[PATCH net v2] net: ethtool: fix missing closing paren in rings_reply_size()

[PATCH net v2] net: ethtool: fix missing closing paren in rings_reply_size()

[Tao Cui]

sizeof(u32) on the _RINGS_CQE_SIZE line is missing its closing
parenthesis, causing nla_total_size() to absorb the subsequent
_TX_PUSH and _RX_PUSH entries. The resulting size estimate
happens to be numerically identical due to NLA alignment, but
the nesting is wrong and misleading.

Fixes: 4dc84c06a343 ("net: ethtool: extend ringparam set/get APIs for tx_push")
Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
v2:
- Added Fixes: tag as suggested by Breno Leitao.
- Added Reviewed-by tags from Vadim Fedorenko and Breno Leitao.
---
 net/ethtool/rings.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ethtool/rings.c b/net/ethtool/rings.c
index 0fd5dcc3729f..9054c89c5d7b 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/rings.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/rings.c
@@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static int rings_reply_size(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_TX */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_RX_BUF_LEN */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))  +	/* _RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT */
-	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)  +	/* _RINGS_CQE_SIZE */
+	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_CQE_SIZE */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))  +	/* _RINGS_TX_PUSH */
-	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))) +	/* _RINGS_RX_PUSH */
+	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))  +	/* _RINGS_RX_PUSH */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN_MAX */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_HDS_THRESH */
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ethtool: fix missing closing paren in rings_reply_size()

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Fri,  8 May 2026 20:54:12 +0800 you wrote:
> sizeof(u32) on the _RINGS_CQE_SIZE line is missing its closing
> parenthesis, causing nla_total_size() to absorb the subsequent
> _TX_PUSH and _RX_PUSH entries. The resulting size estimate
> happens to be numerically identical due to NLA alignment, but
> the nesting is wrong and misleading.
> 
> Fixes: 4dc84c06a343 ("net: ethtool: extend ringparam set/get APIs for tx_push")
> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v2] net: ethtool: fix missing closing paren in rings_reply_size()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/73d587ae684d

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Re: [PATCH] net: ethtool: fix missing closing paren in rings_reply_size()

[Breno Leitao]

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> sizeof(u32) on the _RINGS_CQE_SIZE line is missing its closing
> parenthesis, causing nla_total_size() to absorb the subsequent
> _TX_PUSH and _RX_PUSH entries. The resulting size estimate
> happens to be numerically identical due to NLA alignment, but
> the nesting is wrong and misleading.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>

Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

Even thought the resulting size is identical, I am wondering if you
should add the Fixes: here. (or target net-next instead).

I think this is a net material, which will require a Fixes: tag.

[PATCH net v2] net: ethtool: fix missing closing paren in rings_reply_size()

[Tao Cui]

sizeof(u32) on the _RINGS_CQE_SIZE line is missing its closing
parenthesis, causing nla_total_size() to absorb the subsequent
_TX_PUSH and _RX_PUSH entries. The resulting size estimate
happens to be numerically identical due to NLA alignment, but
the nesting is wrong and misleading.

Fixes: 4dc84c06a343 ("net: ethtool: extend ringparam set/get APIs for tx_push")
Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
v2:
- Added Fixes: tag as suggested by Breno Leitao.
- Added Reviewed-by tags from Vadim Fedorenko and Breno Leitao.
---
 net/ethtool/rings.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ethtool/rings.c b/net/ethtool/rings.c
index 0fd5dcc3729f..9054c89c5d7b 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/rings.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/rings.c
@@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static int rings_reply_size(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_TX */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_RX_BUF_LEN */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))  +	/* _RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT */
-	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)  +	/* _RINGS_CQE_SIZE */
+	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_CQE_SIZE */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))  +	/* _RINGS_TX_PUSH */
-	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))) +	/* _RINGS_RX_PUSH */
+	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u8))  +	/* _RINGS_RX_PUSH */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN_MAX */
 	       nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) +	/* _RINGS_HDS_THRESH */
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ethtool: fix missing closing paren in rings_reply_size()

[Andrew Lunn]

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:04:35PM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> sizeof(u32) on the _RINGS_CQE_SIZE line is missing its closing
> parenthesis, causing nla_total_size() to absorb the subsequent
> _TX_PUSH and _RX_PUSH entries. The resulting size estimate
> happens to be numerically identical due to NLA alignment, but
> the nesting is wrong and misleading.
> 
> Fixes: 4dc84c06a343 ("net: ethtool: extend ringparam set/get APIs for tx_push")
> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - Added Fixes: tag as suggested by Breno Leitao.
> - Added Reviewed-by tags from Vadim Fedorenko and Breno Leitao.

Please always start a new thread for a new version of a
patch. Otherwise the CI/CD system just thinks it is a comment to an
existing patch.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

	Andrew