From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Giuliano Pochini <pochini@shiny.it>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Subject: Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here...
Date: 22 Apr 2004 09:22:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082640135.1059.93.camel@jzny.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040422102359.pochini@shiny.it>
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 04:23, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> Yes, but it is possible, expecially for long sessions.
In other words, 80% or more of internet traffic would not be affected
still using http1.0 would not be affected.
And for something like a huge download to just regular joe, this is more
of a nuisance assuming some kiddie has access between you and the
server.
OTOH, long lived BGP sessions are affected assuming you are going across
hostile path to your peer.
So whats all this ado about nothing? Local media made it appear we are
all about to die.
Is anyone working on some fix?
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-22 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-21 15:25 tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here Chris Friesen
2004-04-21 16:02 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-21 16:25 ` Chris Friesen
2004-04-21 17:03 ` Jörn Engel
2004-04-21 20:20 ` David S. Miller
2004-04-22 0:45 ` James Morris
2004-04-22 5:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-04-22 8:23 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-04-22 11:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-22 13:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-04-22 13:42 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-22 14:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-04-22 20:25 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-22 21:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-04-22 18:28 ` David S. Miller
2004-04-22 13:22 ` jamal [this message]
2004-04-22 13:46 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-04-22 14:27 ` jamal
2004-04-22 14:37 ` alex
2004-04-22 15:17 ` jamal
2004-04-22 15:27 ` alex
2004-04-22 17:38 ` Horst von Brand
2004-04-22 21:15 ` Florian Weimer
2004-04-22 15:42 ` Chris Friesen
2004-04-22 15:47 ` alex
2004-04-23 10:31 ` Florian Weimer
2004-04-22 13:58 ` Florian Weimer
2004-04-23 13:55 ` Florian Weimer
2004-04-23 14:15 ` alex
2004-04-23 14:25 ` jamal
2004-04-22 20:01 ` Ranjeet Shetye
2004-04-22 21:26 ` Sridhar Samudrala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082640135.1059.93.camel@jzny.localdomain \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=pochini@shiny.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox