq - MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
- MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq += msk->ack_seq -
- MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
- msk->bytes_received += copy_len;
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_seq, msk->ack_seq + copy_len);
-
- skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
- __skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
- return true;
+ /* Completely old data */
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_DUPDATA);
+ mptcp_drop(sk, skb);
+ return false;
}
static void mptcp_stop_rtx_timer(struct sock *sk)
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next 7/7] mptcp: implemented OoO queue pruning
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 6/7] mptcp: avoid code duplication in __mptcp_move_skb() Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 16:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-05 17:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure MPTCP CI
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-08-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
When moving incoming skbs in the msk receive queue and the latter
is above limits, prune it as needed quite alike what TCP is doing
at the subflow level. The main difference relies in the stop condition:
since MPTCP does not perform collapsing, it's better off dropping the
bare minimum to fit the (newer) incoming packet.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
v<n> -> v<n+1>:
- prune only for new data
- reorganize the code to follow more closely TCP
---
net/mptcp/mib.c | 1 +
net/mptcp/mib.h | 1 +
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.c b/net/mptcp/mib.c
index ef65e2df709f..2569385bab7c 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static const struct snmp_mib mptcp_snmp_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("WinProbe", MPTCP_MIB_WINPROBE),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("BacklogDrop", MPTCP_MIB_BACKLOGDROP),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RcvPruned", MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("OFOPruned", MPTCP_MIB_OFOPRUNED),
};
/* mptcp_mib_alloc - allocate percpu mib counters
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.h b/net/mptcp/mib.h
index 9271205f682e..3a3425e258a7 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.h
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ enum linux_mptcp_mib_field {
MPTCP_MIB_WINPROBE, /* MPTCP-level zero window probe */
MPTCP_MIB_BACKLOGDROP, /* Backlog over memory limit */
MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED, /* Dropped due to memory constraints */
+ MPTCP_MIB_OFOPRUNED, /* MPTCP-level OoO queue pruned */
__MPTCP_MIB_MAX
};
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 1181d733bc4b..fa41a8c33dad 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -242,6 +242,65 @@ static bool mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk, u32 newval)
return false;
}
+/* "Inspired" from the TCP version; main difference: stop as soon as the MPTCP
+ * socket is under memory limit.
+ */
+static void mptcp_prune_ofo_queue(struct sock *sk,
+ const struct sk_buff *in_skb)
+{
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ struct rb_node *node, *prev;
+ bool pruned = false;
+ u64 mem;
+
+ if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&msk->out_of_order_queue))
+ return;
+
+ node = &msk->ooo_last_skb->rbnode;
+
+ do {
+ struct sk_buff *skb = rb_to_skb(node);
+
+ /* Stop pruning if the incoming skb would land in OoO tail. */
+ if (after64(MPTCP_SKB_CB(in_skb)->map_seq,
+ MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq))
+ break;
+
+ pruned = true;
+ prev = rb_prev(node);
+ rb_erase(node, &msk->out_of_order_queue);
+ mptcp_drop(sk, skb);
+ msk->ooo_last_skb = rb_to_skb(prev);
+
+ mem = (unsigned int)sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk);
+ if (mem <= sk->sk_rcvbuf)
+ break;
+
+ node = prev;
+ } while (node);
+
+ if (pruned)
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_OFOPRUNED);
+}
+
+/* The stack can't drop packets for fallback socket at the msk level, or the
+ * stream will break.
+ */
+static bool mptcp_can_ingest(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return unlikely(sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) <= READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf)) ||
+ __mptcp_check_fallback(mptcp_sk(sk));
+}
+
+static bool mptcp_try_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ if (!mptcp_can_ingest(sk)) {
+ mptcp_prune_ofo_queue(sk, skb);
+ return mptcp_can_ingest(sk);
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
/* "inspired" by tcp_data_queue_ofo(), main differences:
* - use mptcp seqs
* - don't cope with sacks
@@ -253,6 +312,12 @@ static void mptcp_data_queue_ofo(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *skb)
u64 seq, end_seq, max_seq;
struct sk_buff *skb1;
+ if (!mptcp_try_rmem_schedule(sk, skb)) {
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED);
+ mptcp_drop(sk, skb);
+ return;
+ }
+
seq = MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
end_seq = MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
max_seq = atomic64_read(&msk->rcv_wnd_sent);
@@ -387,19 +452,15 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
mptcp_borrow_fwdmem(sk, skb);
- /* Can't drop packets for fallback socket this late, or the stream
- * will break.
- */
- if (unlikely(sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf)) &&
- !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) {
- MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED);
- mptcp_drop(sk, skb);
- return false;
- }
-
if (MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq == msk->ack_seq) {
/* in sequence */
insert:
+ if (!mptcp_try_rmem_schedule(sk, skb)) {
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED);
+ mptcp_drop(sk, skb);
+ return false;
+ }
+
msk->bytes_received += copy_len;
WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_seq, msk->ack_seq + copy_len);
tail = skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure
2026-08-05 15:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure Paolo Abeni
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-05 16:17 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 7/7] mptcp: implemented OoO queue pruning Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-08-05 17:30 ` MPTCP CI
2026-08-06 9:16 ` Geliang Tang
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2026-08-05 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Unstable: 3 failed test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp bpftest_test_progs-no_alu32_mptcp bpftest_test_progs_mptcp ⚠️
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/31026237379
Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/503660467176
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1140906
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-normal
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure
2026-08-05 17:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: address stall under memory pressure MPTCP CI
@ 2026-08-06 9:16 ` Geliang Tang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2026-08-06 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp, Paolo Abeni
On Wed, 2026-08-05 at 17:30 +0000, MPTCP CI wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
>
> Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
>
> - KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Unstable: 3 failed
> test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp bpftest_test_progs-
> no_alu32_mptcp bpftest_test_progs_mptcp ⚠️
Since mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale is removed in this series, it also
needs to be removed from BPF to keep the BPF tests passing. I just sent
two squash-to patches to fix this.
Thanks,
-Geliang
> - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
> - Task:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/31026237379
>
> Initiator: Patchew Applier
> Commits:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/503660467176
> Patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1140906
>
>
> If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same
> environment as
> the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
>
> $ cd [kernel source code]
> $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm
> -it \
> --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
> auto-normal
>
> For more details:
>
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
>
>
> Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done
> to have a
> stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is
> possible some
> reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not
> hesitate to
> help us improve that ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> MPTCP GH Action bot
> Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread