From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net_rx_action/NAPI oops [PATCH]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:55:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071127145537.6bf1af68@freepuppy.rosehill> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474C9B84.5090103@intel.com>
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:34:44 -0800
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:52:24 +0100
> > Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I've discovered a bug while testing the new multiQ NAPI code. In hi-load
> >> situations when we take down an interface we get a kernel panic. The
> >> oops is below.
> >>
> >> From what I see this happens when driver does napi_disable() and clears
> >> NAPI_STATE_SCHED. In net_rx_action there is a check for work == weight
> >> a sort indirect test but that's now not enough to cover the load situation.
> >> where we have NAPI_STATE_SCHED cleared by e1000_down in my case and still
> >> full quota. Latest git but I'll guess the is the same in all later kernels.
> >> There might be different solutions... one variant is below:
> >
> > It is considered a driver bug in 2.6.24 to call netif_rx_complete (clear NAPI_STATE_SCHED)
> > and do a full quota. That bug already had to be fixed in other drivers,
> > look like e1000 has same problem.
>
> Stephen,
>
> please enlighten me, can you e.g. show me a commit of other drivers where you
> fixed this up?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Auke
Author: David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> 2007-10-11 18:08:29
Committer: David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> 2007-10-11 18:08:29
Parent: b9f2c0440d806e01968c3ed4def930a43be248ad ([netdrvr] Stop using legacy hooks ->self_test_count, ->get_stats_count)
Child: 266918303226cceac7eca38ced30f15f277bd89c ([SKY2]: status polling loop (post merge))
Branches: master, origin
Follows: v2.6.23
Precedes: v2.6.24-rc1
[NET]: Fix NAPI completion handling in some drivers.
In order for the list handling in net_rx_action() to be
correct, drivers must follow certain rules as stated by
this comment in net_rx_action():
/* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they
* consume the entire weight. In such cases this code
* still "owns" the NAPI instance and therefore can
* move the instance around on the list at-will.
*/
A few drivers do not do this because they mix the budget checks
with reading hardware state, resulting in crashes like the one
reported by takano@axe-inc.co.jp.
BNX2 and TG3 are taken care of here, SKY2 fix is from Stephen
Hemminger.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-27 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-27 18:52 net_rx_action/NAPI oops [PATCH] Robert Olsson
2007-11-27 22:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-27 22:34 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-27 22:55 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-11-28 0:24 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-28 12:36 ` Robert Olsson
2007-11-28 16:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-28 17:22 ` Robert Olsson
2007-11-30 16:56 ` Robert Olsson
2007-11-30 17:13 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-28 12:27 ` Robert Olsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071127145537.6bf1af68@freepuppy.rosehill \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox