public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:39:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276076350.2442.90.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275931108.2545.168.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 19:18 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :


> [PATCH net-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock
> 
> gen_kill_estimator() / gen_new_estimator() is not always called with
> RTNL held.
> 
> net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c is one user of these API that do not hold
> RTNL, so random corruptions can occur between "tc" and "iptables"
> 
> Add a new fine grained lock instead of trying to use RTNL in xt_RATEEST


Here is v2 of patch, adding protection in gen_estimator_active() as
well.

[PATCH net-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock

gen_kill_estimator() / gen_new_estimator() is not always called with
RTNL held.

net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c is one user of these API that do not hold
RTNL, so random corruptions can occur between "tc" and "iptables".

Add a new fine grained lock instead of trying to use RTNL in netfilter.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/gen_estimator.c |   15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/gen_estimator.c b/net/core/gen_estimator.c
index cf8e703..785e527 100644
--- a/net/core/gen_estimator.c
+++ b/net/core/gen_estimator.c
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ static DEFINE_RWLOCK(est_lock);
 
 /* Protects against soft lockup during large deletion */
 static struct rb_root est_root = RB_ROOT;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(est_tree_lock);
 
 static void est_timer(unsigned long arg)
 {
@@ -201,7 +202,6 @@ struct gen_estimator *gen_find_node(const struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats
  *
  * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code.
  *
- * NOTE: Called under rtnl_mutex
  */
 int gen_new_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
 		      struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est,
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ int gen_new_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
 	est->last_packets = bstats->packets;
 	est->avpps = rate_est->pps<<10;
 
+	spin_lock(&est_tree_lock);
 	if (!elist[idx].timer.function) {
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&elist[idx].list);
 		setup_timer(&elist[idx].timer, est_timer, idx);
@@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ int gen_new_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
 
 	list_add_rcu(&est->list, &elist[idx].list);
 	gen_add_node(est);
+	spin_unlock(&est_tree_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -261,13 +263,13 @@ static void __gen_kill_estimator(struct rcu_head *head)
  *
  * Removes the rate estimator specified by &bstats and &rate_est.
  *
- * NOTE: Called under rtnl_mutex
  */
 void gen_kill_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
 			struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est)
 {
 	struct gen_estimator *e;
 
+	spin_lock(&est_tree_lock);
 	while ((e = gen_find_node(bstats, rate_est))) {
 		rb_erase(&e->node, &est_root);
 
@@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ void gen_kill_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
 		list_del_rcu(&e->list);
 		call_rcu(&e->e_rcu, __gen_kill_estimator);
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&est_tree_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(gen_kill_estimator);
 
@@ -312,8 +315,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gen_replace_estimator);
 bool gen_estimator_active(const struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
 			  const struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est)
 {
+	bool res;
+
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
 
-	return gen_find_node(bstats, rate_est) != NULL;
+	spin_lock(&est_tree_lock);
+	res = gen_find_node(bstats, rate_est) != NULL;
+	spin_unlock(&est_tree_lock);
+
+	return res;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(gen_estimator_active);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-09  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07 14:32 [PATCH net-next-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 14:53 ` Changli Gao
2010-06-07 15:30   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 15:55     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 16:56       ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 17:18         ` [PATCH net-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  1:00           ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  4:30             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  4:57               ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  4:58             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  5:20               ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  5:39                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  9:39           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-06-09 11:33             ` [PATCH net-2.6 v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 11:55               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-11  5:54             ` David Miller
2010-06-08 12:15         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 12:27           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 12:40             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 19:29               ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 19:45                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 20:24                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 20:52                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 21:18                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  6:13                       ` pkt_sched: gen_estimator: more fuel for Jarek and Changli Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  6:51                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  7:36                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  8:14                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  9:40         ` [PATCH] pkt_sched: gen_kill_estimator() rcu fixes Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  9:56           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 10:41             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 12:09               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 12:50                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 13:05                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-12  1:39                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1276076350.2442.90.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox