From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: liuhangbin@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, sbrivio@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti negative overflow
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 18:14:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190406.181428.1813237479044536410.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190404124518.16794-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 20:45:18 +0800
> Similarly to dad9b335c694 ("netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti
> overflow"), we should not decrease promiscuity if it is already 0.
>
> An example is after adding a team interface to bridge, the team interface
> will enter promisc mode. Then if we add a slave to team0, the slave will
> keep promisc off. If we remove team from bridge, both team0 and slave will
> decrease the promiscuity, which will cause a negative overflow on the slave.
> The team's issue will be fixed in a separate patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
These little hacks are endless.
I would rather see team and bridge and bonding appropriately keep the
promisc count adjusted as need when slaves are added/removed etc.
What is the point of the counter if it doesn't "count" properly?
I'm not applying this.
Because if I apply it, this just encourages more hackish workarounds
for the fundamental problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-07 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 12:45 [PATCH net] netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti negative overflow Hangbin Liu
2019-04-07 1:14 ` David Miller [this message]
2019-04-08 12:50 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-04-07 15:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 12:52 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190406.181428.1813237479044536410.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox