From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] tcp: plug dst leak in tcp_v6_conn_request()
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:35:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340606125.10893.4.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQykuAQcj_i5cZQphKnnoHaCPMd6xLBmq1ZSAeZs83z3tfw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 13:12 -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/166737/
>
> Yes, the patches in this series were generated as patches against the
> "net" tree (sorry for not indicating that).
>
> The dst leak on the v6 sysctl_tw_recycle code path (patches 2-5) seems
> like a pretty low priority, so I think we could simplify your plan
> even a little further... How about this as a plan: we could apply the
> first patch in the series (tcp: heed result of
> security_inet_conn_request() in tcp_v6_conn_request()) to the net tree
> now, and skip patches 2-5 for now. Once your pending synack work is in
> net-next, I can respin patches 2-5 for net-next. How does that sound?
>
It sounds good, thanks !
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-24 5:22 [PATCH 1/5] tcp: heed result of security_inet_conn_request() in tcp_v6_conn_request() Neal Cardwell
2012-06-24 5:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] tcp: fix inet6_csk_route_req() for link-local addresses Neal Cardwell
2012-06-24 7:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-24 5:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] tcp: pass fl6 to inet6_csk_route_req() Neal Cardwell
2012-06-24 5:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] tcp: use inet6_csk_route_req() in tcp_v6_send_synack() Neal Cardwell
2012-06-24 5:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] tcp: plug dst leak in tcp_v6_conn_request() Neal Cardwell
2012-06-24 6:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-24 7:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-24 17:12 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-06-25 6:35 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-06-25 23:06 ` David Miller
2012-06-24 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] tcp: heed result of security_inet_conn_request() " Eric Dumazet
2012-06-25 23:05 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340606125.10893.4.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox