From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Vivien Didelot" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Mauri Sandberg" <sandberg@mailfence.com>,
"DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com>,
"Alvin Šipraga" <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4 v4] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support fast aging
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:45:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929214504.gvrcx7lpl5apouwc@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929210349.130099-4-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:03:48PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This implements fast aging per-port using the special "security"
> register, which will flush any learned L2 LUT entries on a port.
>
> Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
> Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v3->v4:
> - No changes, rebased on the other patches.
> ChangeLog v2->v3:
> - Underscore that this only affects learned L2 entries, not
> static ones.
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - New patch suggested by Vladimir.
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> index 52e750ea790e..748f22ab9130 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> @@ -1359,6 +1359,19 @@ rtl8366rb_port_bridge_flags(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void
> +rtl8366rb_port_fast_age(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> +{
> + struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
> +
> + /* This will age out any learned L2 entries */
> + regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_SECURITY_CTRL,
> + BIT(port), BIT(port));
Is there any delay that needs to be added between these two operations?
> + /* Restore the normal state of things */
> + regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8366RB_SECURITY_CTRL,
> + BIT(port), 0);
> +}
> +
> static int rtl8366rb_change_mtu(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int new_mtu)
> {
> struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
> @@ -1771,6 +1784,7 @@ static const struct dsa_switch_ops rtl8366rb_switch_ops = {
> .port_disable = rtl8366rb_port_disable,
> .port_pre_bridge_flags = rtl8366rb_port_pre_bridge_flags,
> .port_bridge_flags = rtl8366rb_port_bridge_flags,
> + .port_fast_age = rtl8366rb_port_fast_age,
> .port_change_mtu = rtl8366rb_change_mtu,
> .port_max_mtu = rtl8366rb_max_mtu,
> };
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 21:03 [PATCH net-next 0/4 v4] RTL8366RB enhancements Linus Walleij
2021-09-29 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4 v4] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support disabling learning Linus Walleij
2021-09-29 21:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-09-30 10:45 ` Alvin Šipraga
2021-10-04 20:57 ` Linus Walleij
2021-10-05 7:59 ` Alvin Šipraga
2021-10-05 14:07 ` Linus Walleij
2021-10-05 14:45 ` Alvin Šipraga
2021-09-29 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4 v4] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support flood control Linus Walleij
2021-09-29 21:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-09-30 9:09 ` Alvin Šipraga
2021-10-04 22:22 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-29 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4 v4] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support fast aging Linus Walleij
2021-09-29 21:45 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-10-04 22:41 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-29 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4 v4] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support setting STP state Linus Walleij
2021-09-29 21:54 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-10-04 21:07 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210929214504.gvrcx7lpl5apouwc@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=alsi@bang-olufsen.dk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandberg@mailfence.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox