From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: add 64bit rate estimators
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:37:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370461057.24311.296.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370458531.1918.3.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 19:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 22:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> >
> > struct gnet_stats_rate_est contains u32 fields, so the byte per second
> > field can wrap at 34360Mbit.
> >
> > Add a new gnet_stats_rate_est64 structure to get 64bit bps field, and
> > switch the kernel to use this structure natively.
> [...]
> > /**
> > + * struct gnet_stats_rate_est64 - rate estimator
> > + * @bps: current byte rate
> > + * @pps: current packet rate
> > + */
> > +struct gnet_stats_rate_est64 {
> > + __u64 bps;
> > + __u32 pps;
> > +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> [...]
>
> Using attribute packed (which should be written as __packed) forces the
> alignment of each member and the structure as a whole to be 1. For an
> architecture where unaligned access is expensive, gcc will make all
> reads and writes use byte operations.
>
> I think you have to add a dummy __u32 member instead.
Its exported to userland so __packed is not available. Or has this been
changed lately ?
This structure is only used in very slow path, in the rate estimator
thing, so the unaligned accesses are not a problem at all.
I made this choice to not increase sizeof(struct Qdisc) and the
alignments as well.
If you think there is an issue with userland, we could use a
gnet_stats_rate_est64_packed in kernel, and a gnet_stats_rate_est64 in
userland.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 5:00 [PATCH net-next] net_sched: add 64bit rate estimators Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 18:55 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-06-05 19:37 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-06-05 20:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-06-05 23:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 8:39 ` David Laight
2013-06-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2013-06-11 9:51 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1370461057.24311.296.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox