public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:55:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275926151.2545.126.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275924638.2545.121.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 17:30 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 22:53 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> 
> > Hmm. I don't think it is correct.
> > 
> > Look at this code:
> > 
> > void xt_rateest_put(struct xt_rateest *est)
> > {
> >         mutex_lock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
> >         if (--est->refcnt == 0) {
> >                 hlist_del(&est->list);
> >                 gen_kill_estimator(&est->bstats, &est->rstats);
> >                 kfree(est);
> >         }
> >         mutex_unlock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
> > }
> > 
> > est will be released after gen_kill_estimator() returns. After est is
> > freed, there may still be some other CPUs running in the branch:
> >      if (bstats) {
> >          ....
> >      }
> > 
> 
> Oh well, I think I knew this from a previous attempt, but then I
> forgot :)
> 
> I'll provide an updated patch, so that no other attempt is tried next
> yer, thanks !
> 
> 

For your information, bug is already there before my patch.

So this est_lock is a wrong protection, in the sense its so convoluted
that nobody but you and me even noticed it was buggy in the first place.

(see commit 5d944c640b4 for a first patch)




  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-07 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07 14:32 [PATCH net-next-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 14:53 ` Changli Gao
2010-06-07 15:30   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 15:55     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-06-07 16:56       ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 17:18         ` [PATCH net-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  1:00           ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  4:30             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  4:57               ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  4:58             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  5:20               ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  5:39                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  9:39           ` [PATCH net-2.6 v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 11:33             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 11:55               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-11  5:54             ` David Miller
2010-06-08 12:15         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 12:27           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 12:40             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 19:29               ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 19:45                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 20:24                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 20:52                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 21:18                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  6:13                       ` pkt_sched: gen_estimator: more fuel for Jarek and Changli Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  6:51                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  7:36                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  8:14                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  9:40         ` [PATCH] pkt_sched: gen_kill_estimator() rcu fixes Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  9:56           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 10:41             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 12:09               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 12:50                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 13:05                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-12  1:39                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275926151.2545.126.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox