* [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
@ 2026-04-28 17:51 Jori Koolstra
2026-04-28 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] " Jori Koolstra
2026-04-28 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftest: Add tests for useful " Jori Koolstra
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jori Koolstra @ 2026-04-28 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Jan Kara, Eric Dumazet,
Kuniyuki Iwashima, Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn,
David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jens Axboe, Kees Cook
Cc: Simon Horman, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry, Jeff Layton,
Jori Koolstra, Oleg Nesterov, Andrei Vagin, Pavel Tikhomirov,
Mateusz Guzik, Joel Granados, Charlie Mirabile, Aleksa Sarai,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netdev, io-uring
Right now if some LSM such as Smack denies an AF_UNIX socket peer to
receive an SCM_RIGHTS fd the SCM_RIGHTS fd array will be cut short at
that point, and MSG_CTRUNC is set on return of recvmsg(). This is
highly problematic behaviour, because it leaves the receiver
wondering what happened. As per man page MSG_CTRUNC is supposed to
indicate that the control buffer was sized too short, but suddenly
a permission error might result in the exact same flag being set.
Moreover, the receiver has no chance to determine how many fds got
originally sent and how many were suppressed.[1]
Add two MSG_* flags:
- MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL is set whenever any file is rejected by the LSM
during recvmsg(2) of SCM_RIGHTS fds.
- If MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER is passed as a flag to recvmsg(), the SCM_RIGHTS
fd array is always passed in its full original size. However, any
files rejected by the LSM are replaced in this array with -EPERM
instead of an assigned fd, while keeping the original order. If the
flag is not set, the original truncate behavior is used.
I am putting this out for RFC for two reasons:
1) The MSG_* space is quite limited. We can do without MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL
if needed.
2) Does userspace ever do anything else than bail out if MSG_CTRUNC is
found set? If not, we could maybe also get rid of MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER
and just make this the default behavior.
[1]: https://github.com/uapi-group/kernel-features#useful-handling-of-lsm-denials-on-scm_rights
Jori Koolstra (2):
net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
selftest: Add tests for useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
fs/file.c | 21 +-
include/linux/file.h | 4 +-
include/linux/socket.h | 3 +
include/net/scm.h | 8 +-
io_uring/openclose.c | 2 +-
kernel/pid.c | 2 +-
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
net/compat.c | 7 +-
net/core/scm.c | 11 +-
.../net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/helper.h | 37 ++++
.../net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/receiver.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++
.../net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/sender.c | 126 ++++++++++++
.../lsm_blocking/test_scm_rights_smack.sh | 172 ++++++++++++++++
13 files changed, 563 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/helper.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/receiver.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/sender.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/test_scm_rights_smack.sh
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
2026-04-28 17:51 [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS Jori Koolstra
@ 2026-04-28 17:51 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-04-30 2:04 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-04-28 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftest: Add tests for useful " Jori Koolstra
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jori Koolstra @ 2026-04-28 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Jan Kara, Eric Dumazet,
Kuniyuki Iwashima, Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn,
David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jens Axboe, Kees Cook
Cc: Simon Horman, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry, Jeff Layton,
Jori Koolstra, Oleg Nesterov, Andrei Vagin, Pavel Tikhomirov,
Mateusz Guzik, Joel Granados, Charlie Mirabile, Aleksa Sarai,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netdev, io-uring
Right now if some LSM such as Smack denies an AF_UNIX socket peer to
receive an SCM_RIGHTS fd the SCM_RIGHTS fd array will be cut short at
that point, and MSG_CTRUNC is set on return of recvmsg(). This is
highly problematic behaviour, because it leaves the receiver
wondering what happened. As per man page MSG_CTRUNC is supposed to
indicate that the control buffer was sized too short, but suddenly
a permission error might result in the exact same flag being set.
Moreover, the receiver has no chance to determine how many fds got
originally sent and how many were suppressed.[1]
Add two MSG_* flags:
- MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL is set whenever any file is rejected by the LSM
during recvmsg() of SCM_RIGHTS fds.
- If MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER is passed as a flag to recvmsg(), the SCM_RIGHTS
fd array is always passed in its full original size. However, any
files rejected by the LSM are replaced in this array with -EPERM
instead of an assigned fd, while keeping the original order. If the
flag is not set, the original truncate behavior is used.
[1]: https://github.com/uapi-group/kernel-features#useful-handling-of-lsm-denials-on-scm_rights
Signed-off-by: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl>
---
fs/file.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
include/linux/file.h | 4 +++-
include/linux/socket.h | 3 +++
include/net/scm.h | 8 ++++----
io_uring/openclose.c | 2 +-
kernel/pid.c | 2 +-
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
net/compat.c | 7 ++++---
net/core/scm.c | 11 ++++++-----
9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 2c81c0b162d0..cc33a1e77049 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -1370,10 +1370,11 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
}
/**
- * receive_fd() - Install received file into file descriptor table
+ * receive_fd_msg() - Install received file into file descriptor table
* @file: struct file that was received from another process
* @ufd: __user pointer to write new fd number to
* @o_flags: the O_* flags to apply to the new fd entry
+ * @msg_flags: the MSG_* flags to set for recvmsg(2)
*
* Installs a received file into the file descriptor table, with appropriate
* checks and count updates. Optionally writes the fd number to userspace, if
@@ -1384,13 +1385,21 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
*
* Returns newly install fd or -ve on error.
*/
-int receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
+int receive_fd_msg(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags,
+ unsigned int *msg_flags)
{
int error;
error = security_file_receive(file);
- if (error)
+ if (error) {
+ if (msg_flags)
+ *msg_flags |= MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL;
+
+ if (ufd)
+ put_user(-EPERM, ufd);
+
return error;
+ }
FD_PREPARE(fdf, o_flags, file);
if (fdf.err)
@@ -1406,6 +1415,12 @@ int receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
__receive_sock(fd_prepare_file(fdf));
return fd_publish(fdf);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(receive_fd_msg);
+
+int receive_fd(struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags)
+{
+ return receive_fd_msg(file, NULL, o_flags, NULL);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(receive_fd);
int receive_fd_replace(int new_fd, struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags)
diff --git a/include/linux/file.h b/include/linux/file.h
index 27484b444d31..38f022d997a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/file.h
+++ b/include/linux/file.h
@@ -118,7 +118,9 @@ DEFINE_FREE(fput, struct file *, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) fput(_T))
extern void fd_install(unsigned int fd, struct file *file);
-int receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags);
+int receive_fd_msg(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags,
+ unsigned int *msg_flags);
+int receive_fd(struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags);
int receive_fd_replace(int new_fd, struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags);
diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
index ec4a0a025793..3809a8add2fc 100644
--- a/include/linux/socket.h
+++ b/include/linux/socket.h
@@ -342,6 +342,9 @@ struct ucred {
* plain text and require encryption
*/
+#define MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL 0x200000
+#define MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER 0x400000
+
#define MSG_SOCK_DEVMEM 0x2000000 /* Receive devmem skbs as cmsg */
#define MSG_ZEROCOPY 0x4000000 /* Use user data in kernel path */
#define MSG_SPLICE_PAGES 0x8000000 /* Splice the pages from the iterator in sendmsg() */
diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h
index c52519669349..983efa952c8e 100644
--- a/include/net/scm.h
+++ b/include/net/scm.h
@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ struct scm_cookie {
#endif
};
-void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm);
-void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm);
+void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags);
+void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags);
int __scm_send(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm);
void __scm_destroy(struct scm_cookie *scm);
struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl);
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ void scm_recv_unix(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
struct scm_cookie *scm, int flags);
static inline int scm_recv_one_fd(struct file *f, int __user *ufd,
- unsigned int flags)
+ unsigned int o_flags, unsigned int *msg_flags)
{
if (!ufd)
return -EFAULT;
- return receive_fd(f, ufd, flags);
+ return receive_fd_msg(f, ufd, o_flags, msg_flags);
}
#endif /* __LINUX_NET_SCM_H */
diff --git a/io_uring/openclose.c b/io_uring/openclose.c
index c71242915dad..1b6cb05b0e3d 100644
--- a/io_uring/openclose.c
+++ b/io_uring/openclose.c
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ int io_install_fixed_fd(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
int ret;
ifi = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_fixed_install);
- ret = receive_fd(req->file, NULL, ifi->o_flags);
+ ret = receive_fd(req->file, ifi->o_flags);
if (ret < 0)
req_set_fail(req);
io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index fd5c2d4aa349..62af6874192d 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int pidfd_getfd(struct pid *pid, int fd)
if (IS_ERR(file))
return PTR_ERR(file);
- ret = receive_fd(file, NULL, O_CLOEXEC);
+ ret = receive_fd(file, O_CLOEXEC);
fput(file);
return ret;
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 066909393c38..ad5ab16fe2b1 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static void seccomp_handle_addfd(struct seccomp_kaddfd *addfd, struct seccomp_kn
*/
list_del_init(&addfd->list);
if (!addfd->setfd)
- fd = receive_fd(addfd->file, NULL, addfd->flags);
+ fd = receive_fd(addfd->file, addfd->flags);
else
fd = receive_fd_replace(addfd->fd, addfd->file, addfd->flags);
addfd->ret = fd;
diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
index 2c9bd0edac99..056bce0927c4 100644
--- a/net/compat.c
+++ b/net/compat.c
@@ -287,18 +287,19 @@ static int scm_max_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg)
return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct compat_cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
}
-void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
+void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags)
{
struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cm =
(struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control_user;
unsigned int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
+ bool filter_rights = recv_flags & MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER;
int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds_compat(msg), scm->fp->count);
int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_COMPAT_DATA(cm);
int err = 0, i;
for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
- err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
- if (err < 0)
+ err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags, &msg->msg_flags);
+ if (err < 0 && !filter_rights)
break;
}
diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index eec13f50ecaf..035329645d8f 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -351,10 +351,11 @@ static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)
return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
}
-void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
+void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags)
{
struct cmsghdr __user *cm =
(__force struct cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control_user;
+ bool filter_rights = recv_flags & MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER;
unsigned int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds(msg), scm->fp->count);
int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_USER_DATA(cm);
@@ -365,13 +366,13 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
return;
if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT) {
- scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm);
+ scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm, recv_flags);
return;
}
for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
- err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
- if (err < 0)
+ err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags, &msg->msg_flags);
+ if (err < 0 && !filter_rights)
break;
}
@@ -524,7 +525,7 @@ static bool __scm_recv_common(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
scm_passec(sk, msg, scm);
if (scm->fp)
- scm_detach_fds(msg, scm);
+ scm_detach_fds(msg, scm, flags);
return true;
}
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftest: Add tests for useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
2026-04-28 17:51 [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS Jori Koolstra
2026-04-28 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] " Jori Koolstra
@ 2026-04-28 17:51 ` Jori Koolstra
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jori Koolstra @ 2026-04-28 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Jan Kara, Eric Dumazet,
Kuniyuki Iwashima, Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn,
David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jens Axboe, Kees Cook
Cc: Simon Horman, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry, Jeff Layton,
Jori Koolstra, Oleg Nesterov, Andrei Vagin, Pavel Tikhomirov,
Mateusz Guzik, Joel Granados, Charlie Mirabile, Aleksa Sarai,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netdev, io-uring
Tests SCM_RIGHTS fd passing using Smack LSM blocking in combination with
the MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER flag.
Signed-off-by: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl>
---
.../net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/helper.h | 37 ++++
.../net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/receiver.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++
.../net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/sender.c | 126 ++++++++++++
.../lsm_blocking/test_scm_rights_smack.sh | 172 ++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 522 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/helper.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/receiver.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/sender.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/test_scm_rights_smack.sh
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/helper.h b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/helper.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e827560ee78d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/helper.h
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+
+#define MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL 0x200000
+#define MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER 0x400000
+
+#define CMSG_IS_SCM_RIGHTS(cmsg) ({ \
+ typeof(cmsg) _cmsg = (cmsg); \
+ _cmsg && \
+ _cmsg->cmsg_level == SOL_SOCKET && \
+ _cmsg->cmsg_type == SCM_RIGHTS; \
+})
+
+#define MIN(a, b) ({ \
+ typeof(a) _a = (a); \
+ typeof(b) _b = (b); \
+ _a < _b ? _a : _b; \
+})
+
+#define MAX_FDS 10
+
+static inline int read_current_label(char *label, size_t size)
+{
+ int fd = open("/proc/self/attr/current", O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return fd;
+
+ ssize_t r = read(fd, label, size - 1);
+ close(fd);
+ if (r <= 0)
+ return r;
+
+ label[r] = '\0';
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/receiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/receiver.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f5af9dcddc22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/receiver.c
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+/*
+ * receiver.c - Receive a file descriptor over a Unix domain socket via SCM_RIGHTS
+ *
+ * Usage: ./receiver <socket_path>
+ *
+ * Listens on the given Unix socket path, accepts a connection, and
+ * attempts to receive file descriptors via SCM_RIGHTS. Reports
+ * whether the fds were delivered or blocked.
+ *
+ * Used for testing LSM (Smack) blocking of fd passing.
+ */
+
+#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <sys/un.h>
+#include <sys/xattr.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+
+#include "helper.h"
+
+#define RECV_LOG(fmt, ...) printf("receiver: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define RECV_ERR(fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, "receiver: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+static int recv_fds(int sock, int *fds)
+{
+ char buf[1];
+ char ctrl[CMSG_SPACE(MAX_FDS * sizeof(int))];
+
+ struct iovec iov = {
+ .iov_base = buf,
+ .iov_len = sizeof(buf),
+ };
+ struct msghdr msg = {
+ .msg_iov = &iov,
+ .msg_iovlen = 1,
+ .msg_control = ctrl,
+ .msg_controllen = sizeof(ctrl),
+ };
+
+ ssize_t bytes_read = recvmsg(sock, &msg, MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER);
+ if (bytes_read < 0) {
+ perror("receiver: recvmsg");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (bytes_read == 0) {
+ RECV_ERR("connection closed, no data received\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (msg.msg_flags & MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL)
+ RECV_LOG("MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL set - some fds were blocked by the LSM!\n");
+
+ struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
+ if (!CMSG_IS_SCM_RIGHTS(cmsg)) {
+ RECV_ERR("no SCM_RIGHTS in control message\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ int num_fd_slots = (cmsg->cmsg_len - CMSG_LEN(0)) / sizeof(int);
+ memcpy(fds, CMSG_DATA(cmsg), num_fd_slots * sizeof(int));
+
+ RECV_LOG("got %d fd slots:", num_fd_slots);
+ for (int i = 0; i < num_fd_slots ; i++)
+ printf(" %d", fds[i]);
+ putchar('\n');
+
+ return num_fd_slots;
+}
+
+static inline int print_current_label(void)
+{
+ char label[256];
+ if (!read_current_label(label, sizeof(label))) {
+ RECV_LOG("running with Smack label '%s'\n", label);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return -1;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ if (argc != 2) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <socket_path>\n", argv[0]);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (print_current_label()) {
+ RECV_ERR("cannot read process Smack label");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ int listen_sock = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+ if (listen_sock < 0) {
+ perror("receiver: socket");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ struct sockaddr_un addr = {};
+ addr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
+ strncpy(addr.sun_path, argv[1], sizeof(addr.sun_path) - 1);
+
+ /* Remove any stale socket file */
+ unlink(argv[1]);
+
+ if (bind(listen_sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)) < 0) {
+ perror("receiver: bind");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (listen(listen_sock, 1) < 0) {
+ perror("receiver: listen");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ RECV_LOG("listening on '%s'\n", argv[1]);
+
+ int conn_sock = accept(listen_sock, NULL, NULL);
+ if (conn_sock < 0) {
+ perror("receiver: accept");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ RECV_LOG("connection accepted\n");
+
+ /* Try to receive the fds */
+ int fds[MAX_FDS];
+ int num_fds = recv_fds(conn_sock, fds);
+ if (num_fds < 0)
+ goto out_sock;
+
+ /* Try to use the received fds -- read and print their contents */
+ RECV_LOG("attempting to read from received fds...\n");
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < num_fds; ++i) {
+ char readbuf[256];
+
+ if (fds[i] < 0) {
+ RECV_LOG("fd in position %i blocked\n", i);
+ continue;
+ } else if (fds[i] == 0) {
+ RECV_LOG("bad fd in position %i\n", i);
+ goto out_recv;
+ }
+
+ ssize_t n = read(fds[i], readbuf, sizeof(readbuf) - 1);
+ if (n < 0) {
+ perror("receiver: read from received fd");
+ goto out_recv;
+ }
+
+ readbuf[n] = '\0';
+ RECV_LOG("read %zd bytes from fd at position %i: '%s'\n", n, i, readbuf);
+ }
+
+ RECV_LOG("final result:\n");
+ for (int j = 0; j < num_fds; ++j) {
+ if (fds[j] < 0) {
+ printf("BLOCKED");
+ } else {
+ printf("PASSED");
+ close(fds[j]);
+ }
+ putchar(' ');
+ }
+
+ close(conn_sock);
+ close(listen_sock);
+ unlink(argv[1]);
+ return 0;
+
+out_recv:
+ for (int j = 0; j < num_fds; ++j) {
+ if (fds[j] > 0)
+ close(fds[j]);
+ }
+
+out_sock:
+ close(conn_sock);
+ close(listen_sock);
+ unlink(argv[1]);
+ return -1;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/sender.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/sender.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b1c76d23b8bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/sender.c
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+/*
+ * sender.c - Send file descriptors over a Unix domain socket via SCM_RIGHTS
+ *
+ * Usage: ./sender <socket_path> <file_to_send> [<file_to_send>...]
+ *
+ * Opens the specified files and sends their fds to a receiver connected
+ * on the given Unix socket path. Used for testing LSM blocking of fd
+ * passing.
+ */
+
+#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <sys/un.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+
+#include "helper.h"
+
+#define SEND_LOG(fmt, ...) fprintf(stdout, "sender: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define SEND_ERR(fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, "sender: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+static int send_fds(int sock, int *fds, int num_fds)
+{
+ if (num_fds > MAX_FDS)
+ return -1;
+
+ char buf[1] = { 'X' };
+ char ctrl[CMSG_SPACE(MAX_FDS * sizeof(int))] = { 0 };
+
+ struct iovec iov = {
+ .iov_base = buf,
+ .iov_len = sizeof(buf),
+ };
+ struct msghdr msg = {
+ .msg_iov = &iov,
+ .msg_iovlen = 1,
+ .msg_control = ctrl,
+ .msg_controllen = CMSG_SPACE(num_fds * sizeof(int)),
+ };
+
+ struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
+ cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET;
+ cmsg->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS;
+ cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(num_fds * sizeof(int));
+ memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cmsg), fds, num_fds * sizeof(int));
+
+ ssize_t bytes_send = sendmsg(sock, &msg, 0);
+ if (bytes_send < 0) {
+ perror("sender: sendmsg");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int print_current_label(void)
+{
+ char label[256];
+ if (!read_current_label(label, sizeof(label))) {
+ SEND_LOG("running with Smack label '%s'\n", label);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return -1;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ if (argc < 3 || argc > 2 + MAX_FDS) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <socket_path> <file_to_send> [<file_to_send>...]\\n",
+ argv[0]);
+ fprintf(stderr, "Up to a maximum of %d files", MAX_FDS);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (print_current_label()) {
+ SEND_ERR("cannot read process Smack label");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ int sock = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+ if (sock < 0) {
+ perror("sender: socket");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ struct sockaddr_un addr = {};
+ addr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
+ strncpy(addr.sun_path, argv[1], sizeof(addr.sun_path) - 1);
+
+ if (connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)) < 0) {
+ perror("sender: connect");
+ goto out_sock;
+ }
+
+ SEND_LOG("connected to '%s'\n", argv[1]);
+
+ int num_files = argc - 2;
+ int fds[MAX_FDS];
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < num_files; i++) {
+ fds[i] = open(argv[2 + i], O_RDONLY);
+ if (fds[i] < 0) {
+ perror("sender: open file");
+ goto out_opened;
+ }
+ SEND_LOG("opened '%s' as fd %d\n", argv[2 + i], fds[i]);
+ }
+
+ if (send_fds(sock, fds, num_files) < 0)
+ goto out_opened;
+
+ SEND_LOG("fds successfully sent:");
+ for (int j = 0; j < num_files; j++)
+ printf(" %d", fds[j]);
+ putchar('\n');
+
+out_opened:
+ for (int j = 0; j < i; j++)
+ close(fds[j]);
+out_sock:
+ close(sock);
+ return -1;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/test_scm_rights_smack.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/test_scm_rights_smack.sh
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..76fcfdd2cd4a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/lsm_blocking/test_scm_rights_smack.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#
+# test_scm_rights_smack.sh - Test SCM_RIGHTS fd passing using Smack LSM blocking
+#
+# Must be run as root on a kernel with Smack enabled (security=smack).
+# Requires: capsh (libcap), setfattr/getfattr (attr)
+#
+# We use the following Smack labels:
+# "Sender" - label for the sending process
+# "Receiver" - label for the receiving process
+# "SecretX" - labels for the files being passed
+#
+# Socket communication (Sender <-> Receiver) is always allowed.
+# The test controls whether Receiver can access "SecretX"-labeled fds.
+#
+
+
+readonly SOCK="/tmp/scm_test.sock"
+readonly TESTFILE1="/tmp/scm_test_secret_1"
+readonly TESTFILE2="/tmp/scm_test_secret_2"
+readonly SENDER="./sender"
+readonly RECEIVER="./receiver"
+
+set -e
+
+run_tests() {
+
+ preflight
+ setup
+
+ run_test "TEST 1" \
+ "Receiver should NOT have access to Secret1." \
+ "Receiver Secret1 ---
+Receiver Secret2 ---" \
+ "$TESTFILE1" \
+ "BLOCKED"
+
+ run_test "TEST 2" \
+ "Receiver should have access to Secret1." \
+ "Receiver Secret1 r--
+Receiver Secret2 ---" \
+ "$TESTFILE1" \
+ "PASSED"
+
+ run_test "TEST 3" \
+ "Receiver should have access to Secret2, but NOT Secret1." \
+ "Receiver Secret1 ---
+Receiver Secret2 r--" \
+ "$TESTFILE1 $TESTFILE2" \
+ "BLOCKED PASSED"
+}
+
+run_test() {
+ local name="$1"
+ local description="$2"
+ local rules="$3"
+ local files="$4"
+ local expected="$5"
+
+ echo ""
+ echo "$name: $description"
+ echo "Rules:"
+ echo "$rules"
+ echo "Expected: $expected"
+ echo ""
+
+ while IFS= read -r rule; do
+ [ -n "$rule" ] && echo "$rule" > /sys/fs/smackfs/load2
+ done <<< "$rules"
+
+ local output status last_line
+ output=$(send_fds "$SOCK" $files)
+ status=$?
+ echo "$output"
+ last_line=$(echo "$output" | tail -n 1 | xargs)
+
+ if [ "$status" -ne 0 ]; then
+ echo "TEST FAILED: receiver returned $status"
+ return 1
+ fi
+
+ if [[ "$last_line" == "$expected" ]]; then
+ echo "TEST PASSED: outcome was $expected as expected"
+ return 0
+ else
+ echo "TEST FAILED: expected $expected, got '$last_line'"
+ return 1
+ fi
+}
+
+setup() {
+
+ printf "Secret 1" > "$TESTFILE1"
+ printf "Secret 2" > "$TESTFILE2"
+
+ setfattr -n security.SMACK64 -v "Secret1" "$TESTFILE1"
+ setfattr -n security.SMACK64 -v "Secret2" "$TESTFILE2"
+ setfattr -n security.SMACK64 -v "Tmp" /tmp
+
+ echo "Sender Receiver -w-" > /sys/fs/smackfs/load2
+ echo "Receiver Sender -w-" > /sys/fs/smackfs/load2
+ echo "Sender Tmp rwx" > /sys/fs/smackfs/load2
+ echo "Receiver Tmp rwx" > /sys/fs/smackfs/load2
+ echo "Sender Secret1 r--" > /sys/fs/smackfs/load2
+ echo "Sender Secret2 r--" > /sys/fs/smackfs/load2
+}
+
+send_fds() {
+
+ local sk="$1"
+ shift
+ local files="$*"
+
+ (
+ echo "Receiver" > /proc/self/attr/current
+ exec capsh --drop=cap_mac_override,cap_mac_admin -- -c "$RECEIVER $sk"
+ ) &
+ local recv_pid=$!
+ sleep 1
+
+ (
+ echo "Sender" > /proc/self/attr/current
+ exec capsh --drop=cap_mac_override,cap_mac_admin -- -c "$SENDER $sk $files"
+ ) || true
+
+ local recv_status=0
+ wait "$recv_pid" || recv_status=$?
+
+ if [ "$recv_status" -ne 0 ]; then
+ echo "receiver exited with $recv_status"
+ fi
+ return "$recv_status"
+}
+
+preflight() {
+
+ if [ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ]; then
+ echo "ERROR: must be run as root"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
+ if ! grep -q smack /sys/kernel/security/lsm 2>/dev/null; then
+ echo "ERROR: Smack is not active"
+ echo " Check: cat /sys/kernel/security/lsm"
+ echo " Boot with: security=smack"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
+ if ! mountpoint -q /sys/fs/smackfs 2>/dev/null; then
+ echo "Mounting smackfs..."
+ mount -t smackfs smackfs /sys/fs/smackfs
+ fi
+
+ if ! command -v capsh &>/dev/null; then
+ echo "ERROR: capsh not found (install libcap)"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
+ # Build the test programs if needed
+ if [ ! -x "$SENDER" ]; then
+ echo "Building sender..."
+ gcc -Wall -o sender sender.c
+ fi
+ if [ ! -x "$RECEIVER" ]; then
+ echo "Building receiver..."
+ gcc -Wall -o receiver receiver.c
+ fi
+
+}
+
+run_tests
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
2026-04-28 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] " Jori Koolstra
@ 2026-04-30 2:04 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-01 15:34 ` Jori Koolstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2026-04-30 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jori Koolstra
Cc: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Jan Kara, Eric Dumazet,
Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
Jens Axboe, Kees Cook, Simon Horman, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry,
Jeff Layton, Oleg Nesterov, Andrei Vagin, Pavel Tikhomirov,
Mateusz Guzik, Joel Granados, Charlie Mirabile, Aleksa Sarai,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netdev, io-uring
On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:51 AM Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> Right now if some LSM such as Smack denies an AF_UNIX socket peer to
> receive an SCM_RIGHTS fd the SCM_RIGHTS fd array will be cut short at
> that point, and MSG_CTRUNC is set on return of recvmsg(). This is
> highly problematic behaviour, because it leaves the receiver
> wondering what happened. As per man page MSG_CTRUNC is supposed to
> indicate that the control buffer was sized too short, but suddenly
> a permission error might result in the exact same flag being set.
> Moreover, the receiver has no chance to determine how many fds got
> originally sent and how many were suppressed.[1]
>
> Add two MSG_* flags:
Since we only have 5 bits remaining for future extension,
we need to consider the use case a bit more carefully.
> - MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL is set whenever any file is rejected by the LSM
> during recvmsg() of SCM_RIGHTS fds.
Is this really needed ?
Even if the fd array is truncated, the application will traverse
the array anyway since it has some fds already installed (to
clean up in case of MSG_CTRUNC ?).
Then, it will find the -EPERM entry.
I assume no one uses MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL without
MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER.
> - If MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER is passed as a flag to recvmsg(), the SCM_RIGHTS
Does this flag need per-recvmsg() granularity ?
If the application does not welcome the truncated fd array,
it would have passed MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER to every
recvmsg(), no ?
( and I feel _FILTER sounds like "please do filtering (truncase)".
Maybe _NOTRUNC ? )
> fd array is always passed in its full original size. However, any
> files rejected by the LSM are replaced in this array with -EPERM
> instead of an assigned fd, while keeping the original order. If the
> flag is not set, the original truncate behavior is used.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/uapi-group/kernel-features#useful-handling-of-lsm-denials-on-scm_rights
>
> Signed-off-by: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl>
> ---
> fs/file.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/file.h | 4 +++-
> include/linux/socket.h | 3 +++
> include/net/scm.h | 8 ++++----
> io_uring/openclose.c | 2 +-
> kernel/pid.c | 2 +-
> kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
> net/compat.c | 7 ++++---
> net/core/scm.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 2c81c0b162d0..cc33a1e77049 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -1370,10 +1370,11 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
> }
>
> /**
> - * receive_fd() - Install received file into file descriptor table
> + * receive_fd_msg() - Install received file into file descriptor table
> * @file: struct file that was received from another process
> * @ufd: __user pointer to write new fd number to
> * @o_flags: the O_* flags to apply to the new fd entry
> + * @msg_flags: the MSG_* flags to set for recvmsg(2)
> *
> * Installs a received file into the file descriptor table, with appropriate
> * checks and count updates. Optionally writes the fd number to userspace, if
> @@ -1384,13 +1385,21 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
> *
> * Returns newly install fd or -ve on error.
> */
> -int receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
> +int receive_fd_msg(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags,
> + unsigned int *msg_flags)
> {
> int error;
>
> error = security_file_receive(file);
> - if (error)
> + if (error) {
> + if (msg_flags)
> + *msg_flags |= MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL;
> +
> + if (ufd)
> + put_user(-EPERM, ufd);
> +
> return error;
> + }
>
> FD_PREPARE(fdf, o_flags, file);
> if (fdf.err)
> @@ -1406,6 +1415,12 @@ int receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
> __receive_sock(fd_prepare_file(fdf));
> return fd_publish(fdf);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(receive_fd_msg);
> +
> +int receive_fd(struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags)
> +{
> + return receive_fd_msg(file, NULL, o_flags, NULL);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(receive_fd);
>
> int receive_fd_replace(int new_fd, struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags)
> diff --git a/include/linux/file.h b/include/linux/file.h
> index 27484b444d31..38f022d997a6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/file.h
> +++ b/include/linux/file.h
> @@ -118,7 +118,9 @@ DEFINE_FREE(fput, struct file *, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) fput(_T))
>
> extern void fd_install(unsigned int fd, struct file *file);
>
> -int receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags);
> +int receive_fd_msg(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags,
> + unsigned int *msg_flags);
> +int receive_fd(struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags);
>
> int receive_fd_replace(int new_fd, struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
> index ec4a0a025793..3809a8add2fc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/socket.h
> +++ b/include/linux/socket.h
> @@ -342,6 +342,9 @@ struct ucred {
> * plain text and require encryption
> */
>
> +#define MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL 0x200000
> +#define MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER 0x400000
> +
> #define MSG_SOCK_DEVMEM 0x2000000 /* Receive devmem skbs as cmsg */
> #define MSG_ZEROCOPY 0x4000000 /* Use user data in kernel path */
> #define MSG_SPLICE_PAGES 0x8000000 /* Splice the pages from the iterator in sendmsg() */
> diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h
> index c52519669349..983efa952c8e 100644
> --- a/include/net/scm.h
> +++ b/include/net/scm.h
> @@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ struct scm_cookie {
> #endif
> };
>
> -void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm);
> -void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm);
> +void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags);
> +void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags);
> int __scm_send(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm);
> void __scm_destroy(struct scm_cookie *scm);
> struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl);
> @@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ void scm_recv_unix(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> struct scm_cookie *scm, int flags);
>
> static inline int scm_recv_one_fd(struct file *f, int __user *ufd,
> - unsigned int flags)
> + unsigned int o_flags, unsigned int *msg_flags)
> {
> if (!ufd)
> return -EFAULT;
> - return receive_fd(f, ufd, flags);
> + return receive_fd_msg(f, ufd, o_flags, msg_flags);
> }
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_NET_SCM_H */
> diff --git a/io_uring/openclose.c b/io_uring/openclose.c
> index c71242915dad..1b6cb05b0e3d 100644
> --- a/io_uring/openclose.c
> +++ b/io_uring/openclose.c
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ int io_install_fixed_fd(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> int ret;
>
> ifi = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_fixed_install);
> - ret = receive_fd(req->file, NULL, ifi->o_flags);
> + ret = receive_fd(req->file, ifi->o_flags);
> if (ret < 0)
> req_set_fail(req);
> io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
> diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> index fd5c2d4aa349..62af6874192d 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int pidfd_getfd(struct pid *pid, int fd)
> if (IS_ERR(file))
> return PTR_ERR(file);
>
> - ret = receive_fd(file, NULL, O_CLOEXEC);
> + ret = receive_fd(file, O_CLOEXEC);
> fput(file);
>
> return ret;
> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> index 066909393c38..ad5ab16fe2b1 100644
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static void seccomp_handle_addfd(struct seccomp_kaddfd *addfd, struct seccomp_kn
> */
> list_del_init(&addfd->list);
> if (!addfd->setfd)
> - fd = receive_fd(addfd->file, NULL, addfd->flags);
> + fd = receive_fd(addfd->file, addfd->flags);
> else
> fd = receive_fd_replace(addfd->fd, addfd->file, addfd->flags);
> addfd->ret = fd;
> diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
> index 2c9bd0edac99..056bce0927c4 100644
> --- a/net/compat.c
> +++ b/net/compat.c
> @@ -287,18 +287,19 @@ static int scm_max_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg)
> return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct compat_cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
> }
>
> -void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
> +void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags)
> {
> struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cm =
> (struct compat_cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control_user;
> unsigned int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
> + bool filter_rights = recv_flags & MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER;
> int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds_compat(msg), scm->fp->count);
> int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_COMPAT_DATA(cm);
> int err = 0, i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
> - err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
> - if (err < 0)
> + err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags, &msg->msg_flags);
> + if (err < 0 && !filter_rights)
> break;
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
> index eec13f50ecaf..035329645d8f 100644
> --- a/net/core/scm.c
> +++ b/net/core/scm.c
> @@ -351,10 +351,11 @@ static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)
> return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
> }
>
> -void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
> +void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm, int recv_flags)
> {
> struct cmsghdr __user *cm =
> (__force struct cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control_user;
> + bool filter_rights = recv_flags & MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER;
> unsigned int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
> int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds(msg), scm->fp->count);
> int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_USER_DATA(cm);
> @@ -365,13 +366,13 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
> return;
>
> if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT) {
> - scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm);
> + scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm, recv_flags);
> return;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
> - err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
> - if (err < 0)
> + err = scm_recv_one_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags, &msg->msg_flags);
> + if (err < 0 && !filter_rights)
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -524,7 +525,7 @@ static bool __scm_recv_common(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> scm_passec(sk, msg, scm);
>
> if (scm->fp)
> - scm_detach_fds(msg, scm);
> + scm_detach_fds(msg, scm, flags);
>
> return true;
> }
> --
> 2.54.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
2026-04-30 2:04 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2026-05-01 15:34 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-05-02 1:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jori Koolstra @ 2026-05-01 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima
Cc: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Jan Kara, Eric Dumazet,
Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
Jens Axboe, Kees Cook, Simon Horman, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry,
Jeff Layton, Oleg Nesterov, Andrei Vagin, Pavel Tikhomirov,
Mateusz Guzik, Joel Granados, Charlie Mirabile, Aleksa Sarai,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netdev, io-uring
> Op 30-04-2026 04:04 CEST schreef Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:51 AM Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Right now if some LSM such as Smack denies an AF_UNIX socket peer to
> > receive an SCM_RIGHTS fd the SCM_RIGHTS fd array will be cut short at
> > that point, and MSG_CTRUNC is set on return of recvmsg(). This is
> > highly problematic behaviour, because it leaves the receiver
> > wondering what happened. As per man page MSG_CTRUNC is supposed to
> > indicate that the control buffer was sized too short, but suddenly
> > a permission error might result in the exact same flag being set.
> > Moreover, the receiver has no chance to determine how many fds got
> > originally sent and how many were suppressed.[1]
> >
> > Add two MSG_* flags:
>
> Since we only have 5 bits remaining for future extension,
> we need to consider the use case a bit more carefully.
>
Right. Since it wasn't a lot of work I implemented it exactly as the request
was made from userspace, and then discuss it from there. By the way, I suppose
nothing can be done about that small flag space?
>
> > - MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL is set whenever any file is rejected by the LSM
> > during recvmsg() of SCM_RIGHTS fds.
>
> Is this really needed ?
>
> Even if the fd array is truncated, the application will traverse
> the array anyway since it has some fds already installed (to
> clean up in case of MSG_CTRUNC ?).
>
> Then, it will find the -EPERM entry.
>
> I assume no one uses MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL without
> MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER.
>
I guess that is a fair assumption to make. We can certainly do without
MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL if saving flags is important. I also suggested that
we may see whether we can make MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER the default behavior.
In the mean time I've found grep.app, and it turns out the answer is no.
Apparently almost no one checks even for the truncation flag (mostly 1 fd
is passed and then it is check the cmsg lenght). But cpython has this for
instance:
/* Close all descriptors coming from SCM_RIGHTS, so they don't leak. */
for (cmsgh = ((msg.msg_controllen > 0) ? CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg) : NULL);
cmsgh != NULL; cmsgh = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmsgh)) {
cmsg_status = get_cmsg_data_len(&msg, cmsgh, &cmsgdatalen);
if (cmsg_status < 0)
break;
if (cmsgh->cmsg_level == SOL_SOCKET &&
cmsgh->cmsg_type == SCM_RIGHTS) {
size_t numfds;
int *fdp;
numfds = cmsgdatalen / sizeof(int);
fdp = (int *)CMSG_DATA(cmsgh);
while (numfds-- > 0)
close(*fdp++);
}
if (cmsg_status != 0)
break;
}
>
> > - If MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER is passed as a flag to recvmsg(), the SCM_RIGHTS
>
> Does this flag need per-recvmsg() granularity ?
>
Perhaps not. What would be the alternative? A fcntl option for the socket fd?
> If the application does not welcome the truncated fd array,
> it would have passed MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER to every
> recvmsg(), no ?
>
Correct.
Thanks,
Jori.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
2026-05-01 15:34 ` Jori Koolstra
@ 2026-05-02 1:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-04 17:43 ` Jori Koolstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2026-05-02 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jori Koolstra
Cc: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Jan Kara, Eric Dumazet,
Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
Jens Axboe, Kees Cook, Simon Horman, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry,
Jeff Layton, Oleg Nesterov, Andrei Vagin, Pavel Tikhomirov,
Mateusz Guzik, Joel Granados, Charlie Mirabile, Aleksa Sarai,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netdev, io-uring
On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 8:34 AM Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>
> > Op 30-04-2026 04:04 CEST schreef Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:51 AM Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > > Right now if some LSM such as Smack denies an AF_UNIX socket peer to
> > > receive an SCM_RIGHTS fd the SCM_RIGHTS fd array will be cut short at
> > > that point, and MSG_CTRUNC is set on return of recvmsg(). This is
> > > highly problematic behaviour, because it leaves the receiver
> > > wondering what happened. As per man page MSG_CTRUNC is supposed to
> > > indicate that the control buffer was sized too short, but suddenly
> > > a permission error might result in the exact same flag being set.
> > > Moreover, the receiver has no chance to determine how many fds got
> > > originally sent and how many were suppressed.[1]
> > >
> > > Add two MSG_* flags:
> >
> > Since we only have 5 bits remaining for future extension,
> > we need to consider the use case a bit more carefully.
> >
>
> Right. Since it wasn't a lot of work I implemented it exactly as the request
> was made from userspace, and then discuss it from there. By the way, I suppose
> nothing can be done about that small flag space?
We could reuse an existing flag (e.g. MSG_FIN, MSG_RST)
if we were confident enough that the userspace does not use
the flag for a specific socket type.
Another option is to add another syscall, recvmsg2.
>
> >
> > > - MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL is set whenever any file is rejected by the LSM
> > > during recvmsg() of SCM_RIGHTS fds.
> >
> > Is this really needed ?
> >
> > Even if the fd array is truncated, the application will traverse
> > the array anyway since it has some fds already installed (to
> > clean up in case of MSG_CTRUNC ?).
> >
> > Then, it will find the -EPERM entry.
> >
> > I assume no one uses MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL without
> > MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER.
> >
>
> I guess that is a fair assumption to make. We can certainly do without
> MSG_RIGHTS_DENIAL if saving flags is important. I also suggested that
> we may see whether we can make MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER the default behavior.
> In the mean time I've found grep.app, and it turns out the answer is no.
> Apparently almost no one checks even for the truncation flag (mostly 1 fd
> is passed and then it is check the cmsg lenght). But cpython has this for
> instance:
>
> /* Close all descriptors coming from SCM_RIGHTS, so they don't leak. */
> for (cmsgh = ((msg.msg_controllen > 0) ? CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg) : NULL);
> cmsgh != NULL; cmsgh = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmsgh)) {
> cmsg_status = get_cmsg_data_len(&msg, cmsgh, &cmsgdatalen);
> if (cmsg_status < 0)
> break;
> if (cmsgh->cmsg_level == SOL_SOCKET &&
> cmsgh->cmsg_type == SCM_RIGHTS) {
> size_t numfds;
> int *fdp;
> numfds = cmsgdatalen / sizeof(int);
> fdp = (int *)CMSG_DATA(cmsgh);
> while (numfds-- > 0)
> close(*fdp++);
> }
> if (cmsg_status != 0)
> break;
> }
>
> >
> > > - If MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER is passed as a flag to recvmsg(), the SCM_RIGHTS
> >
> > Does this flag need per-recvmsg() granularity ?
> >
>
> Perhaps not. What would be the alternative? A fcntl option for the socket fd?
I'd add a new socket option like
setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_RIGHTS_TRUNC, &(int){0}, sizeof(int));
>
> > If the application does not welcome the truncated fd array,
> > it would have passed MSG_RIGHTS_FILTER to every
> > recvmsg(), no ?
> >
>
> Correct.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jori.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
2026-05-02 1:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2026-05-04 17:43 ` Jori Koolstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jori Koolstra @ 2026-05-04 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima
Cc: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Jan Kara, Eric Dumazet,
Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
Jens Axboe, Kees Cook, Simon Horman, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry,
Jeff Layton, Oleg Nesterov, Andrei Vagin, Pavel Tikhomirov,
Mateusz Guzik, Joel Granados, Charlie Mirabile, Aleksa Sarai,
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netdev, io-uring
> Op 02-05-2026 03:24 CEST schreef Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>:
>
> > >
> > > Does this flag need per-recvmsg() granularity ?
> > >
> >
> > Perhaps not. What would be the alternative? A fcntl option for the socket fd?
>
> I'd add a new socket option like
>
> setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_RIGHTS_TRUNC, &(int){0}, sizeof(int));
>
>
I think this is reasonable suggestion (and better than using the MSG_ flags).
Let's just let this sit for a few days to see if anyone else has suggestions/
objections.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-04 17:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-28 17:51 [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: af_unix: Useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS Jori Koolstra
2026-04-28 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] " Jori Koolstra
2026-04-30 2:04 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-01 15:34 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-05-02 1:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-04 17:43 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-04-28 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftest: Add tests for useful " Jori Koolstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox