Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com
Subject: Re: mt7530: dsa_switch_parse_of() fails, causes probe code to run twice
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:53:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01fe9c85-f1e0-107a-6fb7-e643fb76544e@arinc9.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZDn1QabUsyZj6J0M@makrotopia.org>

On 15.04.2023 03:52, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 03:28:55AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>> On 15.04.2023 02:53, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:23:16AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>> On 15.04.2023 01:48, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 01:41:07AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>>>> Hey there,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been working on the MT7530 DSA subdriver. While doing some tests, I
>>>>>> realised mt7530_probe() runs twice. I moved enabling the regulators from
>>>>>> mt7530_setup() to mt7530_probe(). Enabling the regulators there ends up
>>>>>> with exception warnings on the first time. It works fine when
>>>>>> mt7530_probe() is run again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This should not be an expected behaviour, right? Any ideas how we can make
>>>>>> it work the first time?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you share the patch or work-in-progress tree which will allow me
>>>>> to reproduce this problem?
>>>>
>>>> I tested this on vanilla 6.3-rc6. There's just the diff below that is
>>>> applied. I encountered it on the standalone MT7530 on my Bananapi BPI-R2. I
>>>> haven't tried it on MCM MT7530 on MT7621 SoC yet.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It can of course be that regulator driver has not yet been loaded on
>>>>> the first run and -EPROBE_DEFER is returned in that case. Knowing the
>>>>> value of 'err' variable below would hence be valuable information.
>>>>
>>>> Regardless of enabling the regulator on either mt7530_probe() or
>>>> mt7530_setup(), dsa_switch_parse_of() always fails.
>>>
>>> So dsa_switch_parse_of() can return -EPROBE_DEFER if the ethernet
>>> driver responsible for the CPU port has not yet been loaded.
>>>
>>> See net/dsa/dsa.c (inside function dsa_port_parse_of):
>>> [...]
>>> 1232)                master = of_find_net_device_by_node(ethernet);
>>> 1233)                of_node_put(ethernet);
>>> 1234)                if (!master)
>>> 1235)                        return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Hence it would be important to include the value of 'err' in your
>>> debugging printf output, as -EPROBE_DEFER can be an expected and
>>> implicitely intended reality and nothing is wrong then.
>>
>> Thanks Daniel. I can't do more tests soon but this is probably what's going
>> on as the logs already indicate that the MediaTek ethernet driver was yet to
>> load.
>>
>> As acknowledged, since running the MT7530 DSA subdriver from scratch is
>> expected if the ethernet driver is not loaded yet, there's not really a
>> problem. Though the switch is reset twice in a short amount of time. I don't
>> think that's very great.
> 
> That's true, and we should try to avoid that.
> 
>>
>> The driver initialisation seems serialised (at least for the drivers built
>> into the kernel) as I tried sleeping for 5 seconds on mt7530_probe() but no
>> other driver was loaded in the meantime so I got the same behaviour.
>>
>> The regulator code will cause a long and nasty exception the first time.
>> Though there's nothing wrong as it does what it's supposed to do on the
>> second run. I'm not sure if that's negligible.
>>
>> Could we at least somehow make the MT7530 DSA subdriver wait until the
>> regulator driver is loaded?
> 
> I assume the regulator-related stackdump is unrelated, but caused by
> cpufreq changes, which had now been fixed by commit 0883426fd07e
> ("cpufreq: mediatek: Raise proc and sram max voltage for MT7622/7623").
> 
> If you are using v6.3-rc6 this commit is still missing there, but
> manually picking it from linux-next should fix it.

I did one better and just did the test on the current linux-next, I get 
exceptions that seem to be identical. I also made sure this commit was 
actually there.

> 
> Let me know if I can help with testing on my farm of MediaTek boards.
> I'm a bit nervous about fixing MT7531BE soon, so deciding if we move
> PLL activation to mt7530_probe() would be essential as it makes the
> fix much easier...

Can you test this branch on MT7531AE, MT7531BE and the switch on MT7988 
SoC? I just need to complete the patch logs, the code won't change much.

https://github.com/arinc9/linux/commits/for-netnext

I'm thinking if we can -EPROBE_DEFER right at the start of 
mt7530_probe(), it should prevent the reset code from running twice, and 
enabling the regulator will run without any exceptions.

I think I can just keep enabling the regulator on mt7530_setup() if I 
can't figure that out. On MT7623NI, the switch stops working after 35 
seconds with these logs. As long as the regulator is enabled before 
this, everything keeps working.

[   35.037200] vusb: disabling
[   35.040089] vmc: disabling
[   35.042856] vmch: disabling
[   35.045709] vgp1: disabling
[   35.049010] vcamaf: disabling

Arınç

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-15  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14 22:41 mt7530: dsa_switch_parse_of() fails, causes probe code to run twice Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-14 22:48 ` Daniel Golle
2023-04-14 23:23   ` Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-14 23:53     ` Daniel Golle
2023-04-15  0:28       ` Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-15  0:52         ` Daniel Golle
2023-04-15  7:53           ` Arınç ÜNAL [this message]
2023-04-15  9:43             ` Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-15 12:43             ` Daniel Golle
2023-04-15 13:19               ` Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-15 13:38                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-15 13:40                   ` Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-15 13:46                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-15 14:02                       ` Daniel Golle
2023-04-15 14:20                         ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-15 14:28                           ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-15 14:57                           ` Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-16  9:38                             ` Arınç ÜNAL
2023-04-16 11:57                               ` Daniel Golle
2023-04-15 10:12 ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01fe9c85-f1e0-107a-6fb7-e643fb76544e@arinc9.com \
    --to=arinc.unal@arinc9.com \
    --cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox